The church is losing touch with working-class Catholics

  • Thread starter Thread starter RCIAGraduateAlt2
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I do see this attitude in the Church, a growing contingent that seriously only care about combating abortion, socialism, feminism, immodesty, and same-sex attraction. Any other topic seems to be dismissed as people are whining and not wanting to be real Catholics.
 
Great points @benjammin. I think many are to easy to dismiss these concerns because they are branded “left” or “woke” or whatever and they miss that this is keeping to the gospel. And the right often takes advantage of blind devotion as a way to pass policies that do undercut the marginalized and benefit the wealthy. Politics are the true religion of many. I think there are good and bad to both sides so I have pure allegiance to neither.
 
Last edited:
The issue I have is that there are a lot of conservatives ( socially anyways) working class people and it’s either join with the woke or get lip service or don’t focus on real issues for working people. I wish we had more of this but sadly I find that a lot of conservative Catholics are becoming middle class twits who could care less about folks like us and feel we should either work harder to get ahead or they go left and pity us. Just treat us like people.
 
Last edited:
The issue I have is that there are a lot of conservatives ( socially anyways) working class people and it’s either join with the work or get lip service or don’t focus on real issues for working people. I wish we had more of this but sadly I find that a lot of conservative Catholics are becoming middle class twits who could care less about folks like us and feel we should either work harder to get ahead or they go left and pity us. Just treat us like people.
Yet people claim all these other reasons are the core reasons why people leave the Church. I haven’t met one Catholic that left because of some of the reasons I see in these forums but have many ex-Catholic friends who complain about the Church being out-of-touch with their real life and only concerned about a few issues. That’s real. A lot of this oh people are leaving over “confusion”, I haven’t seen evidence of.
 
No, because of work they are having are having time attending and it makes sense for there to be some Masses times that cater to them which is the main point in the article.
Yes, this!

At my daughter’s college (a Catholic college), there was a Mass on Sunday night at 10:00 p.m. It was one of the best -attended Masses on Sunday!

The reason it was well-attended is that many college students were able to attend it–it was convenient.

If they went home for the weekend, they were generally back on campus by 10:00 p.m. And if they didn’t go home for the weekend, they could party on Saturday night, sleep in on Sunday morning–and still attend that late-night Sunday Mass!

And a lot of the public attended this Mass, too–it was do-able for them.

My daughter used to enjoy singing in the choir at that Mass–yes, they had a choir! So it wasn’t just one of those “half-hour Masses” with no music.

I think it makes sense to survey the membership of a parish (easy enough to do in this day of email), and try to figure out times that more people could attend obligation Masses. To me, this shows a caring attitude towards people, not a kow-towing to “lazy” people.

As for weekday Masses–these are not required, and it concerns me that on this thread, they are being spoken of as though everyone should try to make it to daily Masses. When I am off work, I often attend a daily Mass (they’re very short–only about 30 minutes). But unfortunately, my day off is also the time when I book doctor/dentist appts, try to get big cleaning jobs done, plan menus and cook–in other words, I’m not just sitting around watching TV. And even if I were just sitting around watching TV–again, these Masses are not an obligation and no one should be judged for not attending.
 
I do see this attitude in the Church, a growing contingent that seriously only care about combating abortion, socialism, feminism, immodesty, and same-sex attraction. Any other topic seems to be dismissed as people are whining and not wanting to be real Catholics.
Are you aware that the Catholic Church is the worlds largest non-governmental charitable organization? That charity extends from urban areas to rural areas, in just about any country, in any disaster or famine. The Church is enormously attuned to the needs of the impoverished.

The issues you are talking about are also of prime importance. Perhaps that’s all you see in light of media presentations. Or here on CAF? No one I talk to on the street or parish talks about “modesty”.
I don’t know what you do for ministry, but if you contact your local Catholic Charities you will find the silent work that is going on, that the media conveniently ignores in favor of the controversial political issues.
 
Last edited:
Are you aware that the Catholic Church is the worlds largest non-governmental charitable organization? That charity extends from urban areas to rural areas, in just about any country, in any disaster or famine. The Church is enormously attuned to the needs of the impoverished.

The issues you are talking about are also of prime importance. Perhaps that’s all you see in light of media presentations. Or here on CAF? No one I talk to on the street or parish talks about “modesty”.
I don’t know what you do for ministry, but if you contact your local Catholic Charities you will find the silent work that is going on, that the media conveniently ignores in favor of the controversial political issues.
Nothing you are saying negates my points. I let people know constantly what the Church does charitably. People are shocked it is the largest NGO. I am proud of that. I know what the Church does globally and the amazing work my parish does. Note I referenced a growing contingent of a certain attitude that has a laser focus on said issues while ignoring others, some of the same things lamented by people in the article. Maybe you don’t see it amongst those you encounter, but they do. Also, I volunteer with Catholic Charities, so yes I do know what they do.
 
