B
Baelor
Guest
What you asked is why husbands have authority. The encyclicals answer this question.There have been one or two quoted here but that is not what I asked pleases. Its okay, thanks
What you asked is why husbands have authority. The encyclicals answer this question.There have been one or two quoted here but that is not what I asked pleases. Its okay, thanks
I don’t think “obey” ever has been in Catholic vows.Hmmmm…strange, I don’t recall the word “obey” in my marriage vows in 1981, I don’t recall that word when my brother and sis in law were married, 10 yrs later. We were married in the Catholic Church too. I guess the reason is, “BECAUSE IT IS NOT USED ANYMORE”. interesting…
Read any of the variety of Papal encyclicals on this topic. Many of them have been linked to and quoted in this thread.
CHARTER OF THE RIGHTS OF THE FAMILY
c) The spouses, in the natural complementarity which exists between man and woman, enjoy the same dignity and equal rights regarding the marriage.
That does not change the fact that the husband is the ruler of the family:
Except for the fact – that both husband and wife have the same dignity and equal rights regarding the marriage.
To say the husband has authority above the wife – would not only do damage to her dignity – but also to her rights.
- With great wisdom Our predecessor Leo XIII, of happy memory, in the Encyclical on Christian marriage which We have already mentioned, speaking of this order to be maintained between man and wife, teaches: “The man is the ruler of the family, and the head of the woman; but because she is flesh of his flesh and bone of his bone, let her be subject and obedient to the man, not as a servant but as a companion, so that nothing be lacking of honor or of dignity in the obedience which she pays. Let divine charity be the constant guide of their mutual relations, both in him who rules and in her who obeys, since each bears the image, the one of Christ, the other of the Church.”[30]
Walking_Home:![]()
That does not change the fact that the husband is the ruler of the family:Except for the fact – that both husband and wife have the same dignity and equal rights regarding the marriage.
To say the husband has authority above the wife – would not only do damage to her dignity – but also to her rights.
I specified the sources I wanted actually.What you asked is why husbands have authority. The encyclicals answer this question.
Exactly. Why tell anyone how to live their marriage. What irks me is this insistence that God has given husbands authority over their wives which would mean that husbands and wives who do not follow that are offending God.I feel like, if being subordinate to your husband makes you happy, go for it. If having a subordinate wife makes you happy, great. Marry a like-minded person and be happy. If having an egalitarian marriage works for you, super. Go with that. At the end of the day, the Church asks us to stay married, open to life, and to help make each other more holy. It does not tell us how we have to do those things. I’d never want to be in the kind of marriage where I have less authority than my husband, or am the “heart” of a head-heart dyad, or where my husband expected submission or obedience. Luckily, I don’t have to be. Whatever works to keep your family together in the long haul is what’s good for 'ya.
That is not a fact. A ruler with real power or as in a constitutional monarchy? If as in in a constitutional monarchy, then just a figurehead and a symbol, if with real power, then marriage is about domination and power.That does not change the fact that the husband is the ruler of the family:
Yes!
There is no “ruler”. As can be seen from the Charter – both husband and wife have the same dignity and equal rights. To say otherwise – would trample the wife.
Maybe in your family the husband rules. But not in mine. Are you saying I’m doing it wrong?That does not change the fact that the husband is the ruler of the family:
Read my quotation – Casti Connubii clearly states that the man is to be a ruler in the way that does not diminish her dignity or equality in the marriage.
Except for the fact – that both husband and wife have the same dignity and equal rights regarding the marriage.
To say the husband has authority above the wife – would not only do damage to her dignity – but also to her rights.
It is a fact if you are Catholic, given that the teaching of the Church, in accordance with that of the Bible, is very clear.That is not a fact.
Neither. A ruler as Christ is the ruler of the Church. Read the encyclical.A ruler with real power or as in a constitutional monarchy?
I am obviously unqualified to comment on the nature of your marriage, so I will not.Maybe in your family the husband rules. But not in mine. Are you saying I’m doing it wrong?
Read my quotation – Casti Connubii clearly states that the man is to be a ruler in the way that does** not diminish her dignity or equality in the marriage**.
Equal does not mean the same.
Those rights and dignity are not jeopardized by the husband’s position as ruler of the family.
And the Charter clearly states-- husband and wife have** the same** dignity and** equal** rights. This leaves no room for a “ruler”.
Walking_Home:![]()
Those rights and dignity are not jeopardized by the husband’s position as ruler of the family.And the Charter clearly states-- husband and wife have the same dignity and equal rights. This leaves no room for a “ruler”.
Would you say that families where the parents “rule” equally are doing something wrong, not adhering to Catholic teaching? Do you leave room for this lifestyle to be a choice, or is it mandatory for Catholics?Those rights and dignity are not jeopardized by the husband’s position as ruler of the family.
That is not the Catholic understanding, as laid out in two Papal encyclicals. As Portrait stated, they were never abrogated or contradicted. I really have nothing else to say, so feel free to reply to this post but unless new information is presented, that will be all from me on this issue.
The “position as ruler” – speaks against the dignity and rights of the wife.
The Catholic teaching is that the husband is the ruler of the family. That is explicit. What is not is what that means.Would you say that families where the parents “rule” equally are doing something wrong, not adhering to Catholic teaching? Do you leave room for this lifestyle to be a choice, or is it mandatory for Catholics?
Excluding priests, no man is acting as if he is Christ. All men and women should try to be Christlike. Obviously JPII did not read it.It is a fact if you are Catholic, given that the teaching of the Church, in accordance with that of the Bible, is very clear.
Neither. A ruler as Christ is the ruler of the Church. Read the encyclical.
I am obviously unqualified to comment on the nature of your marriage, so I will not.