C
CollegeCatholic
Guest
Ours. In the US we have a whole lot of power for change, what are we doing with it?Whose job is it to restrain capitalism?
Ours. In the US we have a whole lot of power for change, what are we doing with it?Whose job is it to restrain capitalism?
The Culture of Life is indeed, sissy, by common cultural values.Although I haven’t read this thread in its entirety, some of the posters here seem to be preaching a liberal social gospel at the expense of justice. Wars and the death penalty are allowed by the Church (when justified) so get over it, sissies. Or have you forgotten the glorious Crusades and the holy Inquisitions? Lastly, you don’t make the poor rich by making the rich poor. Socialism and communism are evil and Jesus didn’t teach them.![]()
Therese of Liseaux is a fine example of wisdom beyond years. Remind me at what age she died?This whole thread proves there is a difference between knowlege, zeal - and the wisdom to know what to do with them, the latter usually reserved for those who have the blessings of many hard lessoned years and the grace of humility that only the Holy Spirit can bestow.
Christ was not soft on truth, but he was meek and humble of spirit. This is what is lacking in CollegeKid, and he will more than likely be a little less offensive and a little softer in his manner without the compromise of his conscience once the years and the Holy Spirit have had their way. But at least he is not apathetic, and for that we can all be grateful, we need and are getting more Christian youth who want to positively, and with Christian ethics, make a difference in this Post/Christian world we find ourselves in.
For one thing, my name is CollegeCatholic here on the forums and not CollegeKid as your insinuation that my views are liken to a “kid” or “child.” Secondly, as we are called to a child-like faith, perhaps I should actually take this as a compliment. Finally, you seem to have a nice time ignoring the scene in the Temple where Jesus “meek and humble” starts destroying the market place or Jesus’ nice interaction with the Pharisees with such comments as “brood of serpents.” Maybe I should pick it up a little so as to better fullfill my call to be Christ to the world. My terribly offensive posts sure seem to be hitting hard for being simply the ramblings of a child with no respect for his elders.God Bless,
Jeanette L
Yep.College,
My parents just built a vacation home in the mountains. They clearly don’t “need” it and by the parameters you have laid down in this thread their second home constitutes an excess.
Don’t live by American standards. And I’m glad you all had a nice time. My mom owns a very nice house and I go and visit her. Does she need the house? Nope. Do my views on Christian economics change that fact? Nope.My husband, myself and my three children visited their new cabin over Christmas. My husband works very hard and I stay home with our three children. We have one car and do not have very many luxuries. (Though I do constantly remind my children that we have MUCH more than many of those in third world countries). But still, by American standards, we are certainly not wealthy. We would not be able to afford a vacation without my parent’s (relative) wealth. It was a vacation that was good for my family. It was a good respite for my hard working husband. It was a chance for my boys to spend quality time with their grandparents. It was a nice break for me as well. I hope that it is not your position that my family did not “deserve” that positive family experience that my parents’ wealth afforded us.
Why is he working in the houses and not living in them? This same reasoning gives Nike and Walmart their justification for the exploitation of workers for extremely imbalanced profit distribution within the respective companies. I’m glad he is somehow able to manage, even in light of all the factors working against him.While we were at the cabin, there was still some work being finished up. Two carpet layers showed up one afternoon. I will never forget one of them. He was the sweetest young man and we came to find out that he was the single father of a three year old boy. His wife left the man with his son never to be heard from again. My parents’ excessive vacation home was providing that young father with the means to provide for his little boy! The other (much wealthier) cabin owners were also putting this man to work.
Let’s see here, the GDP (Gross Domestic Product) of the USA is $12,370,000,000,000 and we have 290,000,000 people here so that comes out to be about $43,000 per year, per person so that’s about $301,000 for a nice Catholic family of seven… The per year, per person estimate of East Timor (90% Catholic ) is $400 dollars so a nice Catholic family of seven would be $2,800 so the average American individual has spending power about 107 1/2 times that of an East Timorian individual. Now if we all count to 107 on our fingers and toes, realizing that an income is being doubled for every single finger and toe, mabye we can get an idea of the distribution of wealth in the world.What I don’t understand about your position is…where do you think the means to provide for the poor will come from??? Please give me an example of any government, either past or present, that has been able to generate wealth.
