M
mfbukowski
Guest
bukovinaTry it for what?
bukovinaTry it for what?
Indeed there is great confusion. Since you were so kind as to repost Chris’ remarks, you can see from the first sentence that he referred to the entire bible, not simply the NT. That he used, as examples, books FROM the NT did not mean that he was referring only to the NT, especially since he specifically said “bible” in the first sentence, not “New Testament.” As well, given that he DID include the entire bible in that first sentence, and then followed it up with the claim that the bible took men thousands of years to write, it is not reasonable to assume that he was referring only to the NT in the absence of any claim by him that he was indeed referring to the NT.I can see there is **great confusion. ** Let me attempt to break it down.
You claim I said St. Jerome wrote the NT (and then gave me the definition of author) - I did not.
You claim that I assume he wrote it and was not the translator - I did not.
You said I give more credit for the actual content than for being a really good translator - I did not.
Obviously Diana, the reason for bringing up St. Jerome and providing the commentary from the Introduction to the Douay-Rheims Bible online was for one purpose:
To show that if St. Jerome was translating the New Testament in the **years 342-420, **obviously **thousands of years had not passed **from the time of Jesus to the time of St. Jerome’s translations.
So you (chris, Mormons) are saying that it took **thousands of years **to write all of the Bible; the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament?Indeed there is great confusion. Since you were so kind as to repost Chris’ remarks, you can see from the first sentence that he referred to the entire bible, not simply the NT. That he used, as examples, books FROM the NT did not mean that he was referring only to the NT, especially since he specifically said “bible” in the first sentence, not “New Testament.” As well, given that he DID include the entire bible in that first sentence, and then followed it up with the claim that the bible took men thousands of years to write, it is not reasonable to assume that he was referring only to the NT in the absence of any claim by him that he was indeed referring to the NT.
So yes, there is confusion. I believe that it is on your part, assuming that Chris was claiming that the New Testament took thousands of years to write. There is nothing in his post that would cause someone to think that this was his claim, y’know, especially since the word he used in the first sentence was “bible,” not “New Testament.”
There is also this: Mormons are all quite aware that the NT was written over a space of less than a hundred years. It is also a part of LDS thought that the 'Stick of Judah" refers to the bible as a whole, both OT and NT. Chris’s use of NT books as examples do not mean that he was referring only to the NT–as can clearly be seen in the context.
I can see what the problem is…you did indeed think he was referring only to the NT. However, his post clearly shows that he was referring to the entire work.
Uh…So you (chris, Mormons) are saying that it took **thousands of years **to write all of the Bible; the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament?
Also they were originally individual books?
Please explain how the BoM is analagous to the Bible. Please include the part where it was found on Gold Plates that no longer exist for a single person to examine. While you’re at it, maybe you’d like to try answering my other question I asked earlier related to this.Ummmm… Do you know how the Bible was put together? Have you forgotten or do you not know?
The books of the Bible were written over thousands of years and were originally individual books like “The Gospel According to St John” and “The First Epistle General of Peter”, etc written on paprus scrolls. To make a copy, they had to pain-stakingly copy each word by hand to another scroll. Bible comes from the Greek word “Biblia” meaning “books”. It was made up of many books. It wasn’t until much later that it became known as “The Book”.
The Bible is the stick of Judah (written by the Jews or descendants of Judah). The Book of Mormon is the stick of Joseph (written by the descendants of Joseph). Don’t forget, Judah and Joseph were the lead tribes in ancient Israel. Together they both testify that Jesus is the Christ.
So you (chris, Mormons) are saying that it took **thousands of years **to write all of the Bible; the Hebrew Bible and the New Testament?
Also they were originally individual books?
I took you off of ignore for this post, and for any answer you might make to it. (Edited) I would like to ask you…are you of the opinion that the OT was written by one person just before Christ came along? Who do you think wrote it?I was trying to think of why this is…I can only think it has something to do with their notion that the Creation narratives in Genesis took place c.6000 BC. But I’m not sure what they think the origins of Genesis are.
At any rate, there are many areas of religious history where LDS replace historic fact with belief.
Do Mormons believe the events of Genesis took place 6000BC or the Book of Genesis was written 6000BC?I was trying to think of why this is…I can only think it has something to do with their notion that the Creation narratives in Genesis took place c.6000 BC. But I’m not sure what they think the origins of Genesis are.
