Q
qui_est_ce
Guest
Yes, they run on ideology not reason.Sotomeyor, Kagan, Ginsberg and Breyer either don’t care or actually welcome that sort of totalitarian control over the country.
Yes, they run on ideology not reason.Sotomeyor, Kagan, Ginsberg and Breyer either don’t care or actually welcome that sort of totalitarian control over the country.
Yes.Did you know that Hillary Rodham was a Goldwater conservative in her early years and was president of the Young Republicans at Wellesley College?
Perhaps so. I’ve not seen, however, much ideology from those Justices in cases that don’t touch on “hot button” issues.Yes, they run on ideology not reason.
Andeat your broccoli and work out at the gubmint gym.I would love it if this monstrosity is upheld, Obama looses in November, the Dems loose the Senate, and then pass a law that mandates that every household purchases a firearm and a set amount of ammunition. The liberals will literally explode. They’ll screech YOU CAN’T MAKE US BUY SOMETHING WE DON’T WANT TO BUY!!! at which point the Republicans can just calmly point out that the Democrats passed a law that does say the government can MAKE you engage in commerce.
Isn’t there a saying? You can lead them to the gym, but you can’t make them exercise?Andeat your broccoli and work out at the gubmint gym.![]()
Have you seen this:Perhaps so. I’ve not seen, however, much ideology from those Justices in cases that don’t touch on “hot button” issues.
Playing Favorites
Contorting Text
Playing Legislator
Living Constitutionalism
Abusing Precedent
Judicial Imperialism
Importing Foreign Law
Nullifying Rights
Judicial Dishonesty
Right-wing site with its own ax to grind. Not worth my time. Thanks anyway.Have you seen this:
What is Judicial Activism?
Judicial activism occurs when judges write subjective policy preferences into the law rather than apply the law impartially according to its original meaning.
There are nine types of Judicial Activism:
orderinthecourt.org/Code:Playing Favorites Contorting Text Playing Legislator Living Constitutionalism Abusing Precedent Judicial Imperialism Importing Foreign Law Nullifying Rights Judicial Dishonesty
And if the right wing justices get their way in decisions, that’s not judicial activism as well? Depends on whose ox is gored, it seems to me.Perhaps - however Judicial Activism is indeed how the left inflicts their agenda on the majority.
Got an example of a Left-wing site with no ax of its own to grind?Right-wing site with its own ax to grind. Not worth my time. Thanks anyway.![]()
codepink4peace.org/Got an example of a Left-wing site with no ax of its own to grind?
No. Conservative judicial activism is liberals not getting their way.And if the right wing justices get their way in decisions, that’s not judicial activism as well? …
No, I don’t. I don’t visit such. You’ll never find a post of mine linking to some bunch of lefties or rightwingers, either. They all lie.Got an example of a Left-wing site with no ax of its own to grind?
According to my TV hero, Greg House, MD, “Nobody changes and everyone lies”.No, I don’t. I don’t visit such. You’ll never find a post of mine linking to some bunch of lefties or rightwingers, either. They all lie.
Depends. There was a line in a movie where a suspect in some case praised his attorney, “Next to him, the ACLU are Nazis.”Hmmmm… I do not think the ACLU would ever be labeled ‘Right - Wing’ - yes?
Wm. F. Buckley, Jr.'s show, Firing Line and his two-hour debates were labeled “conservative” although liberals got 50% of the time to make their case about the issue of the day. The website you criticized with your ad hominem has a debate between a liberal and a conservative heritage.org/events/2010/07/judicial-activism, yet you label it “right-wing”. Like the Buckley shows, how can it be “right-wing” if both sides get to state their points?No, I don’t. I don’t visit such. You’ll never find a post of mine linking to some bunch of lefties or rightwingers, either. They all lie.
Wm. F. Buckley, Jr.'s show, Firing Line and his two-hour debates were labeled “conservative” although liberals got 50% of the time to make their case about the issue of the day. The website you criticized with your ad hominem has a debate between a liberal and a conservative heritage.org/events/2010/07/judicial-activism, yet you label it “right-wing”. Like the Buckley shows, how can it be “right-wing” if both sides get to state their points?
You just did.Did I criticize Buckley’s show with an ad hominem attack on him? Show me where. To the best of my recollection, I’ve never mentioned William Buckley in any of the thousands of posts I’ve put on the Forum.
![]()
![]()
They want to tax the rich and create jobs.