Interesting.He certainly was not. Here’s a good article that just came out on that very subject:
sentinel.org/articles/2006-7/14481.html
The Culture of Life is indeed, sissy, by common cultural values. The Culture of Life as the Catholic Church understands it does not exclude the use of the Death Penalty or War.
“What kind of sissy turns the other cheek and brings a message of love, peace, and justice?!”
Again, sometimes War and the Death Penalty are signs of love, they definitely bring about justice, and they can restore peace.
Let’s not be so quick to label the Crusades as being “glorious.” What exactly did they accomplish? We lost Alexandria, Antioch, Constantinople, the Holy Land, and a whole lot of innocent lives… hmmm…
Whether they succeeded or failed, they were noble nonetheless. There is not a more chivalrous thing one can do than defend his Christian brother from the oppression of heathens.
You’re right about your rich/poor comment, you make the rich “rich” by convicting them of the needs of the poor so that everyone has their basic needs met. Once that happens, where the remaining wealth should go is an interesting debate but one that I am not involved in. If we make Bill Gates “poor” by convicting him of the needs of the poor and have him give away $45,000,000,000 he would still have around $3,000,000,000 left. Poor guy.
Many of our social programs in this country are socialistic and much of Jesus’ message is actually very socialistic… He definately wasn’t preaching capitalism so what exactly is your argument? The Church has always condemned socialism and Communism…as well as capitalism when it is in its purest form. However, social programs like welfare and the like are not based on Christian principles. They are examples of the Government stealing our hard-earned money for inefficient programs that just give people more money to buy drugs with. So, where’s the Christian charity? There is none. It is the responsibility of individual Christians to feed the hungry, clothe the naked, visit the imprisoned, etc. NOT the Feds. Mother Teresa did much more than the Indian govn’t ever could. Plus, in Thessalonians somewhere it says that if you do not work, you should not eat.![]()
**In extremely rare situations… the vast majority of the time they are unjust. What are you to say about that vast majority of injustice when it comes to War and Capital Punishment?Again, sometimes War and the Death Penalty are signs of love, they definitely bring about justice, and they can restore peace.
**Whether they succeeded or failed, they were noble nonetheless. There is not a more chivalrous thing one can do than defend his Christian brother from the oppression of heathens.
hard-earned money for inefficient programs that just give people more money to buy drugs with. So, where’s the Christian charity? There is none. It is the responsibility of individual Christians to feed the hungry, clothe the naked, visit the imprisoned, etc. NOT the Feds.The Church has always condemned socialism and Communism…as well as capitalism when it is in its purest form. However, social programs like welfare and the like are not based on Christian principles. They are examples of the Government stealing our
**Plus, in Thessalonians somewhere it says that if you do not work, you should not eat.
Are you serious? Don’t you think you are being a bit hypocritical? YOU live by American standards! What gives you the moral right to be using the computer and the internet that is the fruit of our evil capitalistic society?Don’t live by American standards
Did you ever look at the website I asked you to look at, www.acton.org? I’d say that website represents “christian economics” better than what you’re trying to sell. Have you ever read The Road to Serfdom by Hayek?And I’m glad you all had a nice time. My mom owns a very nice house and I go and visit her. Does she need the house? Nope. Do my views on Christian economics change that fact? Nope.
OK, sorry, but I have to insert another ARE YOU SERIOUS??? First of all, are you truly insinuating that my parents are exploiting this young man by paying him to lay their carpet? Would he be less exploited if he wasn’t working and was on welfare? What about the dignity of work? That is a very Catholic concept. As to why he isn’t living in one of the houses… perhaps he will one day after thirty years of hard work. If it is demeaning to work on the houses and dignity is only found by everyone being able to live in the same kind of house, then how will any of the houses get built?Why is he working in the houses and not living in them? This same reasoning gives Nike and Walmart their justification for the exploitation of workers for extremely imbalanced profit distribution within the respective companies. I’m glad he is somehow able to manage, even in light of all the factors working against him.
