Susan Rice requested to unmask names of Trump transition officials, sources say

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cathoholic
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I think someone besides Susan Rice needs to brought before the committee under oath to answer these types of questions. We already know Susan will perjure herself evidenced in her interviews. I hope the house committee on this gets rolling soon!
 
Michael68 said:
Giving the President a spreadsheet of these unmasked names is normal procedure? Is there usually an urgency to get more of this info before an election?
If these Americans are not accused of anything, why does the administration need to know who they? Why is this not considered surveillance now?
Click to expand...
Still confused on the timeline. Sad.
Stll in denial about the investigation into collusion of Trump’s friends with Russian during the election. Very sad.
 
dvdjs said:
Obstinate in that narrative, even when the true evidence is against you. Sad.
Click to expand...
Benghazi, last week, last month. To deny this is amazing and makes me think you don’t care for the truth and will promote this lie for your boy.
 
Michael68 said:
Benghazi, last week, last month. To deny this is amazing and makes me think you don’t care for the truth and will promote this lie for your boy.
Click to expand...
The truth is precisely what I care about. By not confronting the actual Q&A in the Mitchell interview, you have disqualified yourself from being in a position to assess the truth of her statements, relevant to this thread.

PS - what “boy” are you talking about?
 
dvdjs said:
The truth is precisely what I care about. By not confronting the actual Q&A in the Mitchell interview, you have disqualified yourself from being in a position to assess the truth of her statements, relevant to this thread.

PS - what “boy” are you talking about?
Click to expand...
I saw the interview. Why do you insist on saying I didn’t? I know she lied. I’m at work right now so I can’t give you time, frame number and the temperature outside when she lied exactly, but anybody, except you, can see she was lying. She also lied in the PBS interview
 
Michael68 said:
I saw the interview. Why do you insist on saying I didn’t? I know she lied. I’m at work right now so I can’t give you time, frame number and the temperature outside when she lied exactly, but anybody, except you, can see she was lying. She also lied in the PBS interview
Click to expand...
Susan Rice lied about Benghazi,I see a character issue and a pattern here…
 
She lied when she said this is normal, to unmask Americans, to do her job. If this is so normal why are we now hearing about it and people are genuinely shocked!
She lied when she said we are confusing unmasked and leaked. Nobody is confusing the two. She requested the identity of Americans and provided a spreadsheet of this information to the Obama White House. She lied and said the president had no knowledge of this,yet admitted to preparing a report for him. ( notice she didn’t say spreadsheet but report.) The leak had to come from her or the Obama White House. We know we can’t believe a word she says, so she might be the leaker acting under orders to leak bits of her “report” at times it seemed Trump was gaining in the election.

As far as the PBS interview, she lied and said she didn’t know about any of this, and she found out through the media reports. Who do we know that routinely used this fake excuse?

Done for now
 
Why did Susan Rice feel the need to unmask these Americans when the IC didn’t feel the need to do so? Political reasons are the only reason she would have these Americans unmasked.
 
Why did Suan Rice not unmask Hillary operatives who spoke with these Russians? Its not political right?
 
Michael68 said:
I saw the interview. Why do you insist on saying I didn’t? I know she lied. I’m at work right now so I can’t give you time, frame number and the temperature outside when she lied exactly, but anybody, except you, can see she was lying. She also lied in the PBS interview
Click to expand...
i have not said anywhere that you did not see “the interview”.

The PBS interview was not live; it was edited and did not include the full question and answer. PBS has posted the full question and answer. What was asked and what was answers are different from what has been wildly trumped up and propagated on the alt-media sites, and parroted here.
 
Listening to a sound bite of Susan Rice,when asked about this issue her response was staged. " I asked for no in formation on nobody" .
Really? Does anybody believe Susan Rice,a Harvard grad,really has grammar this poor?
I have never heard her speak this way in the past.Add to that her Hillaresque laugh at the end,is very revealing.She is lying.
 
Michael68 said:
Why did Susan Rice feel the need to unmask these Americans when the IC didn’t feel the need to do so? Political reasons are the only reason she would have these Americans unmasked.
Click to expand...
Rice was part of the IC. Moreover, if any were unmasked, then it would have been done the concurrence of people in the IC involved in that process. Read the links that I provided. There is a process to this.
 
dvdjs said:
Rice was part of the IC. Moreover, if any were unmasked, then it would have been done the concurrence of people in the IC involved in that process. Read the links that I provided. There is a process to this.
Click to expand...
Yes, she said process a lot too. Why did she want these names unmasked if the intel was only of use politically? A source admitted that the only intel gained was political not security
 
Michael68 said:
Why did Suan Rice not unmask Hillary operatives who spoke with these Russians? Its not political right?
Click to expand...
In case you have forgotten, at the time of unmasking the IC was, and continues to be involved in an investigation of Russian cyber attacks during the election. It is also investigation possible collusion of members of the Trump team with the Russians. There is, according to the IC a national security reason for unmasking Trump associates. There are no such investigations that have been disclosed regarding “Hillary operatives”. Nor, btw, has it been disclosed, btw, that there has not been any unmasking of “Hillary operatives”.

Do you have a source that indicates that no “Hillary operatives” have been unmasked?
 
dvdjs said:
In case you have forgotten, at the time of unmasking the IC was, and continues to be involved in an investigation of Russian cyber attacks during the election. It is also investigation possible collusion of members of the Trump team with the Russians. There is, according to the IC a national security reason for unmasking Trump associates. There are no such investigations that have been disclosed regarding “Hillary operatives”. Nor, btw, has it been disclosed, btw, that there has not been any unmasking of “Hillary operatives”.

Do you have a source that indicates that no “Hillary operatives” have been unmasked?
Click to expand...
Ummm, the media silence
 
Michael68 said:
Yes, she said process a lot too. Why did she want these names unmasked if the intel was only of use politically? A source admitted that the only intel gained was political not security
Click to expand...
A source? Who? How about a link?
 
Michael68 said:
Ummm, the media silence
Click to expand...
Are you really making an argument from silence?
That is so funny.
But is the argument, that because of the silence there was no such unmasking, or that the silence is part of the media bias to protect Hillary and company?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top