Supreme court nominees

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kmcicco2000
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sen Grassley, the chairman of the Judiciary committee sent this letter to Sen Feinstein yesterday. Here are some of the highlights:

I am writing to request that you provide me a copy of the letter dated July 30, 2018, that you received from Dr. Christine Blasey Ford containing allegations of sexual assault against Judge Brett Kavanaugh. My staff has made repeated requests for this document-which has become a significant piece of evidence in Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation process-but your staff has so far refused to provide a copy of the letter.

_You received this letter approximately seven weeks ago. But the contents of the letter were leaked only last week when it appeared the Senate was about to confirm Judge Kavanaugh.

As you know, the Majority staff spoke with Judge Kavanaugh as part of the background investigation. Judge Kavanaugh immediately agreed to cooperate with Senate investigators. He sat for a transcribed interview on Monday. He understood that he was under penalty of felony, if he was not truthful. He fully, candidly, and unequivocally answered all questions. We have no reason to doubt the truthfulness of Judge Kavanaugh’s testimony. Judge Kavanaugh volunteered to come back to a public hearing.

As is standard practice, we invited the Minority staff to participate and ask Judge Kavanaugh its own questions, but the Minority staff declined. The Majority staff has also sought to set up interviews with Dr. Ford, Mark Judge, and two other alleged witnesses. The Minority staff is welcome to participate in the investigative process as well, but it has thus far declined.


The word contemptible doesn’t capture what is going on here.
 
This applies only if the accusations are proven to be false. If the accusations are merely not believed, that does not land someone in prison.
You mean like this???


A Long Island woman convicted of making false rape allegations against two college football players rolled her eyes in a Connecticut courtroom on Thursday as she was sentenced to one year in jail.

Former Sacred Heart University student Nikki Yovino initially said she was raped by the two men in 2016, but later admitted she did not tell the truth.

Facing punishment, the two students left school.

“I went from being a college student to sitting at home being expelled with no way to clear my name,” Malik St. Hilaire said in a Bridgeport courtroom on Thursday as he stood near Yovino, according to The Hour newspaper. “I just hope she knows what she has done to me, my life will never be the same. I did nothing wrong, but everything has been altered because of this.”
 
Last edited:
40.png
LeafByNiggle:
This applies only if the accusations are proven to be false. If the accusations are merely not believed, that does not land someone in prison.
You mean like this???
Well, yes, of course. In the case you cited the accuser admitted she lied. If Prof. Ford admits she lied I expect the same thing will happen to her.
 
Last edited:
I’m asking you a simple question but you answered it without answering it l
 
Her story is not credible, this is just to prevent the confirmation of Kavanaugh.
We’re talking about “investigation”, not “prevention”. If Ford’s accusation is so off-the-wall, then the FBI should be able to conclude as such very quickly.

BTW, she said she first told someone in 2012, not 2017, when she was in couple’s therapy. .
 
This is also a federal setting since we’re talking about a SCOTUS appointment, and all that has to be done is for Trump to give the nod to the FBI to conduct the investigation. The FBI is often called to investigate matters of appointment as standard procedure for background checks.

If Kavanaugh is innocent, he has nothing to worry about.

BTW, I personally hope he is innocent but I’m not willing to suggest that they take a chance that he’s not. There simply is no need for a rush to judgment.
 
A lot of things can happen, but I would suggest that we not assume any of them-- better to have the investigation, imo.
 
He has been investigated by the FBI six times, including this time. That should not be shrugged aside just because Sen Feinstein hid the ball for two months.
 
New allegations need to be checked out, not ignored nor assumed to be wrong. Also 7 is a magic number.😏
 
And after that, then what? Another charge, then another, then another? This is not real. It’s a phony ruse to keep a possibly prolife Catholic off the bench. That’s why Feinstein hid the ball for two months; to spring it just at the best moment to derail the appointment by calling for yet another “investigation”.
 
But why do they do this knowing that Trump would probably appoint someone even more conservative? One thing I haven’t heard in this whole debacle is Cavanaugh’s Jesuit leanings, who are historically enemies of traditionalists.
 
Yesterday’s Jesuits are not today’s Jesuits. The Dems are going to smear any appointee that might be prolife. And a Catholic is immediately suspect for that among the bigots on the left.
 
Last edited:
Sotomayor, but NARAL fully endorsed her, meaning she’s pro-abortion.
 
He has been investigated by the FBI six times, including this time. That should not be shrugged aside just because Sen Feinstein hid the ball for two months.
It has already been explained why Sen. Feinstein “hid the ball,” even though the explanation caused you gastric distress. And here is one really quick thing they could investigate in a matter of hours. They could interview the therapist Ford claims to have told this to in 2012. That would certainly be telling, one way or they other, wouldn’t it?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top