Susan Sarandon Under Fire for Calling Pope Benedict a Nazi

  • Thread starter Thread starter qui_est_ce
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Q

qui_est_ce

Guest
Actress Susan Sarandon called German pontiff Pope Benedict XVI a Nazi during a discussion session at the Hamptons Film Festival over the weekend.
Sarandon, who won an Academy Award for her role in the 1995 anti-death penalty film "Dead Man Walking,” said she had sent a copy of the book on which the movie is based to the Pope.
“The last one. Not this Nazi one we have now,” she reportedly told Newsday, and later repeated at the Ciroc vodka-sponsored panel.
The story goes on to say nobody “seemed bothered” by the remark.
 
Disgusting.

But if nobody seemed bothered how is she under fire? is the media against her on this one?
 
Disgusting.

But if nobody seemed bothered how is she under fire? is the media against her on this one?
According to the article, her audience didn’t seem bothered, but the Catholic League and the Jewish Anti-Defamation League are calling on her to apologize.
 
What i always find funny about the hate for the current pope is that the same people seem to think the last pope was way better.

But the last pope made the current one head of the congregationd for the doctrine of faith (or by a lo earlier name head inquisitor). He would not have done so, if they had been vast theological differences between them. So anyone expressing hartred for Benedikt XVI but likes John Paul II demonstrates lack of knowledge about church.
 
No one in the film audience at the festival seemed upset, the article says…but it goes on to quote plenty who were upset by her comment who were not in the audience…
Christianity is under attack in this country. The people who are upset are Catholics and Jews. Calling Pope Benedict XVI a Nazi trivializes the horror that real Nazi’s inflicted on both Jews and Catholics in the 1940’s. My uncle, a Catholic priest in France, “disapppeared” during the war. After the liberation, he was found wandering in the streets of his home town, a bag of skin and bones.
 
She may have just been using that to identify which pope she was talking about because she could not come up with his proper name…or rather, his new pope name…and was not meaning to offend.
Sorry, but I cannot buy that. No way, no how. Also, she has made it clear in the past that she has no love for B16.
 
Okay, but he was indeed part of the Nazi/Hitler youth group. It is a fact.
She may have just been using that to identify which pope she was talking about because she could not come up with his proper name…or rather, his new pope name…and was not meaning to offend.
If no one in the room who heard the remark seemed upset, her tone may have been shown she had no ill will. Perhaps taken out of context and not being there, the remark seems much harsher than it is or than she meant it.
So you are ok with the fact that she called our Pope a “nazi”? I’m sorry, but there is no way to make that right in my mind no matter how you try to justify it. The fact that she couldn’t even remember JPII’s name, the actual Pope she sent the book to since it was so important for her to do so, says more than enough about her intent and her opinions.
 
Okay, but he was indeed part of the Nazi/Hitler youth group. It is a fact.
She may have just been using that to identify which pope she was talking about because she could not come up with his proper name…or rather, his new pope name…and was not meaning to offend.
If no one in the room who heard the remark seemed upset, her tone may have been shown she had no ill will. Perhaps taken out of context and not being there, the remark seems much harsher than it is or than she meant it.
Because whenever you cannot remember some one’s name, pick the most derogatory title and use that.

She could not think of the words “Current Pope, Former Pope”? She didn’t know Nazi is an offensive term? Sheesh. :rolleyes:
 
Okay, but he was indeed part of the Nazi/Hitler youth group. It is a fact.
She may have just been using that to identify which pope she was talking about because she could not come up with his proper name…or rather, his new pope name…and was not meaning to offend.
If no one in the room who heard the remark seemed upset, her tone may have been shown she had no ill will. Perhaps taken out of context and not being there, the remark seems much harsher than it is or than she meant it.
If you can’t remember someone’s name, you don’t use the most derogatory thing you can think of… unless you mean it as an attack.

I’m not buying your argument here, and I don’t think anyone else is going to either.
 
Why jump at the bait? It isn’t about the Pope, it is about Sarandon. She’s a 60 something actor who longs for center stage. She showed up at the Wall St. protest and no one knew her, went on a Leno or another where she displayed her new tat going down her back, was the first cougar now “separated”. Who cares what these people think? She’s right up there with Michael Moore.
 
