The Fear of Hell

  • Thread starter Thread starter Charlemagne_III
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Are you suggesting
  • you believe yourself to be sinless?
  • that Charlie forgot about Mary?
  • that some of us are not wicked?
Mankind has fallen by its own choice,
Sin is within us all.
Death is the consequence of sin.
Jesus is the cure.

. . . or is it the hiding (shame), the running away part?
We do run to sin; that’s the problem - it is in our nature.

Everything you have ever done will be known to all at the end of time. How does that feel?
I don’t know about the “end of time” since I don’t know if time will end but at some time, ALL will know what Jesus did for ALL, do you think that what was done for ALL will be meaningful, in a good way, for ALL and how do you feel about that?
 
Wouldn’t someone need to subscribe to the concept of “sin” to see themselves is sinful, sinless, or anywhere inbetween?
We have appropriated what belongs to God to our detriment. Reality belongs to God as its Creator and the ultimate Truth.

We have the capacity to think and discern what is. Holding ourselves to be the arbiters of truth we give ourselves permission to distort any idea to our liking. Sin then can become merely a concept, a subjective “truth” easily denied.

Some don’t subscribe, and go further, unabashedly parading their shame, proclaiming and engaging others in declaring it to be goodness. People are lost; some it seems, don’t feel lost because they have no actual home.
 
. . . how do you feel about that?
If I have understood you correctly, there is no point our discussing these matters. My mind is closed to anything that is not accepted by the Church. And, your mind is closed to anything that does not fit your interpretation of scripture. 🤷
 
Wouldn’t someone need to subscribe to the concept of “sin” to see themselves is sinful, sinless, or anywhere inbetween?
Do you mean sin in the theological sense rather than in the practical sense?

Very likely. But some people see themselves as sinless because they deny they do wrong.

This too is a sin because it is a lie. Lying to oneself is a sin, as much as lying to others.

You don’t have to subscribe to Christian morality to know you have sinned.

Nor to know that you owe somebody an apology.
 
Are you suggesting
  • you believe yourself to be sinless?
Interesting that this is your reply.
  • that Charlie forgot about Mary?
Charlie who, Mary who?
Mankind has fallen by its own choice,
If you mean the Original Sin, the Fall, then what you’re saying is Mormon or some Hindu doctrine, but to the best of my knowledge, not Catholic doctrine.
And even if you mean ordinary sin, given the Catholic distinction between venial and mortal sin, what you’re saying isn’t Catholic.
We do run to sin; that’s the problem - it is in our nature.
If it’s in our nature, then it’s not our fault; we cannot be blamed for something that is in our nature.
Everything you have ever done will be known to all at the end of time. How does that feel?
I should just take your word that it will be so?
And the fact that I asked the above question, do you see that as proof that I actually believe you, but pretend not to?
We have appropriated what belongs to God to our detriment. Reality belongs to God as its Creator and the ultimate Truth.

We have the capacity to think and discern what is. Holding ourselves to be the arbiters of truth we give ourselves permission to distort any idea to our liking. Sin then can become merely a concept, a subjective “truth” easily denied.

Some don’t subscribe, and go further, unabashedly parading their shame, proclaiming and engaging others in declaring it to be goodness. People are lost; some it seems, don’t feel lost because they have no actual home.
This is just your projection. And I dare say a malevolent one.
I don’t understand what people get from saying things like you say here.
Some kind of self-flagellation and other-flagellation ego trip or something.
 
Do you mean sin in the theological sense rather than in the practical sense?
Even the theological senses differ For some its a state of separation from God. For some it is the violation of a divine law. In either case they seem to be dependent on someone having certain religious stances.
Very likely. But some people see themselves as sinless because they deny they do wrong.

This too is a sin because it is a lie. Lying to oneself is a sin, as much as lying to others.
Some see this as situational and that by itself lying and deception can be justifiable (classic example: Are there any Jews in your attic).
You don’t have to subscribe to Christian morality to know you have sinned.

Nor to know that you owe somebody an apology.
You may have to subscribe to religious concepts to see actions as a “sin.” A more inclusive question nigh be “have you ever committed a moral infraction.” Though in either case the actions some one sees as “wrong” may differ from yours. Ex: You may see masturbation as a “sin” while another as an innocuous activity.
 
