M
Maximian
Guest
That’s a very specific order! Can I suggest you look the Great Reset up for yourself?
Last edited:
I would concur that that is true.Maybe we are in different alternate realities…
I like hearing peoples views on it, rather then reading endless links that may not be their viewsThat’s a very specific order! Can I suggest you look the Great Reset up dor yourself?
Depends on if it factually true or not.It most certainly is. Would you consider it uncharitable if I said you had no work ethic?
So a bunch of evil, greedy, exploitative capitalists get together from time to time to relax and drink $70K/bottle scotch and eat Strottarga Bianco Caviar and plot chat.Can you please explain what this is all about and its errors, who exactly is propagating it.
You went on a virtue signalling rant and derailed the point. I’ll repost what I said before you went on a tear:goout:
It most certainly is. Would you consider it uncharitable if I said you had no work ethic?It’s not an uncharitable assumption that the work ethic is disappearing and that it contributes to the cycle of poverty.
For the third time, that is faulty logic. Un-fillable jobs in one place does not prove that people in another place can fill those jobs.It’s the direct statistical evidence, shown by un-fillable jobs
This is the reality that employers live with.To my knowledge there are plenty of jobs for everyone who really wants one. Go to any employment or staffing agency and ask them. The issue is the willingness to work and stay with a job more than a day or two. The rise of staffing agencies is due to the loss of the work ethic. Employers do not want the hassle of the employee revolving door.
Less imperious? Are you saying my request to hear in your own words the issue and its pros and cons is arrogant and domineering?Then you could try to find a less imperious way of making your request. But I do think that people who want to engage in a discussion can reasonably be expected to do their own homework.
homework
Give you think I am being ’ imperious’ I am sorry if you have been offended in any way by the attitude you think I am taking, and will withdraw the question for risk of more misunderstanding on why I requested this from your pov rather then a link.I like hearing peoples views on it, rather then reading endless links that may not be their views
Do you see this as an opportunistic attempt to use COVID19 as an excuse to impose socialism?
Thank you Annie for your POV.So a bunch of evil, greedy, exploitative capitalists get together from time to time to relax and drink $70K/bottle scotch and eat Strottarga Bianco Caviar and plot chat.
They have decided that since the world is upended and people are feeling disoriented, now would be the time to totally impose their wishlist own best ideas for social, political, cultural, and economic changes on the entire world.
Another bunch of people, who have up til now been fighting against the capitalists because of their evil, greedy, exploitative ways, have decided that the desire of the capitalists to appease us all with care-free lives is a sign that they have grown a conscience.
Some of us don’t really want to have every aspect of our lives regulated by evil rich people and are disagreeing.
well, I didn’t write it because you asked, but I was happy you asked so I could write itThank you Annie for your POV.
Unless you personally know the individual people and know for a fact that they are lazy, it is certainly uncharitable speculation to call them lazy. I thought this sort of thinking died out with eugenics, but here it is again!LeafByNiggle:
Depends on if it factually true or not.It most certainly is. Would you consider it uncharitable if I said you had no work ethic?
I can never learn anothers pov unless I ask. Sure I can read a myriad of websites on the great reset. Unless they are academic, they are going to be biased towards the authors view. Thats fine if I want the authors pov, it wont illuminate me on the original poster pov or anothers pov who cares to post.I agree with @Maximium that when you read a thread about a public issue you shouldn’t ask the posters to explain the issue itself to you. Learning about things on your own is a part of being an independent adult.
Yeah I realised that from its tone. Sometimes thats why we Aussies askwell, I didn’t write it because you asked, but I was happy you asked so I could write it
Then I will repost my response, which is that your “proof” is faulty logic - a fault you have simply ignored. That fault is that the existence of unfilled jobs in one place does not mean that a person in another place could potentially fill that job, or even if he is in the same place, if the job requires skills or other resources that the person does not possess, he cannot take that job. The observation about turnover is also faulty logic because the fact that there are people who are unreliable as workers does not mean everyone in his class is jobless because they are unreliable.I’ll repost what I said before you went on a tear:
goout:
This is the reality that employers live with.To my knowledge there are plenty of jobs for everyone who really wants one. Go to any employment or staffing agency and ask them. The issue is the willingness to work and stay with a job more than a day or two. The rise of staffing agencies is due to the loss of the work ethic. Employers do not want the hassle of the employee revolving door.
to which you replied with accusations ranging from racism on my part to indifference toward the poor. You really went way overboard here.
But that was not what you asked:I can never learn anothers pov unless I ask.
I saw a few mentions of the great reset here and there, and I looked it up.Can you please explain what this is all about and its errors, who exactly is propagating it.
LOL, I looked up that caviar, which is like $110K/kilogram, and now I am getting ads for incredibly expensive caviar on my ads here.Yeah I realised that from its tone. Sometimes thats why we Aussies ask
Early in the Obama administration, they did internally float the idea of “trading” peoples’ 401Ks and IRAs for life annuities to be paid by the government. It caused a firestorm and they shelved it. But I doubt the leftists have forgotten the idea.What? Who is discussing a 90% tax rate? Unless you’re actually Bezos or Zuckerberg I don’t think you have much to worry about.
They vary a lot, though. In some of them, it’s “Medicaid with deductibles” for the bottom third or so and a private system a lot like ours used to be, for the top third. In at least one, you pay your own bill then bill the government for it and hope you get repaid the 80%.As far as I’m aware every OECD member has universal healthcare, bar one. Three guesses which one that is.
That was my way of asking the op to explain his pov. I did make it clearer withBut that was not what you asked:
Obviously it was not clear enough because there is still confusion.I like hearing peoples views on it, rather then reading endless links that may not be their views
I looked it up and asked what it was because I had not heard of it before and did not want to end up on a disinformation site. A couple of people posted good links in response.I saw a few mentions of the great reset here and there, and I looked it up.
Yep me too, learning the hard way after having something being called an ‘imperious’ way of making a request. That statement would be seen as intentionally incredibly offensive in Australia. Obviously it is not regarded that way where its statement maker lives.Also, remember we can’t hear your tone of voice, that is why I use emoticons. I found out the hard way
The great reset! It wants to be good scotch.LOL, I looked up that caviar, which is like $110K/kilogram, and now I am getting ads for incredibly expensive caviar on my ads here.
Next they will hit this poor teetotaler with ads for $50K scotch!