Supreme court nominees

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kmcicco2000
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
unusualsuspects said:
Well if Merrick Garland could wait
Click to expand...
If Clinton had won, he wouldn’t have waited long, unless she was going to appoint an even more rabid abortionist.

In any event, I don’t care about Garland. Obama appointed two S.C. justices. Why should he get three abortionists if the Repubs could prevent it?
 
John24 said:
Why should Trump get a sexual predator when the Republicans could prevent it?
Click to expand...
Why should anyone smear a candidate having a flawless record with “sexual predator” because of some left winger, “p—y hat wearer” who has an axe to grind with anybody named Kavenaugh?
 
I agree I just flagged his post.Completely out of line
To the point of the p—y hat crowd.I find it most disingenuous and not just a bit hypocritical that thir movement is all about being respected etc.Yet they wear hats that are beyond crass.
Who can take them seriously?
 
Last edited:
I imagine people will start taking your outrage seriously when you stop calling people “abortionists”.
 
Jeanne_S said:
Don’t you think it would b a good thing for such an honorable man with an impeccable record ,such as Judge Kavanaugh to grace the SCOTUS?
Click to expand...
I would prefer that issues of false testimony and drunken sexual assault were not hanging over his head.
I find his changed views on the immunity of the Executive troubling. I think he has a good perspective on some social issues and bad one on others. i think the nation would survive his tenure on the court, and woudl also survive if someone elase is appointed instead of him.
 
Dr_Meinheimer said:
But I can’t do both at once.
Click to expand...
One can reserve judgment.
Dr_Meinheimer said:
No offense, but that’s just a dumb thing to say.
Click to expand...
I think that you realize that your remark is offensive and the the “no offense” doesn’t change that.
Her friends quoted in the article see her in a good light, and understand that her decision to come forward was a very difficult one. With the death threats now directed at her, it may be that it is more difficulty that she had imagined.
 
Last edited:
Of course the Nation will survive his tenure.We will be all the better for it.
 
John24 said:
I imagine people will start taking your outrage seriously when you stop calling people “abortionists”.
Click to expand...
Hardly likely. Those who support abortion aren’t going to change just because I call it what it is. Maybe some need to hear it, after all.
 
Last edited:
there would be no opposition to Kavanaugh, and this allegation against him would never have come forward, if He had stated he supports abortion rights. This entire fiasco is about the Democratic party protecting the right to kill unborn babies.
 
Ridgerunner said:
Why should anyone smear a candidate having a flawless record with “sexual predator” because of some left winger, “p—y hat wearer” who has an axe to grind with anybody named Kavenaugh?
Click to expand...
Do you really think that allegations of sexual assault should be dismissed because the accusation comes from someone that you call a " left-winger, “p—y hat wearer” who has an axe to grind with anybody named Kavenaugh? Really?
 
If you say so. I’d say a lot of people agree with me. People say dumb things all the time. Not the end of the world, just silly on her part.
 
I didn’t say that, of course. Part of it was “…a candidate with a flawless record” followed by what you snipped out of what I said. And I said one shouldn’t smear such a person with a term like “sexual predator”.

You, I take it, think it’s fine to call Kavanaugh a “sexual predator” without knowing anything of the kind.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top