The Bishops and Music

  • Thread starter Thread starter Elzee
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
E

Elzee

Guest
Anybody hear anything on what the Bishops decided upon in regard to music to be used at Mass? I heard on EWTN they discussed this topic, and I thought, approved a document to be shared. Anybody know anything?

Did they get rid of “Sing a New Church” and “Anthem”!!! :gopray2:
 
The USCCB Committee on Divine Worship finally returned my call this afternoon. The document should be up on its website within the next two weeks.

I’m afraid that it is a paper tiger wiht little teeth. 😦 However, before any of us make a judgment (myself, included), let’s see what the document has to say, first and foremost.

What upset me the most is that it failed to pass by the 2/3 majority necessary to send it to Rome for recognitio (approval). That being said, I’m afraid that those of you who were praying for the status quo got your wish. However, as I said before, I’ll give the USCCB the chance to post the document. I hope that I am wrong, but from the looks of it, I doubt it.🤷
 
What upset me the most is that it failed to pass by the 2/3 majority necessary to send it to Rome for recognitio (approval). That being said, I’m afraid that those of you who were praying for the status quo got your wish. However, as I said before, I’ll give the USCCB the chance to post the document. I hope that I am wrong, but from the looks of it, I doubt it.🤷
If it’s not approved by Rome, then technically, it has no ‘authority’ behind it, correct? Doesn’t it just become a “recommendation by some U.S. Bishops”?

I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt, too, but like you, I’m not hopeful.

Pray for our U.S. Bishops.
 
The USCCB Committee on Divine Worship finally returned my call this afternoon. The document should be up on its website within the next two weeks.

I’m afraid that it is a paper tiger wiht little teeth. 😦 However, before any of us make a judgment (myself, included), let’s see what the document has to say, first and foremost.

What upset me the most is that it failed to pass by the 2/3 majority necessary to send it to Rome for recognitio (approval). That being said, I’m afraid that those of you who were praying for the status quo got your wish. However, as I said before, I’ll give the USCCB the chance to post the document. I hope that I am wrong, but from the looks of it, I doubt it.🤷
Is there any way that we can find out who voted for it and who voted against it?
 
benedictgal
What upset me the most is that it failed to pass by the 2/3 majority necessary to send it to Rome for recognitio (approval). That being said, I’m afraid that those of you who were praying for the status quo got your wish. However, as I said before, I’ll give the USCCB the chance to post the document. I hope that I am wrong, but from the looks of it, I doubt it.🤷
😃

Jim
 
Jim, I would expect that from you because you have no sense of the sacred. :eek: Anyone who thinks that sacred music began with the St. Louis Jesuits obviously doesn’t understand sacred Tradition. After all, Gregorian Chant is still the default form of sacred music. For those of us who do have that sense of sacred tradition, it’s pretty sad.

However, if I were you, I wouldn’t be too quick to sing “O Glory” yet. As disappointed as I am with the process, none of us have seen the document. It may wind up knocking off some of the tripe that we are forced to endure from OCP Sunday after Sunday.
 
Is there any way that we can find out who voted for it and who voted against it?
In the Texas Legislature, you can look up who voted for what and how. Unfortunately, because the USCCB doesn’t work that way, we have no way of knowing, unless, of course, you ask your bishop outright.
 
In the Texas Legislature, you can look up who voted for what and how. Unfortunately, because the USCCB doesn’t work that way, we have no way of knowing, unless, of course, you ask your bishop outright.
That is unfortunate. Were there any reporters from EWTN who would know exactly how each bishop voted?
 
That is unfortunate. Were there any reporters from EWTN who would know exactly how each bishop voted?
We should email Raymond Arroyo that question. Evidently, he thought it was okay, but, it still helps to get some sort of clarification. Here’s his email address:

worldover@ewtn.com

Maybe he’ll answer. I was rather peeved with EWTN because I thought that Friday’s World Over would be a call-in edition. Unfortunately, it was not.
 
Jim, I would expect that from you because you have no sense of the sacred. :eek: Anyone who thinks that sacred music began with the St. Louis Jesuits obviously doesn’t understand sacred Tradition. After all, Gregorian Chant is still the default form of sacred music. For those of us who do have that sense of sacred tradition, it’s pretty sad.

However, if I were you, I wouldn’t be too quick to sing “O Glory” yet. As disappointed as I am with the process, none of us have seen the document. It may wind up knocking off some of the tripe that we are forced to endure from OCP Sunday after Sunday.
“Default” does not mean there other types should not be used. There is no movement to go away from Gregorian Chant, but very few parishes are set up to do it even on special days. Modern music works well for the modern parishes for the people, choirs and music ministers. GC will be used interspersed with other music genres as it is now.
 
benedictgal
Jim, I would expect that from you because you have no sense of the sacred. :eek: Anyone who thinks that sacred music began with the St. Louis Jesuits obviously doesn’t understand sacred Tradition.
You’re presuming to know what I think is sacred or not. :rolleyes:

FYI, just because I like the St. Louis Jesuits music, doesn’t mean I prefer it over Gregorian Chant, in all cases.

Jim
 
We should email Raymond Arroyo that question. Evidently, he thought it was okay, but, it still helps to get some sort of clarification. Here’s his email address:

worldover@ewtn.com

Maybe he’ll answer. I was rather peeved with EWTN because I thought that Friday’s World Over would be a call-in edition. Unfortunately, it was not.
I sent Mr. Arroyo a message. I will let you know if I hear anything.
 