Last edited:
48.png
VanitasVanitatum:
No, because of work they are having are having time attending and it makes sense for there to be some Masses times that cater to them which is the main point in the article.
Yes, this!

At my daughter’s college (a Catholic college), there was a Mass on Sunday night at 10:00 p.m. It was one of the best -attended Masses on Sunday!

The reason it was well-attended is that many college students were able to attend it–it was convenient.

If they went home for the weekend, they were generally back on campus by 10:00 p.m. And if they didn’t go home for the weekend, they could party on Saturday night, sleep in on Sunday morning–and still attend that late-night Sunday Mass!

And a lot of the public attended this Mass, too–it was do-able for them.

My daughter used to enjoy singing in the choir at that Mass–yes, they had a choir! So it wasn’t just one of those “half-hour Masses” with no music.

I think it makes sense to survey the membership of a parish (easy enough to do in this day of email), and try to figure out times that more people could attend obligation Masses. To me, this shows a caring attitude towards people, not a kow-towing to “lazy” people.

As for weekday Masses–these are not required, and it concerns me that on this thread, they are being spoken of as though everyone should try to make it to daily Masses. When I am off work, I often attend a daily Mass (they’re very short–only about 30 minutes). But unfortunately, my day off is also the time when I book doctor/dentist appts, try to get big cleaning jobs done, plan menus and cook–in other words, I’m not just sitting around watching TV. And even if I were just sitting around watching TV–again, these Masses are not an obligation and no one should be judged for not attending.
Ideally, we should attend daily Mass. But practically, it’s not always going to happen.

My grandmother attended daily Mass. It wasn’t a hardship for her because she was a stay-at-home spouse, and the church was right in the neighborhood.

But when my parish has only one daily Mass and it’s in the morning when I’m traveling to work, that’s a hardship. Same on holy days of obligation when one Mass might be in the morning when I’m traveling to work, one in the middle of the day, and one when I’m traveling home.
 
As for weekday Masses–these are not required, and it concerns me that on this thread, they are being spoken of as though everyone should try to make it to daily Masses. When I am off work, I often attend a daily Mass (they’re very short–only about 30 minutes). But unfortunately, my day off is also the time when I book doctor/dentist appts, try to get big cleaning jobs done, plan menus and cook–in other words, I’m not just sitting around watching TV. And even if I were just sitting around watching TV–again, these Masses are not an obligation and no one should be judged for not attending.
On the subject of daily Mass, it was called to my attention just this week that EWTN has its daily Mass online. That might interest someone who would like to attend daily Mass but can’t be there when it’s offered.
 
48.png
goout:
Are you aware that the Catholic Church is the worlds largest non-governmental charitable organization? That charity extends from urban areas to rural areas, in just about any country, in any disaster or famine. The Church is enormously attuned to the needs of the impoverished.

The issues you are talking about are also of prime importance. Perhaps that’s all you see in light of media presentations. Or here on CAF? No one I talk to on the street or parish talks about “modesty”.
I don’t know what you do for ministry, but if you contact your local Catholic Charities you will find the silent work that is going on, that the media conveniently ignores in favor of the controversial political issues.
Nothing you are saying negates my points. I let people know constantly what the Church does charitably. People are shocked it is the largest NGO. I am proud of that. I know what the Church does globally and the amazing work my parish does. Note I referenced a growing contingent of a certain attitude that has a laser focus on said issues while ignoring others, some of the same things lamented by people in the article. Maybe you don’t see it amongst those you encounter, but they do. Also, I volunteer with Catholic Charities, so yes I do know what they do.
What you are observing is a narrative. Narratives have narrators. That narrative is really distorted because those narrating it have an agenda. There are fringe groups of Catholics on all ends of the spectrum.
 
Maybe I’m throwing gasoline on the fire, but…

We all know we have to follow Jesús to be saved.

Some people simply won’t follow Jesús.

We can try and try to evangelize, to put out resources, to walk alongside, etc (which we should do)

But some people dont want Jesus
 
Last edited:
From the article that doesn’t seem to be the case in the scenario presented.
 
Last edited:
Here’s the thing.
It’s not grave matter to miss Mass when it’s impossible to get there.
We’ve even had posters on this board who can’t get to the scheduled Masses and had a dispensation.
No problem.

I know a devoted, pious Coptic Orthodox woman who works in health care and has to miss Mass every other week.
She would never dream of leaving her religion over Mass times.
Jesus is more important to her than that.

The fact is, a lot of people don’t put Jeus very highly on their list of priorities, and blame it on other things.
 
I think too many churches have become too big. The church I was going to before Covid had 1800 families in it,

If you think about it that is something like 7200 or more people.

except to visit. I havent been to a church with less than 1200 families in decades.