At any rate, there are many areas of religious history where LDS replace historic fact with belief.
Neither.Do Mormons believe the events of Genesis took place 6000BC or the Book of Genesis was written 6000BC?
(Edited)I took you off of ignore for this post, and for any answer you might make to it. (Edited) I would like to ask you…are you of the opinion that the OT was written by one person just before Christ came along? Who do you think wrote it?
I’d say this is the real reason you deemed me worthy of your attentions.by the way, just to remark upon your continued claim that Mormons are all strict creationists, I need to remind you that we are not. SOME are, but the church itself has no official stand on the matter one way or the other, and the vast majority of us run the gamut between strict creationism and a belief in full blown natural (if divinely guided) evolution. Since BYU has one of the nation’s best evolutionary biology departments in the nation, I think that your continued inaccurate and disparaging characterization of LDS doctrine in this area, especially in the face of many, MANY corrections, undermines your credibility as a source of information regarding such things.
Refusing to acquiesce to their leaders’ demands (of forbidding the teaching evolution at BYU), the three professors in question, Henry and Joseph Peterson and Ralph Chamberlin, were dismissed or fired for being out of harmony with the authorities of the church. When students and faculty protested, they were chastised for ‘dictating’ to ‘the prophets.’ (Dan Erickson, Dialogue 30:2, page 9)
Hello Rebecca,ps: books were developed by the Romans, c. the first century AD. Hebrew writing developed in the late 2nd to early 1st millenia BC. The oldest texts of the Torah are from the 10th century BC. The current was solidified in the 6th to 5th century BC…hardly “thousands of years”. All the texts of the NT were written in the first 120 years following Christ’s death and resurrection.
But no mormon has yet to explain this “thousands of years” to write the Bible.
Oral torah.Hello Rebecca,
What is your opinion on where the stories came from before they got written into the Torah around 10BC?
Oh sorry! Okay. Thanks for the clarification.Oral torah.
10th century BC, not 10BC.
Sorry to take so long to respond. I have been busy with family (I do have a life outside of CAFI am truly bemused here…I feel like I’m walking into a whole new world of 'say, what?" as if my understanding of Catholic thought is entirely off in this area. I have been assuming that Catholics believed as we do about this topic; that the Pentateuch, Proverbs, the books of Job, Isaiah and Malachi as well as the Song of Songs and all the other books in the OT were written by different people over many hundreds and thousands (at least three thousand, if not more) of years, and these works were protected and handed down through the generations to Christ.
Am I wrong? If so, what IS the belief regarding the authorship of the OT? You have me intensely curious.
Problem, that.The reason it was difficult to answer the question re: when the Old Testament was written is that there is no clear-cut answer.
There is Jewish oral tradition. There is Moses who began the written period of Hebrew text. There is the fact that Jewish teachings put Abraham living 175 years showing that we are not sure if the Bible is to be taken literally. And there is the introduction, more recently, of archaelogical artifacts that are adding a new perspective to the timeline of the Hebrew Bible.
As a result, one cannot come up with an exact date. However, based on everything I have read, it did not take thousands of years to write the bible.
Remember, the word write indicates authorship as Diana pointed out.
Now, one can ask the question “How long did it take for Judaism and Christianity to evolve?” If chris was referring to that, it would possibly cover about 2,000 years from the beginning of Judaism to the beginning of Christianity.
There again,** it is not correct to say **(as chris did) **that the Bible took thousands of ****years to **write.
chris - What language did God use when speaking to JS?
Who did the translating - God or Joseph Smith???
Exactly.
Thats why I said I wanted to see the original source documents,
how very convenient that Joseph Smith was not “allowed” to keep the supposed golden plates.
“Alpha” and “Omega” were already translated/interpreted inside the original text into “the beginning” and “the end”.
So why did’nt Joseph Smith just use the first letter and the last letter of the original language, instead of using the first letter and the last letter of the Greek alphabet?
And as for the French word “adieu”, just because it is in the dictionary at the time, does’nt mean that it was commonly used. Unless there is a source document that says the French word “adieu” became commonly used, like a special dictionary of commonly used words, then people can be skeptical.
There are people that say Joseph Smith copied many parts of The Holy Bible,
the fact that he checked out a copy of The Holy Bible from a library several times makes people believe that Joseph Smith copied “Alpha” and “Omega” from the Book of Revelation.