Right…but she may have not meant to attack Christianity or trivialize the holocaust just by using that word. So many people on this forum balk at all the “politically correct” tip-toe talk…but here, she may have just let that word slip because she is aware of his ties to the Hitler Youth and was reaching to identify him…that’s what it sounds like.
How would you feel if somebody called you a Nazi? Words like that don’t “slip.”
If he was a member of the Hitler youth, does that mean he was a member of the “Nazi party”? Or would he have been too young to be considered that?
No
 
Right…but she may have not meant to attack Christianity or trivialize the holocaust just by using that word. So many people on this forum balk at all the “politically correct” tip-toe talk…but here, she may have just let that word slip because she is aware of his ties to the Hitler Youth and was reaching to identify him…that’s what it sounds like.
If he was a member of the Hitler youth, does that mean he was a member of the “Nazi party”? Or would he have been too young to be considered that?
So glad your uncle survived. I have a friend, too, who survived the camps.
I don’t know your name ma’am, but if I understand correctly you have a kitchen to get to and some sandwiches to make. You know, since that’s a woman’s role and all of that.

What, you mean I can’t identify you in this fashion because I don’t know your name? That’s all what Susan did, after all.

Oh, I see how this works now.
*
(Note; obviously the first paragraph was said to prove a point. I can make my own sandwiches).*
 
Okay, but he was indeed part of the Nazi/Hitler youth group. It is a fact.
She may have just been using that to identify which pope she was talking about because she could not come up with his proper name…or rather, his new pope name…and was not meaning to offend.
If no one in the room who heard the remark seemed upset, her tone may have been shown she had no ill will. Perhaps taken out of context and not being there, the remark seems much harsher than it is or than she meant it.
She’s an idiot, just like all the other liberals she hangs out with.

Why give her all this attention, anyway?
 
Why jump at the bait? It isn’t about the Pope, it is about Sarandon. She’s a 60 something actor who longs for center stage. She showed up at the Wall St. protest and no one knew her, went on a Leno or another where she displayed her new tat going down her back, was the first cougar now “separated”. Who cares what these people think? She’s right up there with Michael Moore.
Exactly. If it wasn’t Susan Sarandon and was any other 60yo woman at a coctail party (with maybe a bit too much to drink) no one would of cared one ion.
 
Ms. Sarandon has shown what she thinks of our Pope and I’ll make sure to show what I think by not going to any of her movies.
Catholics, other Christians, and Jews need to start making our opinions known by NOT patronizing the products of people like this. We might not be famous individually with public platforms to announce what we believe, but we can make a difference as a group. The same goes for our voting power.
 
Exactly. If it wasn’t Susan Sarandon and was any other 60yo woman at a coctail party (with maybe a bit too much to drink) no one would of cared one ion.
I’m pretty sure I would be upset if it was ANYONE that had a microphone in front of their face at a media event and said the same thing as Sarandon did. It wasn’t a private cocktail party.
 
Yes, Pope Benedict was part of the “Hitler Youth” – as was every other German boy. Unlike many others, however, he deserted at the first available opportunity.

When stuff like this happens, it always makes me think of Mel Gibson. :o I mean, Sarandon says this disparaging remark while in full possession of her faculties. The interviewer was even a bit taken aback and tried to give her an opportunity to back pedal, but she only reasserted the slanderous claim. And yet, in two weeks, no one will remember or care. Contrast that with Mel Gibson who is still the object of ridicule for the things he said years ago while intoxicated.

I’m not trying to justify Gibson’s behavior. Not at all. There’s no excuse for such behavior. I just find it odd that those in Hollywood are so eager to forgive slanderous statements when they probably largely agree with them than they are to forgive those with whom they disagree. I mean, I can’t see anyone in Hollywood “shunning” Sarandon because of this.
 
She’s an idiot, just like all the other liberals she hangs out with.

Why give her all this attention, anyway?
We need to know what we are up against. Do you think she is the only celebrity who thinks this way?

BTW, I’ve only seen this on Fox, nobody else is running this story. She should be roundly condemned by the media for her bigotry. But that won’t happen.
 
Catholic League president Bill Donohue commented on this today:
Susan Sarandon’s ignorance is willful: those who have hatred in their veins are not interested in the truth. The fact is that Joseph Ratzinger (the pope) was conscripted at the age of 14 into the Hitler Youth, along with every other young German boy. Unlike most of the other teenagers, Ratzinger refused to go to meetings, bringing economic hardship to his family. Moreover, unlike most of the others, he deserted at the first opportunity.
When he was elected pope in 2005, Rabbi David Rosen, director of interreligious affairs for the American Jewish Committee, said it was “rubbish” to maintain that Ratzinger chose to belong to the Hitler Youth. He not only spoke kindly about the new pope, he added, “enrollment was compulsory.”
Sarandon’s comment is obscene. Sadly, it’s what we’ve come to expect from her.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top