When I was growing up my church had about 100 families. We all knew one another. I went to school with the same kids, we all did the same thing. Are parents worked together.

We were like family in so many ways.

That same church today has over 1,000 families. The town has grown from 2000 people to well over 15,000 to 20,000 people. I could be even larger I havent lived there in years.

There is a lot of reason the church is losing membership as a percentage and what I wrote is one of many reasons. To just state “Catholics are losing touch with the church” is an over simplification of why it is happening.
Here in formerly-dynamic New England, I think that it’s the reverse problem: many parishes have become too small - especially the many remaining legacy former “ethnic parishes” established at the height of immigration. Many of those have been closed, but many remain - I know of two close to me who each number fewer than 200 families, seniors primarily. Such parishes lack the “critical mass” to mount programs, provide ministry outreach, have minuscule religious ed programs for a handful of children, and are often staffed by senior priests as the last step before their retirement. The faithful parishioners hang on as best they can for Mass and the sacraments, but 6 days a week, nothing is going on.
 
Well, I see that we have articles from America magazine (Jesuit run) and National Catholic Reporter, bot of which tend to the seriously liberal end of the spectrum.

It was interesting to see the comment by someone from CARA; CARA’s own statistics show that Mass attendance started to erode after a peak in about 1957 and has been gradually eroding since then.

Several year CARA published a study of Mass attendance broken down by age groups. The largest rate of attendance was the over 50 age group; and with three other groups below that, ended with the lowest rate in the 18 to 29 year-olds with a rate of 18% - as in, 82% of the 18 to 29 year-olds could not be bothered to attend Mass.

Given the liberal bias of America, I see this report as simply one more example of left-leaning. I would suspect that a far more thorough study would show that catechesis or lack thereof, and particularly coupled with what their parents modeled would have a far greater impact on Mass attendance than the hand-selected examples they provided.
 
I think missing Mass so frequently might be discouraging after a long time. At the very least, trying to make more accessible times sounds like it would be worth exploring.
 
Here in formerly-dynamic New England, I think that it’s the reverse problem: many parishes have become too small - especially the many remaining legacy former “ethnic parishes” established at the height of immigration. Many of those have been closed, but many remain - I know of two close to me who each number fewer than 200 families, seniors primarily. Such parishes lack the “critical mass” to mount programs, provide ministry outreach, have minuscule religious ed programs for a handful of children, and are often staffed by senior priests as the last step before their retirement. The faithful parishioners hang on as best they can for Mass and the sacraments, but 6 days a week, nothing is going on.
Are the older folks getting together socially during the week? For coffee or tea? For McDonald’s (at least before COVID)? For a meal and perhaps a card game or a shopping trip (again, before COVID)?

My grandma’s church was a small-town Methodist church, only attended by around 50 people, mainly elderly, on any given Sunday morning. There was a Wed. evening choir practice (and even though my grandma couldn’t sing a note, she was one of the governing officers!)

But other than that choir practice, there weren’t a lot of “church activities” (other than their annual T’sgiving community dinner–YUM!).

However, those people were together almost every day for something–shopping trips were popular, and “tea” at my Grandma’s, and “meet and eat” out to various restaurants, tours of historic places and gardens, and just getting together to enjoy a home-cooked meal and talk for hours.

I would love this! I think that THIS is more like what Christ wants for His Church–people who are in the world but not of the world showing everyone the joy of life in the Lord!, and not just sequestering in the church building at a “study” or “Advent luncheon.”
 
living on SS means that you don’t need a car and gas, work clothing, bag lunches/dinners, really good work shoes, etc.
You don’t need a car? We have had a number of homes, and none of them were within several miles of a supermarket. Or pharmacies or other necessities. (Our first apt. was near things, but we were in a semi-slum and your took your life in your hands to go out.) You need a car, unless you lock yourself away in “assisted living” accommodations.

I don’t think 67 is all that old. I am 74 and I don’t feel that I am too old to work. I do work, mainly for the church (when we can have events), which is all volunteer, and I spend hours on my feet.

The main problem of working when old is that nobody wants to hire you. There is actually quite a lot of anti-old-people sentiment in this country.
 
You don’t need a car? We have had a number of homes, and none of them were within several miles of a supermarket. Or pharmacies or other necessities.
Bus routes. I think it’s awful that people have to take a bus to do grocery shopping, but I have friends that do it all the time, and they think nothing of it. For those with low incomes, the bus passes are free.
 
48.png
Shasta-Rose:
You don’t need a car? We have had a number of homes, and none of them were within several miles of a supermarket. Or pharmacies or other necessities.
Bus routes. I think it’s awful that people have to take a bus to do grocery shopping, but I have friends that do it all the time, and they think nothing of it. For those with low incomes, the bus passes are free.
. . . if there are bus routes where you live.

Out here in the sticks we have minimal bus service, and it’s daytime only.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top