Talking to a woman after mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter rkwittem
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Zyxx Road said:

“Xantippe, you’re not seeing things from my perspective.”

And you’re not listening. I say, right there in black and white “Obviously, don’t bother unless she’s a likely. If it’s the very first time you lay eyes on her or if you’re trying to keep it casual, coffee is perfectly fine.”

I’m essentially agreeing with you on the desirability of coffee as a casual first date option. You don’t have to buy dinner for every woman on Catholic Match. However, for a second date, coffee + pastry versus dinner is not financially that big of a difference. If you pay for coffee and pastry ($5–and that’s actually rather optimistic bearing in mind the existence of such things as pumpkin spice lattes and $3 muffins) plus an inexpensive activity (let’s say $5 or under), that is already $10. (In our town, that kind of inexpensive entertainment might include miniature golf, the $2 theater (50 cents one day a week!), or rollerskating on a cheap night.) Or, you could pay for lunch or a cheap dinner for exactly the same $10 and do a free activity. The financial side is pretty much identical with either option, but dinner looks more serious and is more grown up. If you want to convey seriousness, dinner (either out or cooked by yourself) needs to eventually make an appearance. Remember, you’re looking for somebody to eat dinner with every night.

“I’m going to ask you a simple question: do you see your husband as a meal ticket? Ok, I’m sure you don’t, but too many women do and I’m sure you know a few of those. If I spend money, all I have shown her is I can spend money. That’s it. Great for those hunting for meal tickets. I can afford to pay more, but I never get good results from it. Insanity is doing the same thing over and expecting different results.”

I don’t see my husband as a meal ticket. I can support myself and if it were just me living on what I could bring in, I would be able to enjoy a lot more frills than I do now, not to mention oodles more free time–I did just fine as a single gal, even on a very small income. What I can’t do, realistically, is support myself and three kids.

When I met my husband, we both made more or less exactly the same (we were both graduate students). He took me out to dinner for our first date (an inexpensive Middle Eastern place) and we went to a free foreign-language movie on campus. We were getting more serious, he took me out to dinner a number more times and we did inexpensive stuff, and then eventually (as we got very serious and I started adding up in my head how much this was costing), we started alternating who paid for dinner and at some point early on, I hosted him and 3 or 4 other people for a homemade dinner at my little apartment. We got married fifteen years ago on a mid-three digit budget (I cooked quiches for an after-wedding lunch at my apartment), combined finances, started having kids a few years later, and I haven’t had a paycheck job for nearly 12 years now (although I’ve made money off and on). I had a longish spree after my husband got his first big job, but I am now kind of a personal finance nut, a big Dave Ramsey fan, and when the time comes, I will step up and work to provide private school tuition money for our youngest, God willing. My husband is well-respected in his field and an excellent provider and I respect him very, very much for his professional achievements, his willingness to sacrifice for our children, and for the comfortable home that he is able to provide our family. From reading Catholic Answers, I know how soul-killing it can be to have a spouse who 1) overspends and/or 2) underworks.

“I understand about family and family expenses, I was one of six and I can tell you if my mother ever saw my father primarily as a meal ticket, there’s no way they would still be married in their old age. Possibly no way they would have married in the first place. Their first date was they met in a park one afternoon to play chess, they were introduced there by my father’s best friend. Imagine my mother saying you guys are too cheap! But no, she didn’t think that, she was charmed by my father’s personality and the rest is family history. That is the importance of making a genuine connection, the kind that last. That’s the connection I’m looking for and it doesn’t come via money. I think that message has been lost in the sea of those who try to justify spending more on a first or second date.”

That’s very sweet. She had to leave to eat something, though, didn’t she, unless she packed a lunch? Did she have to pack a sandwich every time she saw your dad?

Let me explain why, from the woman’s point of view, why some demonstration of generosity is important. Some guys are terribly, terribly stingy and their wives suffer a lot, or they are stingy about the stuff that is important for their wife’s or their children’s welfare, while spending like crazy on their own hobbies (their guns, their hunting, their gaming, their cars, their motorcycles, their stupid collectibles, etc.). If that’s not you, you really don’t want to accidentally leave the impression that you are stingy and/or selfish. Those guys exist every bit as much as gold-diggers do. (According to family legend, one of my deceased male relatives regifted his kids’ OWN stuff to them for Christmas.)

