M
mathonihah
Guest
Already answered twice, and he didn’t take any notice. What guarantee do I have that it I answer it again (which I now have), he will?And what? You cannot answer it now?
Already answered twice, and he didn’t take any notice. What guarantee do I have that it I answer it again (which I now have), he will?And what? You cannot answer it now?
Try this link.So if the bible has hundreds of contradictions in it why did your prophet (smith) use the KJB and why is it still being used by you mormons today? Please show proof of your claims Math or quit making yourself look foolish with such obsurd claims.
Mormons and atheists see Bible contradictions the same way. Both don’t stop to wonder how it is the contradictions are there, as though they think the people who compiled both the OT and NT didn’t notice them. Don’t they think they should have been removed long, long, long ago? The question they never ask, or seek to understand, is why?So if the bible has hundreds of contradictions in it why did your prophet (smith) use the KJB and why is it still being used by you mormons today? Please show proof of your claims Math or quit making yourself look foolish with such obsurd claims.
Why don’t you actually point something out instead of being lazy and showing google search results.
Obvious, there is no desire to dialogue. Here to bear his testimony is my guess.Why don’t you actually point something out instead of being lazy and showing google search results.
How lazy can you be?![]()
He is in way over his head, and has been for quite some time.Obvious, there is no desire to dialogue. Here to bear his testimony is my guess.
Because I don’t consider them important, any more than I consider your claim of “contradictions” in the First Vision to be important. They both fall in the same category.Why don’t you actually point something out instead of being lazy and showing google search results.
How lazy can you be?![]()
Too funny. :clapping:Because I don’t consider them important, any more than I consider your claim of “contradictions” in the First Vision to be important. They both fall in the same category.
So, again, you are making assertions you cannot back up.Because I don’t consider them important, any more than I consider your claim of “contradictions” in the First Vision to be important. They both fall in the same category.
ok…looked at the first link. I saw no contradictions. I DID find it humorous that you relied on a Muslim site and an Atheist site. That gives us a clue on how you really believe.
only to the lazy and unlearned…Because I don’t consider them important, any more than I consider your claim of “contradictions” in the First Vision to be important. They both fall in the same category.
But seriously, you should find them important enough to understand why they are there. If not, when your Mormon house of cards falls, you’ll be making the same arguments but without your “I Believe” mantra intact. It pains me to see so many former LDS go atheist.Because I don’t consider them important, any more than I consider your claim of “contradictions” in the First Vision to be important. They both fall in the same category.
Good, I am glad you found my post amusing. That was the least I could do.Too funny. :clapping:
Mathonihah:
So the Jews were eating symbols and not actual tangible foods (Sacrificed lamb, wine, bitter herbs,etc)? Ah no! You are dead wrong! So if I consume symbols of carrots my eye site will improve by eating mere symbols?Those foods were also symbolic of the spiritual feeding made possible by, or in anticipation of, the Atonement. They were still eating and drinking symbols, just as we are eating and drinking symbols when we eat and drink the bread and wine.
Dead wrong! They were eating real lamb, real wine, real herbs etc.; but the real lamb, the real wine, the real herbs etc. were symbolic of the the sacrificial offering of Christ—in the same way that the real bread and real wine of the Eucharist are symbolic of the sacrificial offering of Christ.So the Jews were eating symbols and not actual tangible foods (Sacrificed lamb, wine, bitter herbs,etc)? Ah no! You are dead wrong! So if I consume symbols of carrots my eye site will improve by eating mere symbols?
Why would God tell the Jews to consume a tangible sacrificed lamb and yet send His Son the Lamb of God, who was sacrificed at Calvary (Flesh,Blood,Soul,Divinity) and teach His Son to the disciples He is merely a symbolic Lamb? The perfect Lamb who fulfilled the Seder/Passover Lamb? Now where do you get such absurd ideas and beliefs? Mormonism is clueless about the Seder Meal.
Frankly, your posts are so nonsensical that they are not worth replying to, so do me a favor and spare me the trouble.BTW: Was Jesus death on the cross symbolic or literal ?
ok…looked at the first link. I saw no contradictions. I DID find it humorous that you relied on a Muslim site and an Atheist site. That gives us a clue on how you really believe.Good, I am glad you found my post amusing. That was the least I could do.
BTW, do us a favor and tell pablope that his question has been answered again for the THIRD time. Hope that is going to be enough. LOL!
Math -Dead wrong! They were eating real lamb, real wine, real herbs etc.; but the real lamb, the real wine, the real herbs etc. were symbolic of the the sacrificial offering of Christ—in the same way that the real bread and real wine of the Eucharist are symbolic of the sacrificial offering of Christ…
Hmm…so you believe as the atheists do? as the Muslims do?
Huh…Good, I am glad you found my post amusing. That was the least I could do.
BTW, do us a favor and tell pablope that his question has been answered again for the THIRD time. Hope that is going to be enough. LOL!