Supreme court nominees

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kmcicco2000
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The therapist? Nothing she has said has panned out, I haven’t heard this one yet. She is a political activist, perhaps her therapist is too. That doesn’t add up to much.

So, yes, color me cynical, even 2012, that’s still a few decades later.
 
Last edited:
Victoria33 said:
The therapist? Nothing she has said has panned out, I haven’t heard this one yet. She is a political activist, perhaps her therapist is too. That doesn’t add up to much.
Click to expand...
Ha! Just call everyone who confirms Ford’s story an activist! Don’t you think that a professional therapist would be reluctant to jeopardize her reputation and career by inventing a therapy session that never took place? I think this is definitely tinfoil hat time.
 
LeafByNiggle said:
Ha! Just call everyone who confirms Ford’s story an activist! Don’t you think that a professional therapist would be reluctant to jeopardize her reputation and career by inventing a therapy session that never took place? I think this is definitely tinfoil hat time.
Click to expand...
I’m not aware of anyone who confirms her story, sorry.
 
Victoria33 said:
40.png
LeafByNiggle:
Ha! Just call everyone who confirms Ford’s story an activist! Don’t you think that a professional therapist would be reluctant to jeopardize her reputation and career by inventing a therapy session that never took place? I think this is definitely tinfoil hat time.
Click to expand...
I’m not aware of anyone who confirms her story, sorry.
Click to expand...
Well, have the FBI question the therapist! If you plug up your ears then you definitely will not be aware of anyone who confirms her story. But look at the bright side. Maybe the therapist will deny Ford’s claim. Then Ford will be sunk!
 
LeafByNiggle said:
Well, have the FBI question the therapist! If you plug up your ears then you definitely will not be aware of anyone who confirms her story. But look at the bright side. Maybe the therapist will deny Ford’s claim. Then Ford will be sunk!
Click to expand...
The FBI have not looked into this and aren’t planning to at this point.

This may well be too, just chasing another windmill.

Kavanaugh’s wife has now received some very cruel threats too as of now.

I keep up with the story.

I won’t respond on this for awhile. Your demeanor seems to be slipping some “gastric distress”, “tin foil hats”?, “plugging up my ears”?
 
Last edited:
I didn’t realize her therapist was there. Of that’s your strategy, just have them interview me, since I heard her story too.
 
This isn’t the first time Ford has actually made the accusation. She reportedly made it during a therapy session in 2012. But here’s where things get interesting. Ford never named Kavanaugh in the therapist notes she provided to the Post. She only told the therapist, according to the notes, that she was assaulted by students “from an elitist boys’ school.” These attackers went on to become “highly respected and high-ranking members of society in Washington.”

Here comes the discrepancy: According to the therapist’s notes, four boys were involved, not two. Ford’s husband told the Post that she detailed it correctly – that two boys attacked her – but the therapist flubbed.
Click to expand...
https://thepoliticalinsider.com/kavanaugh-accuser-discrepancy/

Sorry, I had heard bits of the therapist story but not all. So, we will see. I think now, they are saying, maybe they will try to get her to testify next Thursday. Perhaps no press or cameras, something like that.
 
Jerry Brown has consistently mandated the promotion of the homosexual lifestyle in California’s public schools. He is strongly pro-abortion and pro-euthanasia.
He may have believed in Church teachings at one time. But in his last two terms he has consistently upheld the aforementioned.
Unfortunately, his inevitable replacement may be just as bad, or worse.
 
And did not graduate.
Seminary attendance does not make anyone a lifelong faithful Roman Catholic.
Such distinctions may be lost on non-Catholics.
Brown, Feinstein, Pelosi, Harris, etc. Birds of a feather. Pro-abortion, pro-homosexualist / transgender agenda, etc.
 
Last edited:
I’d check out the timeline but Kavanaugh “may” have already been on a list of judges to be selected by Romney back in 2012.

Also, someone told me the “mortage story” is false or at least, it did not proceed in the way we are told, that Kavanaugh’s mother, a judge, foreclosed on the house of the parents of Christine Blasey Ford. So, that’s just a headsup. I don’t know which is true but we may all find out more about this in due time. The next 10 days.
 
It’s unfortunate, the times back then were changing. It might not be like now.

Originally, Ted Kennedy, Jesse Jackson both were against abortion, one might want to double check this but I believe that is so.

It appears to have been a bit of a political move.

So who knows? Maybe Gov. Brown might have seen it one way, once upon a time. That was a long time ago that he was in the seminary.
 
LeafByNiggle said:
Have then been able to time-travel too? I guess they all drive DeLoreans.
Click to expand...
I can’t make sense of your comment. She was in therapy in 2012.
According to The Washington Post, Ford said she told no one of the incident involving Kavanaugh in any detail until 2012, when she was in couples therapy with her husband.Therapists have been know to extract totally false memories from their patients.
I don’t see why driving a Delorean would be relevant to the question at hand.
 
Last edited:
No one doubts that part. It is her revelation that it was Kavanaugh all of a sudden, along with the fact that’s the only detail that she is apparently sure of that makes people doubt her.
 
Victoria33 said:
Maybe Gov. Brown might have seen it one way, once upon a time. That was a long time ago that he was in the seminary.
Click to expand...
Probably at the same time Ronald Reagan signed the liberal abortion bill in CA which I believe still stands today.
 
ProVobis said:
Probably at the same time Ronald Reagan signed the liberal abortion bill in CA which I believe still stands today.
Click to expand...
ProVobis said:
Probably at the same time Ronald Reagan signed the liberal abortion bill in CA which I believe still stands today.
Click to expand...
www.nationalreview.com

Reagan’s Darkest Hour | National Review

As president, Ronald Reagan was an unflagging champion of unborn human life. “Today there is a wound in our national conscience,” Reagan told a joint session of Congress in his 1986 State of the Un…
www.nationalreview.com www.nationalreview.com

I’m not sure if your description is apt. He was probably trying to do the right thing in the face of what was to come. I’m not excusing it by any means but I think the situation was different. He was trying to stop a worse bill from coming along.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top