Let’s see here, the GDP (Gross Domestic Product) of the USA is $12,370,000,000,000 and we have 290,000,000 people here so that comes out to be about $43,000 per year, per person so that’s about $301,000 for a nice Catholic family of seven… The per year, per person estimate of East Timor (90% Catholic ) is $400 dollars so a nice Catholic family of seven would be $2,800 so the average American individual has spending power about 107 1/2 times that of an East Timorian individual. Now if we all count to 107 on our fingers and toes, realizing that an income is being doubled for every single finger and toe, mabye we can get an idea of the distribution of wealth in the world.
Uh, no. I asked you to give me an example, either current or historic, of a government generating wealth. The PEOPLE of the United States generated our wealth, not our government. Most third world countries could generate wealth governments would stop meddling with crippling policies and if corrupt governments were thrown out of power.Does that answer your question?
Oh, no, he’s admitted he’s a flaming liberal! Have fun trying to infect me with your disease, but it’s not happening.A fellow college student I see. You are the type of mind I hope to one day “poison” on our college campuses.![]()
:bounce:Wow, this is the kind of stuff that I enjoy hearing because it is at the heart of what I’m talking about.
There will be injustice in all aspects of society, but that doesn’t mean that we should abolish it altogether. The judicial system is not always just, but that doesn’t mean that we should just eliminate it. Likewise with war and the DP.In extremely rare situations… the vast majority of the time they are unjust. What are you to say about that vast majority of injustice when it comes to War and Capital Punishment?
I’m not interested in becoming a pagan. Also, note that I said “defend” and not “terrorize.” Remarkably, I got such an idea from the Roman Pontiff. “How does a man love according to divine precept his neighbor as himself when, knowing that his Christian brothers in faith and in name are held by the perfidious Muslims in strict confinement and weighed down by the yoke of heaviest servitude, he does not devote himself to the task of freeing them? …Is it by chance that you do not know that many thousands of Christians are bound in slavery and imprisoned by the Muslims, tortured with innumerable torments?”The fundamental moslems in the “Other Religions” section of the sight could possibly fall head over heals in love with you. Watch out because you are a perfect candidate for conversion.
:whacky: You say that “many of them [politicians] lack proper guidance and their hearts are too hardened to the Truth of the Gospel” but yet you want them to be the ones to “regulate through authority things such as economics”?! :whacky: The less power the govn’t has, the better. The Church teaches that what can be done at the lowest level should be done at the lowest level. Individuals and familes come before the state and federal governments when it comes to society’s welfare.Considering the fact that we put the “Feds” in office, we vote on the laws, we install the president who in tern assigns Supreme Court Justices… Also, the law is necessary for countering injustice because people are going to be sinful. Many of them lack proper guidance are their hearts are too hardened to be open to the Truth of the Gospel and as such, it is necessary to regulate through authority things such as economics. I can’t do anything about a guy that has slaves because I am nonviolent and don’t have authority to jail this person and free the slaves but the “Feds” sure can.
I highly doubt the first thing you said, although if it’s true, I can do nothing but agree with you that there’s nothing just about that. I’d like to see statistics and a reliable source to back it up though. As for the handicapped or incompetent, of course they’re the exceptions. They are, in your words, “extremely rare situations.” Of course we need to take care of the people that can’t take care of themselves. And as for Mother Teresa, the people she cared for may not have even been able to work. However, in a country like America, no one has that excuse. She took care of them out of love for Christ despite the fact that they didn’t necessarily deserve it.It’s interesting that the poor of the world work more jobs for more hours and for the least money… Also, what do you do about mentally and physically handicapped people, injured people, uneducated people, abused people, etc… ?? Why was Mother Teresa feeding nonworking individuals?
Actually, I was thinking the same about the things you’ve had to say. Maybe you’re not following THE Gospel, but rather YOURS. But I’m sure you’d say the same about me.I can’t believe that I’m the only one that doesn’t see through the distorted nature of these arguments and how out of line they are with the Gospel message…
Have you ever heard of subsidiarity?Also, the law is necessary for countering injustice because people are going to be sinful. Many of them lack proper guidance are their hearts are too hardened to be open to the Truth of the Gospel and as such, it is necessary to regulate through authority things such as economics. I can’t do anything about a guy that has slaves because I am nonviolent and don’t have authority to jail this person and free the slaves but the “Feds” sure can.
