C
C.Ray
Guest
We have plenty of time.It’s a long story.
We have plenty of time.It’s a long story.
willingness to tackle difficult issues (even if they cause fracture)
I am not sure about others, but those are things Catholic Church definitely has. On the other hand as GKMotley often says, Anglicans tend to be split on various issues which I think actually contradicts your 1st point (in-fact being in communion does not necessarily mean sharing exactly same faith about Apostolic Succession or Eucharist or female priesthood…). As for your second point, I think that people are quite involved in life of Church nowadays. There aren’t nearly enough Priests so that becomes a necessity…pronounced involvement of laity in the life, ministry and governance of the church
What do you mean by this? The Catholic Church is #1 charity organization so I’d hope we can at least say She isn’t lacking in this regardstrong commitment to social outreach
willingness to tackle difficult issues (even if they cause fracture)
I am not sure about others, but those are things Catholic Church definitely has. On the other hand as GKMotley often says, Anglicans tend to be split on various issues which I think actually contradicts your 1st point (in-fact being in communion does not necessarily mean sharing exactly same faith about Apostolic Succession or Eucharist or female priesthood…). As for your second point, I think that people are quite involved in life of Church nowadays. There aren’t nearly enough Priests so that becomes a necessity…pronounced involvement of laity in the life, ministry and governance of the church
Because of this:Is this the case in other Protestant churches. Is the bar so low that pretty much anyone can come and go as they please with very little in the way of commitment?
Let me explain. Anglican Church does not require many beliefs beside core ones. You can view Apostolic Succession as necessary or as non-existent and both are okay. You can view female priesthood as invalid or desirable and both are okay. Hence rules are always set for least demanding acceptable view.inclusivity
Because Anglicans can view Eucharist as mere symbol, since Anglicans can view Church in light of branch theory, since Anglicans can view Sola Scriptura as prime belief, there is this interpretation no need for Sunday obligation and actually no logic in it. Again, rules are set for least demanding belief and that is this one.the is no Sunday obligation
Same as above. Plus historically it cut free days of peasants which helped nobility but sshhhno holy days of obligation
Sola Christi and Sola Fide both contradict need to Fast. Both can be held by Anglican hence rules are set for them because they are least demanding.no requirement to fast or abstain
Sola Scriptura contradicts devotions. Historically Protestantism has been opposed to Catholicism and Devotions, Anglicanism was no exception. But there are certainly groups of Anglicans who have many Devotions (Cardinal St. Newman actually belonged to such group before he became Catholic).very little in the way of devotions
This is probably to not offend anyone. Since homosexuality is viewed as sin in Bible but at the same time it is alright to have homosexual relations even if one is part of clergy, this might be some consequence of similar developments in Anglican Church. Maybe there is other reason but I can’t see one. Our Priest started doing this when he became too focused on mercy of God while not paying attention to fact God is also just so that might be just theological thing.sin is often discussed of in social terms as opposed to personal terms
Not in my portion of the Anglican zoo.Anglican Church does not require many beliefs beside core ones. You can view Apostolic Succession as necessary or as non-existent and both are okay. You can view female priesthood as invalid or desirable and both are okay. Hence rules are always set for least demanding acceptable view.
I am Catholic, but I use that prayer occasionally. From the 1812 prayer book unless memory fails, “We are not so worthy as to gather crumbs from under thy table…” Very nice prayer.The prayer before the Eucharist is the general confession, followed by the general absolution, from the celebrant or the Bishop, if present. Which Anglicans consider as efficacious as the also available individual auricular confession.
That’s my point. In another portion different things are allowed or the norm.Not in my portion of the Anglican zoo.
What confuses me is the existence of the Anglican Communion, and the Archbishop. While I personally think the parishes of the Continuum are likely more authentic to what I know of Anglican heritage than many other Anglican groups, they aren’t recognized as part of the Anglican Zoo by the Communion.Yes. Which is also the point, of my board name. By portion of the zoo, I was saying that there are Anglicans who do not allow that latitude of interpretation as acceptable. It will depend on which Anglicans one is speaking of. You can find that variance within Anglicanism considered in the broadest sense (motley be the brood)… But an Anglican who does not (inter alia) accept females as valid recipients for Orders will not blithely accept others who do. That is the sort of thing that divides the general breed and produced the Anglican Continuum, over the past 45 years…
I think it would be more accurate to say individual Churches are not recognised by the Communion as part of the Communion unless they are … part of the Communion. Being part of the Communion means being in communion with Cantuar, being invited to the Lambeth Conference, and being accepted into the Anglican Consultative Council. That doesn’t mean Churches within the Communion necessarily discount Churches without as being “non-Anglican”. (Indeed, as @GKMotley has pointed out, ACNA is sort of unofficially half in).While I personally think the parishes of the Continuum are likely more authentic to what I know of Anglican heritage than many other Anglican groups, they aren’t recognized as part of the Anglican Zoo by the Communion
There is no “obligation” in the Catholic sense of the word in the Reformed tradition. We see the “obligation” perhaps a bit differently (although I’m sure many Catholics see it exactly the same way).Is this the case in other Protestant churches.
(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)The Continuum is only a name of convenience,