No I don’t.
Don’t believe everything you see in a video. What you should do is look around at real life and at the violence and injustice spawned by Islam. Look at the lack of evidence for Mohammed’s revelation and question the reason for burning the Quran and substituting Usman’s word.
Really? How can you prove that? Because Mohammed said so?
Since Mohammed wasnt’ there and you can’t prove that the Quran is the Word of God, I choose to believe the Church whose Scriptures were written by eyewitnesses to the event.
Because Muslims are very gullible. You choose to believe based on blind faith in a man who, by his own admission, taught that lying was a virtue and that he would change his revelation to suit his pleasure, especially when it came to having sexual relations even with othe men’s wives.
In other words, you have no proof to the charge that the Bible was corrupted. The burden of proof is on Islam. Islam claims that the Bible was corrupted then they must provide a copy of an uncorrupted Bible that predates the copies we have today.
There is indeed an objective method to test and ascertain the veracity and divine origin of the Qur’an… or any other scripture for that matter.
Your video just proves that Christianity is not afraid of criticism. Can u supply videos critical of Islam?
If that were true then you’d not have Muhammed as the speaker of the ‘word of god’.
But your god claims he deceived people!
So if a book turned up called “The Gospel of Jesus” then by *logic *(ironic you’re using that term in this type of argument) you’d be more willing to believe that because Jesus was even more closer to the events.
The Koran has plenty of contradictions in it
Already, in these forums we have identified many errors in the Quran and we haven’t even gone through the whole Quran. I’ll just mention one which we discussed recently, the Quran says that Mary is part of the Holy Trinity. Clearly, the Quran fails the test.
with the example of crucifixion, if the Quran is the literal word of Allah then Allah must be a gnostic.
there are people who conveted to Christianity from Islam. They used to believe what you believe in sincerely, but they converted, sincerly. Allah always fails his subjective arguments no matter how much you want to present them as objective. It is US who decide if the challenge is met or not because the challenhe is for US, not you, since you are automatically called kafir if you believe the challenge is met. Which proves that your deity was unable to give a book that all people find miraculous.
Is this another part of inspired writing in the Bible?
hamba2han; the guy’s unintentionally funny. I don’t think he means to be, that is.
but am willing, for argument’s sake, to say it was the apostle Peter or John who wrote it . Is Hamba willing to accept everything they say or as usual, pick and choose as Muhammad did? isn’t it fascinating that even the apocrypha bears witness against Muhammad? isn’t it fascinating that the apocrypha says explicitly Jesus is God yet we reject it? isn’t it fascinating that the apocrypha mentions nothing of Muhammad or his teachings?
Well he wanted to accept Barnabas - becuase it predicts Muhammed. He reeled back though when I said it might show that Jesus was substituted on the cross.but am willing, for argument’s sake, to say it was the apostle Peter or John who wrote it . Is Hamba willing to accept everything they say or as usual, pick and choose as Muhammad did? isn’t it fascinating that even the apocrypha bears witness against Muhammad? isn’t it fascinating that the apocrypha says explicitly Jesus is God yet we reject it? isn’t it fascinating that the apocrypha mentions nothing of Muhammad or his teachings?
How’d they manage that when you say the Jews corrupted the message?
Dear Porkscratchings, If you want to measure the value of your head, you are welcome to produce a video critical to Islam. Perhaps, you can share the apartment of Salman Rusdhie. (Just Kidding…pal
)