God plays hide and seek??

Then your standards for what counts as “belief in God” are trivial.

I really don’t buy the usual Satan doctrine.
I think Satan is God’s servant, per God’s command, and he has the unfortunate and thankless task to show people the extent of their own willingness to go against God.

That’s just crazy, or a cheap excuse. One cannot simply believe “whatever one wants.”

I think that is quite a schizophrenic way to see things. Blaming things on Satan is a convenient excuse for not looking at one’s own willingness to sin.
You can call them trivial if you choose, but its opinion.

I don’t see how Satan can be a servant of God, does not ones servant serve ones master?

Do you believe in God? I am thinking you must because you believe in Satan. But who says one cannot believe whatever one wants? People can convince themselves of anything, it happens everyday.

Where did I ever blame the devil for my sin? I don’t think anyone ever said that. Just because he tempts people to sin, in no way makes the blame his. Adam and Eve tried that, to blame the devil that is. God did not fall for it either.
 
Wouldn’t someone need to subscribe to the concept of “sin” to see themselves is sinful, sinless, or anywhere inbetween?
No. Even a child knows right from wrong. If a child steals candy from the store and knows he should pay for it, that is wrong and that is sin. All sin is knowing right from wrong. Surely you can subscribe to the concept of right from wrong, can you not?
 
Since you decided to quote the Apostles’ Creed on hell and said you had no problem reciting it before…

PART ONE
THE PROFESSION OF FAITH

SECTION TWO
THE PROFESSION OF THE CHRISTIAN FAITH

THE CREDO

The Apostles Creed

…]He descended into hell.

Source: vatican.va/archive/ccc_css/archive/catechism/credo.htm
Then the CCC is inconsistent, since in the section below it reads as I gave it:

*ART ONE: THE PROFESSION OF FAITH
Code:
SECTION ONE "I BELIEVE" - "WE BELIEVE"
    CHAPTER THREE MAN'S RESPONSE TO GOD
        Article 2 WE BELIEVE
            The Credo
The Apostles Creed

…]He descended to the dead.

Source: vatican.va/archive/ENG0015/__P13.HTM*

btw, I’ve not yet said whether or not I believe in hell as I’m taunting Charles. 😃
 
I don’t see how Satan can be a servant of God, does not ones servant serve ones master?
Of course. And some servants have to do some pretty dirty work.
Do you believe in God? I am thinking you must because you believe in Satan.
I never said I “believe in Satan.”
I’m not sure what you understand by “belief in God”, so I’m not sure how to answer your question.
But who says one cannot believe whatever one wants? People can convince themselves of anything, it happens everyday.
Then they’re all crazy …

Wllliam James wrote “The Will to Believe”. In my opinion, a very relevant essay on the matter. He makes a good case for how come a person cannot believe just anything.
Where did I ever blame the devil for my sin? I don’t think anyone ever said that.
It’s not that uncommon for Christians to blame Satan. “Satan made me do it”, “It was Satan’s work.”
Just because he tempts people to sin, in no way makes the blame his.
Exactly.
Adam and Eve tried that, to blame the devil that is. God did not fall for it either.
Telling, isn’t it?
Yes Really. Why do you sound surprised?
I started a thread on this. in the meantime I really don’t understand some things about Catholics.
 
Of course. And some servants have to do some pretty dirty work.

I never said I “believe in Satan.”
I’m not sure what you understand by “belief in God”, so I’m not sure how to answer your question.

Then they’re all crazy …

Wllliam James wrote “The Will to Believe”. In my opinion, a very relevant essay on the matter. He makes a good case for how come a person cannot believe just anything.

It’s not that uncommon for Christians to blame Satan. “Satan made me do it”, “It was Satan’s work.”

Exactly.

Telling, isn’t it?

I started a thread on this. in the meantime I really don’t understand some things about Catholics.
Really? Only Catholic’s? Why just Catholic’s.