I don’t know if you are familiar with Dave Ramsey or his Financial Peace University course, but he has some very interesting stuff in his course about nerds (i.e. tightwads) and free spirits (i.e. spenders), two kinds of people who often wind up married to each other. He encourages the nerds to unbend and live a little and free spirits to grow up. You might want to take the course with a fiancee if you ever find somebody you’re serious about. (I’m eventually hoping to facilitate the class at our college college chaplaincy, as the locals often get engaged at the end of college.)
 
Zyxx Road,

My husband can take me to a nice lunch at the faculty center for $6 for each of us. That’s our usual date. We take the baby, have a nice lunch (and it is a very nice lunch) while the big kids are at school, and the baby usually chews on a roll. Woohoo!

I think it’s misogynistic to use the language “meal ticket” for what a nice young woman is looking for in a man. Just about any able-bodied young person can feed themselves and put a roof (of some sort) over their head. I don’t need a man to feed me. What I need my husband for is to help me feed and clothe and house and educate our children (one of whom has special needs). That is truly a very expensive and time-consuming endeavor, and I need all the help I can get.
 
I suggest Judith Martin is writing for women and doesn’t really have any idea what’s happening on the man’s side. I’m speaking as a man among many men I know with way too much negative experience with spending too much to be dismissed out of hand like that. Coffee and pastries, that still involves food without spending a lot; this is adequate for first dates. Again, I find that if a woman objects to the cheap nature of the date then she has just shown me her true nature and I will thank her for letting me know even as I delete her phone number. A girl who really likes a guy isn’t going to mind the low expense of the initial dates because she sees the bright side: the opportunity to spend time with him. If after the first few dates, they are getting along well and want to continue, then lunch or dinner is appropriate. Have to remember we’re Catholics, we’re not to rush into bed… taking time let the relationship unfold is a good thing and will allow for proper discernment for marriage.
If you won’t commit even $30-40 for a casual dinner with a woman, it’s hard for her to think you are serious. You want to make her feel special. Your initial dates shouldn’t resemble a typical night out with your friends.

Once you start dating, you can go cheap some times, and she can help pay as well. But upfront, you should be willing to pay for at least a few decent dinners.

How many things are there that guys waste $30-40 on? A new video games, and lots of guys own dozens. A night out drinking with the guys. Tickets to sporting events. Fancy cell phone and plans.

Finding the right woman is serious and important. We should be willing to invest. If you can’t spend $50 a week on dating, it seems like you’re not really ready for marriage.

God Bless
 
I appreciate the advice. And that’s not lip service either.

With that said, I really do not like the “I would have done this” and the over-discussed issue of money. I haven’t even asked her out yet and furthermore, I don’t want to overthink this. Bringing up too many extra variables is contrary to that end. It’ll just over complicate this and make it unnecessarily difficult. Let’s worry about money when it is appropriate to. Before a first date is not that time as far as I’m concerned. I just want her to have a good time with me, we’ll see where it goes from there.
 
bilop said:

“If you won’t commit even $30-40 for a casual dinner with a woman, it’s hard for her to think you are serious. You want to make her feel special. Your initial dates shouldn’t resemble a typical night out with your friends.”

Even $20 ($10 for you, $10 for her) is adequate (depending on your means, of course–a college student might have to do with less). There are lots of ethnic places with great, romantic ambiance and great food with meals just under $10. Also, how you go about doing things is as important as how much you are spending. It is possible to be gentlemanly and gracious when buying coffee, and ungentlemanly and ungracious when paying for steak.

The important thing is to communicate, “I like you, I think you’re important, and I am serious about getting to know you.” Also, it’s important to clearly distinguish the date from just friendly hanging out, which is very important for the guys who are asking out girls they know already.

rkwittem said:

“With that said, I really do not like the “I would have done this” and the over-discussed issue of money.”

Sorry, OP, we kind of forgot about your particular situation, which is that you have a pretty good idea that she’s the sort of person you’re interested in, she’s a steady church-goer, you have already talked to her, you’ve already had coffee, and it’s time to move forward. Some of the discussion upthread was about rather different situations.

“I haven’t even asked her out yet and furthermore, I don’t want to overthink this. Bringing up too many extra variables is contrary to that end. It’ll just over complicate this and make it unnecessarily difficult. Let’s worry about money when it is appropriate to. Before a first date is not that time as far as I’m concerned. I just want her to have a good time with me, we’ll see where it goes from there.”

Best wishes!
 
I don’t mind if women are looking for providers in general, but it’s vitally important which one she picks and why she picks that one. It’s important what specifically she is looking for: does she value her connection to a particular provider or does she place higher value on the status and money that a provider can give her? The second type of woman does exist and I’m being called “misogynistic” for wanting to filter them from my search. I don’t mind that a woman wants to check out my job, my wallet and my assets, but I do mind if that is the number one reason she is with me. That’s a weak spiritual foundation for a relationship.