“Default” does not mean there other types should not be used. There is no movement to go away from Gregorian Chant, but very few parishes are set up to do it even on special days. Modern music works well for the modern parishes for the people, choirs and music ministers. GC will be used interspersed with other music genres as it is now.
Oh, but that is what the documents say regarding Gregorian Chant. New Ulm, have you read anything official from Rome or are you, as usual, shooting up in the sky and hoping a duck will fall out of the sky? So far, your aim has pretty much fallen flat.

Allow me to let someone greater than I (and your moniker) tackle your erroneous statement on modern music:
Three developments in recent music epitomize the problems that the Church has to face when she is considering liturgical music.
First of all, there is the cultural universalization that the Church has to undertake if she wants to get beyond the boundaries of the European mind. This is the question of what inculturation should look like in the realm of sacred music if, on the one hand, the identity of Christianity is to be preserved and, on the other, its universality is to be expressed in local forms.
Then there are two developments in music itself that have their origins primarily in the West but that for a long time have affected the whole of mankind in the world culture that is being formed. Modern so-called “classical” music has maneuvered itself, with some exceptions, into an elitist ghetto, which only specialists may enter – and even they do so with what may sometimes be mixed feelings. The music of the masses has broken loose from this and treads a very different path.
On the one hand, there is pop music, which is certainly no longer supported by the people in the ancient sense (populus). It is aimed at the phenomenon of the masses, is industrially produced, and ultimately has to be described as a cult of the banal. “Rock”, on the other hand, is the expression of elemental passions, and at rock festivals it assumes a cultic character, a form of worship, in fact, in opposition to Christian worship. People are, so to speak, released from themselves by the emotional shock of rhythm, noise, and special lighting effects. However, in the ecstasy of having all their defenses torn down, the participants sink, as it were, beneath the elemental force of the universe. The music of the Holy Spirit’s sober inebriation seems to have little chance when self has become a prison, the mind is a shackle, and breaking out from both appears as a true promise of redemption that can be tasted at least for a few moments.
This comes from Spirit of the LIturgy, written by then-Cardinal Ratzinger, makes a very telling commentary regarding today’s “modern” music. You say that this is just his opinion, but, many of the things he wrote as a Cardinal are now the backbone for the reforms he is slowly fashioning as Pope.
 
Oh, but that is what the documents say regarding Gregorian Chant. New Ulm, have you read anything official from Rome or are you, as usual, shooting up in the sky and hoping a duck will fall out of the sky? So far, your aim has pretty much fallen flat.

Allow me to let someone greater than I (and your moniker) tackle your erroneous statement on modern music:

This comes from Spirit of the LIturgy, written by then-Cardinal Ratzinger, makes a very telling commentary regarding today’s “modern” music. You say that this is just his opinion, but, many of the things he wrote as a Cardinal are now the backbone for the reforms he is slowly fashioning as Pope.
From what I’m reading, he was talking about Rock and Roll, music. Also, I remember when then Cardinal Ratzinger published this. He was in fact addressing the problem in Europe, where Rock and Roll music was being used at Mass, especially wedding Masses.

He wasn’t talking about modern liturgical music such as the St. Louis Jesusts have produced or other contemporary composers.

BTW, did they use Gregorian Chant exclusively at the World Youth Day Masses? :rolleyes:

Jim
 
We should email Raymond Arroyo that question. Evidently, he thought it was okay, but, it still helps to get some sort of clarification. Here’s his email address:

worldover@ewtn.com

Maybe he’ll answer. I was rather peeved with EWTN because I thought that Friday’s World Over would be a call-in edition. Unfortunately, it was not.
Here’s the answer I got.
Dear Laura,

Unfortunately, we aren’t privy to the votes of the individual bishops. We only see the overall results after voting is closed on each item.
Thanks for watching.
Christopher Edwards
EWTNews
 
BTW, if the Bishops vote on a secret ballot, no one will know how each Bishop voted.

But what does it matter if we know or not? The Church isn’t a republic where we can vote out the Bishop who represents us, if we don’t like how he votes on issues.

Jim
 
Oh, but that is what the documents say regarding Gregorian Chant. New Ulm, have you read anything official from Rome or are you, as usual, shooting up in the sky and hoping a duck will fall out of the sky? So far, your aim has pretty much fallen flat.

Allow me to let someone greater than I (and your moniker) tackle your erroneous statement on modern music:

This comes from Spirit of the LIturgy, written by then-Cardinal Ratzinger, makes a very telling commentary regarding today’s “modern” music. You say that this is just his opinion, but, many of the things he wrote as a Cardinal are now the backbone for the reforms he is slowly fashioning as Pope.
I have talked about policies and paper and how they are best applied in the real world. No need to rehash it now.

And he is only one Cardinal, only one opinion, and far from infallible (not official in this instance). Remember each layer down from Rome allows for local variances (I think Jim posted on that in another music thread).

GC is not going away, when done correctly it can be beautiful, but even then is no more spiritual than other genres. It is just one tool in the musical toolbox.
 
BTW, if the Bishops vote on a secret ballot, no one will know how each Bishop voted.

But what does it matter if we know or not? The Church isn’t a republic where we can vote out the Bishop who represents us, if we don’t like how he votes on issues.

Jim
No, it’s not, nor is it a democracy. However, it would be interesting to see which Bishops stood with the Holy Father and Liturgicam Authenticam on this one item and who didn’t.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top