The elusive "I"?

  • Thread starter Thread starter STT
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Please prove your neural impulses can choose what to do and are aware of what they are doing.
There is a purpose that the neural activities exist. What is the purpose of them in your opinion? There couldn’t be there for vain.
Do man-made computers know they exist? If not why not?
I don’t think so. Not all state of matter is liquid, solid, gas, superconductor, conscious, etc. A man-made computer is basically semiconductor which means that it is not a liquid, gas, conductor, etc.
 
There is a purpose that the neural activities exist. What is the purpose of them in your opinion? There couldn’t be there for vain.
I entirely agree - just as there is a reason for our existence. They enable us to express our thoughts, feelings and decisions so that we can communicate, live in harmony and enjoy life.
I don’t think so. Not all state of matter is liquid, solid, gas, superconductor, conscious, etc. A man-made computer is basically semiconductor which means that it is not a liquid, gas, conductor, etc.
There is an immense difference between a person and a machine. We know we exist and to a large extent we can control ourselves and things for better or for worse…
 
Are other people in this world merely different parts of our own personally projected outward?
 
No. I’m actually out here. 👋 Well, in here, I suppose, as far as my perspective is concerned.
That sounds exactly like something I would say…to myself

In all seriousness though, my post was more towards us projecting ourselves onto reality. We are always doing this, no matter how well we know certain individuals
 
How do you** know** the mind is created by matter?
Neurogenesis?

To your later comment “Do man-made computers know they exist? If not why not?” Give more credit to human ingenuity. Computers are only how old? One day they WILL know.
 
I entirely agree - just as there is a reason for our existence. They enable us to express our thoughts, feelings and decisions so that we can communicate, live in harmony and enjoy life.
I was talking about biological process. What is the purpose of them if there is a soul who does all the job.
There is an immense difference between a person and a machine. We know we exist and to a large extent we can control ourselves and things for better or for worse…
Yes, I agree. We however are made of same stuff.
 
That sounds exactly like something I would say…to myself

In all seriousness though, my post was more towards us projecting ourselves onto reality. We are always doing this, no matter how well we know certain individuals
We assume a lots of things my friend.
 
I entirely agree - just as there is a reason for our existence. They enable us to express our thoughts, feelings and decisions so that we can communicate, live in harmony and enjoy life.
No one has stated or implied that the soul “does all the job”.
There is an immense difference between a person and a machine. We know we exist and to a large extent we can control ourselves and things for better or for worse…
There is an immense difference between a person and a machine. We know we exist and to a large extent we can control ourselves and things for better or for worse…
  • Yes, I agree. We however are made of same stuff.
Then why doesn’t a machine have insight, autonomy and responsibility like a person for what it does??
 
. . . In all seriousness though, my post was more towards us projecting ourselves onto reality. We are always doing this, no matter how well we know certain individuals
This conversation, as all others in these forums and elsewhere, demonstrates how far we have to go in trying to know ourselves, let alone others.

Projection may not be the most accurate term. I would see it referring to relationships where we place onto another, aspects of ourselves or of some other person. In a past version of me I recall meeting the sister of an old girlfriend, who had passed away. Dormant feelings all came back and I felt I was in love with her. But she wasn’t her sister and she also did not have those feelings for me. How I felt towards her had much less to do with her, than with the person I had actually loved. I experienced that death again. Things that remain unfinished return to us.

We communicate physically, intellectually, emotionally and spiritually, in the reverse order of their importance, as I see it. It is in the spiritual connection that we come to truly know each other, to go beyond illusion and love another person. It is a joyous journey of discovery, which sin can quickly turn into a dangerous jungle. Even in tears, there is the joy that was love no more in time, but eternal.

Through our relationships we come to know ourselves and ultimately God.
 
By mind you mean intellect?
Yes, if by intellect you mean the following:
Catholic Encylopedia:
The faculty of thought. As understood in Catholic philosophical literature it signifies the higher, spiritual, cognitive power of the soul. It is in this view awakened to action by sense, but transcends the latter in range. Amongst its functions are attention, conception, judgment, reasoning, reflection, and self-consciousness. All these modes of activity exhibit a distinctly suprasensuous element, and reveal a cognitive faculty of a higher order than is required for mere sense-cognitions. In harmony, therefore, with Catholic usage, we reserve the terms intellect, intelligence, and intellectual to this higher power and its operations, although many modern psychologists are wont, with much resulting confusion, to extend the application of these terms so as to include sensuous forms of the cognitive process. By thus restricting the use of these terms, the inaccuracy of such phrases as “animal intelligence” is avoided. Before such language may be legitimately employed, it should be shown that the lower animals are endowed with genuinely rational faculties, fundamentally one in kind with those of man. Catholic philosophers, however they differ on minor points, as a general body have held that intellect is a spiritual faculty depending extrinsically, but not intrinsically, on the bodily organism. The importance of a right theory of intellect is twofold: on account of its bearing on epistemology, or the doctrine of knowledge; and because of its connexion with the question of the spirituality of the soul.
 
The human mind however, is believed to be an output of the human soul.

ICXC NIKA
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top