Also, I never said be cheap after the first couple of dates. Nor did I say my parents had nothing but cheap dates following that first date. Those are assumptions written to belittle my point of view and dismiss my poor experiences. Consistently overspending on first dates was not a winning strategy for me and there have been attempts here to minimize that experience. That was my experience and there is nothing anyone can say that would minimize that. It wasn’t working and I realized over time that I should have listened to my parents more closely: the moral being that making the connection to each other is the single most important purpose of the first and second dates and everything else is secondary to that purpose. Also that I needed to work harder on myself spiritually and mentally in order to do my part to make that connection happen. Money is just a short cut both sexes use. Nice to have, ok for women to make it a requirement in a man they are serious about, but it can’t be the primary basis if she is serious about having a marriage for life. That connection is what helps the couple ride out the inevitable tough times that surface in every relationship. That connection is why my parents are still married.

I believe that the time to be monetarily generous with a woman is AFTER the connection has been made. I have never been stingy in this regard and this policy has worked well for me. One year I spent thousands courting a girl… after connecting with her during a few early inexpensive dates. It didn’t work out in the end, but I have no regrets and would not hesitate to do it that way again.

okay, I’ve crapped on this thread enough, I’m out, let the young man enjoy his romance. My detractors can have the last word… God bless y’all
 
Zzyxz Road said:

“I don’t mind if women are looking for providers in general, but it’s vitally important which one she picks and why she picks that one. It’s important what specifically she is looking for: does she value her connection to a particular provider or does she place higher value on the status and money that a provider can give her? The second type of woman does exist and I’m being called “misogynistic” for wanting to filter them from my search. I don’t mind that a woman wants to check out my job, my wallet and my assets, but I do mind if that is the number one reason she is with me. That’s a weak spiritual foundation for a relationship.”

How about looking for a good woman (and checking for positive qualities), rather than filtering out bad ones? You sound really burnt out on this process.

(You have my blessing to filter out any young woman who refers to herself as a “princess,” has a “[Name of University] Princess” sticker on her car, has a t-shirt that says “princess” on it or who owns a sparkly princess Bible. Leave her to play with her My Little Ponies.)

“Consistently overspending on first dates was not a winning strategy for me and there have been attempts here to minimize that experience. That was my experience and there is nothing anyone can say that would minimize that.”

You weren’t meeting these materialistic young women while volunteering at a soup kitchen or at Habitat for Humanity or decorating the church for Christmas or at a Catechism study group, were you? If you started with a better pool of women, you’d get better results. If your initial filter is “ooh, pretty!” then you get what you’ve been getting.

“I believe that the time to be monetarily generous with a woman is AFTER the connection has been made. I have never been stingy in this regard and this policy has worked well for me. One year I spent thousands courting a girl… after connecting with her during a few early inexpensive dates. It didn’t work out in the end, but I have no regrets and would not hesitate to do it that way again.”

I think you spent way too much, but if you had a good time and you had the money, no big deal.

Good luck, and don’t punish good women for the fact that when you were first dating, you couldn’t tell the difference between a good woman and a bad one.
 
Zzyxz Road,

I should mention that I married the first man to buy me dinner, and I was the first woman he’d ever bought dinner (even though he was 24 at the time), so I’m not the jaded veteran of a hundred failed first dates like it sounds you are. I’d dated other people (one to the point of probably dozens of marriage proposals) and kissed a couple of frogs, but never gotten taken to dinner before (I was 22 when I met my future husband).

I’m not saying to buy every woman you see dinner (in fact I think I said that a couple times), but once there’s a girl you like and you know she’s a basically good person, why waste time with games like the coffee-and-danish test?
 
Sorry, OP, we kind of forgot about your particular situation, which is that you have a pretty good idea that she’s the sort of person you’re interested in, she’s a steady church-goer, you have already talked to her, you’ve already had coffee, and it’s time to move forward. Some of the discussion upthread was about rather different situations.

“I haven’t even asked her out yet and furthermore, I don’t want to overthink this. Bringing up too many extra variables is contrary to that end. It’ll just over complicate this and make it unnecessarily difficult. Let’s worry about money when it is appropriate to. Before a first date is not that time as far as I’m concerned. I just want her to have a good time with me, we’ll see where it goes from there.”

Best wishes!
Thanks, tomorrow is the day. I’m simultaneously (terribly) nervous and pulse-poundingly excited. Not a pleasant mix.
 