When using common, contemporary labels and when referring to my views on economics, “flaming liberal” might not be too far off the mark. Almost every other area of myself would be considered “close-minded” so I don’t really have friends in either camp. For some reason, I don’t get along with hardline Democrats or Republicans and I’m glad. Personally, I vote Catholic. As far as the disease goes, radical Christian charity doesn’t seem to be very contagious so don’t worry too much.Oh, no, he’s admitted he’s a flaming liberal! Have fun trying to infect me with your disease, but it’s not happening.![]()
Society should be moulded to end injustice, not perpetuate it. This should be spearheaded by the followers of Christ, especially those who have been given the wholeness of Truth. (Catholics)There will be injustice in all aspects of society, but that doesn’t mean that we should abolish it altogether. The judicial system is not always just, but that doesn’t mean that we should just eliminate it. Likewise with war and the DP.
Many of the people killed by the Crusaders were Christians who spoke a different language. Way to go, guys.I’m not interested in becoming a pagan. Also, note that I said “defend” and not “terrorize.” Remarkably, I got such an idea from the Roman Pontiff. “How does a man love according to divine precept his neighbor as himself when, knowing that his Christian brothers in faith and in name are held by the perfidious Muslims in strict confinement and weighed down by the yoke of heaviest servitude, he does not devote himself to the task of freeing them? …Is it by chance that you do not know that many thousands of Christians are bound in slavery and imprisoned by the Muslims, tortured with innumerable torments?”
-Pope Innocent III to the Crusaders
Actually, I said “many of them [people] lack proper guidance and their hearts are too hardened to the Truth of the Gospel” so although it makes a compelling argument trying to defend statements I never made, it’s a little silly. We vote in candidates who have proven that they will genuinely stand for life from conception to natural death, yes this includes all the people between those stages as well.:whacky:You say that “many of them [politicians] lack proper guidance and their hearts are too hardened to the Truth of the Gospel” but yet you want them to be the ones to “regulate through authority things such as economics”?! :whacky: The less power the govn’t has, the better. The Church teaches that what can be done at the lowest level should be done at the lowest level. Individuals and familes come before the state and federal governments when it comes to society’s welfare.
“More than two-thirds of all poor families with children included one or more individuals who worked in 2003. What’s more, family members in working-poor families with children typically worked combined totals of 46 weeks per year.”I highly doubt the first thing you said, although if it’s true, I can do nothing but agree with you that there’s nothing just about that. I’d like to see statistics and a reliable source to back it up though. As for the handicapped or incompetent, of course they’re the exceptions. They are, in your words, “extremely rare situations.” Of course we need to take care of the people that can’t take care of themselves. And as for Mother Teresa, the people she cared for may not have even been able to work. However, in a country like America, no one has that excuse. She took care of them out of love for Christ despite the fact that they didn’t necessarily deserve it.
Luke 4: 18-19Actually, I was thinking the same about the things you’ve had to say. Maybe you’re not following THE Gospel, but rather YOURS. But I’m sure you’d say the same about me.![]()
[sarcasm]Sorry for getting online, I’ll be sure to drive over next time. [/sarcasm]Are you serious? Don’t you think you are being a bit hypocritical? YOU live by American standards! What gives you the moral right to be using the computer and the internet that is the fruit of our evil capitalistic society?
Did you ever look at the website I asked you to look at, www.acton.org? I’d say that website represents “christian economics” better than what you’re trying to sell. Have you ever read The Road to Serfdom by Hayek?
This young man was acting as my poster child. I can’t actually speak to his or your parents particular situations. I was mainly focusing on your reasoning that this extra house was providing work for him.OK, sorry, but I have to insert another ARE YOU SERIOUS??? First of all, are you truly insinuating that my parents are exploiting this young man by paying him to lay their carpet? Would he be less exploited if he wasn’t working and was on welfare? What about the dignity of work? That is a very Catholic concept. As to why he isn’t living in one of the houses… perhaps he will one day after thirty years of hard work. If it is demeaning to work on the houses and dignity is only found by everyone being able to live in the same kind of house, then how will any of the houses get built?