I will make my question easier, (I really thought it was easy to begin with:D but here it is). Do you believe in the existence of God? Better?😉
 
At this point, I tend to think that the doctrine of heaven and hell has primarily didactic purposes and applications, but that it isn’t about ontological realities that one could readily understand.
It could be argued (so I will) that anyone who is driven to do good deeds through fear of hell or a desire to get into heaven is acting out of cowardice or selfishness, and against the spirit of love in 1 Cor 13: “If I give all I possess to the poor and give over my body to hardship that I may boast, but do not have love, I gain nothing. Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs.”
 
Really? Only Catholic’s? Why just Catholic’s.
Not just Catholics; but specifically Catholics because I grew up among them (while not one of them), so they are sort of my reference group.
I will make my question easier, (I really thought it was easy to begin with:D but here it is). Do you believe in the existence of God? Better?
God’s existence is not a matter to belief, cannot be a matter of belief. If God is defined as the Being Who Precedes and Contextualizes All Other Beings, the God is beyond all issues of belief.

God’s properties, however, are to some extent a matter of belief; that is, there are some properties that are traditionally ascribed to God which may be such that they need to be taken on faith.

When people question the “existence of God,” they usually question whether some of the properties traditionally ascribed to God make for a coherent unit.
 
It could be argued (so I will) that anyone who is driven to do good deeds through fear of hell or a desire to get into heaven is acting out of cowardice or selfishness, and against the spirit of love in 1 Cor 13: “If I give all I possess to the poor and give over my body to hardship that I may boast, but do not have love, I gain nothing. Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It does not dishonor others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs.”
As far as I understood, this is the Catholic view. Maybe someone more knowledgeable can provide a reference to the CCC.

Reading again what I said earlier -
At this point, I tend to think that the doctrine of heaven and hell has primarily didactic purposes and applications, but that it isn’t about ontological realities that one could readily understand.
This could indeed be taken to mean that the doctrine of heaven and hell is a kind of reward-and-punishment didactic strategy.

And on a very base level, it is; some people just don’t understand anything more refined, and cannot be moved to good action in any other way but through promise of rewards and punishments.

Someone with a bit more sensibility can understand that doctrine in some other way. For example, thinking about it, they could get the insight that you describe above.
 
Not just Catholics; but specifically Catholics because I grew up among them (while not one of them), so they are sort of my reference group.

God’s existence is not a matter to belief, cannot be a matter of belief. If God is defined as the Being Who Precedes and Contextualizes All Other Beings, the God is beyond all issues of belief.

God’s properties, however, are to some extent a matter of belief; that is, there are some properties that are traditionally ascribed to God which may be such that they need to be taken on faith.

When people question the “existence of God,” they usually question whether some of the properties traditionally ascribed to God make for a coherent unit.
How about you? Do you believe I the being who precedes…?
 
As far as I understood, this is the Catholic view. Maybe someone more knowledgeable can provide a reference to the CCC.

Reading again what I said earlier -

This could indeed be taken to mean that the doctrine of heaven and hell is a kind of reward-and-punishment didactic strategy.

And on a very base level, it is; some people just don’t understand anything more refined, and cannot be moved to good action in any other way but through promise of rewards and punishments.

Someone with a bit more sensibility can understand that doctrine in some other way. For example, thinking about it, they could get the insight that you describe above.
You are correct, If you follow God and his commands you will be rewarded with his presence in heaven.

See we don’t want material things, that is not what God is, We want what money cannot buy! The gift of being with God forever and seeing him face to face.

Actually before you can go to heaven you must let go of everything in this world, and your desire for it.

Heaven is just God, being with him in paradise and having everlasting and peace forever and ever.
 
. . . This is just your projection. And I dare say a malevolent one.
I don’t understand what people get from saying things like you say here.
Some kind of self-flagellation and other-flagellation ego trip or something.
I am not the one projecting.

It isn’t so much a matter of getting anything other than sharing ideas about what it means to be human and our struggles with what life brings, some from our own hands.

Besides that, what I would hope to get out of this is for people to think.

I can safely say, you have no idea about the Beauty and the Wonder.
This world is so very miserable in comparison to what awaits and actually can be glimpsed right here, right now.

Perhaps a take-home message is that people settle for trash in their search for pleasure, wealth, power and honour.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top