Thanks, tomorrow is the day. I’m simultaneously (terribly) nervous and pulse-poundingly excited. Not a pleasant mix.
You will do fine. Sounds like both of you have God in your life, which is a great place to be.

DGB
 
She left right after Mass ended. She didn’t see me, we didn’t talk, and I didn’t get to ask her out…more than a little irritated/frustrated right now. Feel powerless. :mad:
 
Bummer. You have a brief window between Thanksgiving and the week before Christmas and then it’s going to be tough to impossible for the next couple weeks.

I find it’s tough to do ANYTHING between mid-November and the second week of January.
 
I don’t think it will be that hard. Her job gives her Christmas Eve to Jan 2 off. Who knows…
 
I hate reviving an oldish thread, but it’s better than making a new one, I think. Anyway, one week after missing out on talking to her, she saw me on Sunday after mass (not like I was hiding), and we chatted for a bit. (Work, Thanksgiving, etc.) She cleans the parish offices, so I walked with her to them, as they’re in a separate building. Before she and I split paths, we had this exchange:

Me- “Before you go, I have something I want to ask you. What’s your schedule like this week?”
Her: “It’s pretty busy/full.” (She works for the diocese, I’ve learned- understandable this time of year, I’d imagine.)
Me: “How does Saturday look?”
Her: “Hmm…well there’s the parish advent/Xmas festival so I’ll be busy with that. I’m sure I’ll see you at Mass next Sunday, let’s talk then.”

It would appear that I’m “in” or that she’s interested at the very least. Her body language was good during all of this (big smile, faced ne, eye contact). She came off as receptive and she left the door open proactively without me having to push the envelope. The only thing that went wrong, other than not getting an actual date out of the deal, was that I feel I wasn’t specific enough when I asked what her schedule looked like. I think it might’ve been better if I’d just said, ‘I want to take you out on a date’ compared to what I did. I felt in the moment that my intentions were clear, but in retrospect, they might not have been. Kind of bugging me at the moment. Might just be over-analysis on my part.
 
rkwittem said:

“The only thing that went wrong, other than not getting an actual date out of the deal, was that I feel I wasn’t specific enough when I asked what her schedule looked like.”

Nah, I think it went pretty much as well as could be expected, given that this is genuinely a very busy time of year for her. You asked about the week and she said she wasn’t available this week, but encouraged you to try again next week. That’s good. What you want to avoid is accidentally having this conversation:

Him: Would you like to go out with me sometime?

Her: No.

See, in that case, he is too vague and opens the conversation up to her telling him to buzz off FOREVER.

The only thing I would suggest doing better next time is to actually have an activity to suggest. Example: “I hear that there’s a new Middle Eastern place downtown and I was hoping you could join me for lunch and window shopping on Saturday” or “There’s a temporary exhibit at the museum that I’ve been wanting to go to and we could go there and then have dinner together.”

I think anything that includes lots of walking around is good–it’s easier and more comfortable to talk when you have subject matter right in front of you and there’s less pressure when you’re not face to face the whole time.
 
I have a plan, but not much walking (we just got a ton of snow). What I want to do is go out to dinner with her at like 5:30. The after-dinner plan is to visit the local planetarium’s Christmas show at 7. Not sure what they talk about, but it’s Christmas-themed and will offer plenty of talking points for dinner. I’ll also probably ask, if the date goes well and whatnot to sit with her at Mass next Sunday.
 
Nice. She sounds lovely. Good luck and God Bless.

BTW - be careful not to give us too many details in case she visits catholic.com! 😃
 
Nice. She sounds lovely. Good luck and God Bless.

BTW - be careful not to give us too many details in case she visits catholic.com! 😃
Ha, yeah I did think of that the other day. Definitely for the best, I agree. Friend of mine suggested I do something smaller, like an evening ice cream/coffee/snack date. I personally feel dinner is no big deal and want to have a nice long get-to-know-her over dinner. The quandary is simple- dinner can be an intimidating venture for ladies that adds a lot of pressuee to the situation- pressuere that not many would like, I tend to think. My gut says to do a dinner date like the one I just suggested, but a trusted, close friend suggests I start on the lighter side and build from there.
 
rkwittem said:

“The quandary is simple- dinner can be an intimidating venture for ladies that adds a lot of pressuee to the situation- pressuere that not many would like, I tend to think. My gut says to do a dinner date like the one I just suggested, but a trusted, close friend suggests I start on the lighter side and build from there.”

As a happy medium, try a cute, atmospheric, inexpensive ethnic place and avoid any place that gives you too many forks.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top