Tax money isn’t generating wealth?? International trade and multinational loans aren’t generating wealth?? Interesting… How does a country with extremely limited natural resources or skilled labor generate wealth?Uh, no. I asked you to give me an example, either current or historic, of a government generating wealth. The PEOPLE of the United States generated our wealth, not our government. Most third world countries could generate wealth governments would stop meddling with crippling policies and if corrupt governments were thrown out of power.
Maybe I’m not speaking at the educational level that I assumed you were at but you obviously have very little understanding of economics. If you don’t “bring down the rich” in order to “elevate the poor” you get a phenomenon known as inflation where the poor are still poor, even though they have more money. If it was as easy as creating artificial capital then poverty would be much simpler. One of the key factors in solving poverty is distribution of wealth. This idea recognizes the finite pool of wealth that is available and makes apparent that most of the world’s wealth is concentrated in a certain small percentage of the population. There are 8.2 million U.S. households with a net worth of more than $1 million and yet 1 for every 7 Americans is below the poverty line.Again, I ask you… Why do we have to work to bring down the rich? Why can’t we seek to elevate the poor?
I’ll have to look those over, thanks.CollegeCatholic,
Read over these links, they are on Distributism.
distributism.com/
theuniversityconcourse.com/V,5,1-28-2000/Storck.htm
justpeace.org/distribute.htm
distributism.org/
Neither socialism, nor capitalism is the answer.
My Tansliteration:Have you ever heard of subsidiarity?
acton.org/publicat/randl/article.php?id=200
CollegeCatholic said:(Is your name in reference to the tragic character of old German lore?)
Actually if you got off your high horse at looked at the real world you would see that Government is a very bad provider of services and that the poor are often those who suffer most. Small groups can go among the poor and provide medical care. Medecin Sans Frontieres provides more medical aid to Africans than all the intergovernmental programs put together. Also you seem to have bought the myth that there is a finite amount of wealth in the world so if I have more you must have less. What makes capitalism different from socialism is that it recognises that wealth can grow. In other words the sum total of the wealth in the world in 2000 was greater than the sum total of wealth in the world in 1900. The “poor” in western countries are better off than some of the “not poor” in third world countries. here in Australia every adult is guaranteed a minimum of $12,000 per annum in direct grants and up to $10,000 in indirect grants (subsidised health care etc). That would be considered well off in most Third World countries. Australia can afford it because we are wealthy as a country because we have exploited our resources both natural and human. Africa has received trillions of dollars in direct and indirect aid from both Governments and NGO’s yet it is poorer than it was at independance. If the solution was just providing the means then Africa should be sitting pretty today. Instead it is going backwards with all economic and socila indicators showing a steadt decline over the last 50 years. So I suggest you do a little research before mouthing slogans and accusing others of not doing enough. BTW who is paying for your college degree? And do you consider it a luxury or a necessity? After all, the cost of your degree would probably give pay for a school and primary education for an entire village. Whose need is greater?Interesting… What small groups have the means to give families without medical insurance the means for their children to go to the hospital? I see all sorts of small groups working but there isn’t mass support for these groups. In other words, the way things are is just right?
Um, no, they’re not “conservative”, they are libertarian.Now I’m being told to not look to the Bishopric but look to some conservative economists with no real answer?
Well, you really ought to. Do you know who Freidrich Hayek is? He was a nobel prize winning economist. You are certainly free to your opinions on economics, but if you want to be able to persuasively defend them, you should should read plenty of material from the opposite viewpoint. You need to always leave the door at least slightly open to the fact that you could be wrong. That is called humility.No, I’ve never read The Road to Serfdom by Hayek.
You are not only insulting, you are wrong. I have a degree in economics. Haven’t you learned the difference between wealth and money, yet? Taxation is taking a portion of the wealth that has already been generated. Taxation isn’t the creation of wealth. That is pretty elementary economics.Tax money isn’t generating wealth?? International trade and multinational loans aren’t generating wealth?? Interesting… How does a country with extremely limited natural resources or skilled labor generate wealth? Maybe I’m not speaking at the educational level that I assumed you were at