The Hitler question

  • Thread starter Thread starter SILVERNAME
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Christ, Himself was betrayed by one of His Chosen Apostles.

Why would things be any different now?

+Pax Christi,
-Dawn
 
Did Stalin ever proclaim Christ?
At some point when he was in training to be a priest of Christ, yeah, I’m guessing he did.

Voltaire was in training to be a Jesuit. Same thing.

They were not Christians when they were well-known. They left.

But it is asinine to say they never knew Christ, when Stalin was in training to become His agent on earth. Someone sets up to be somebody’s personal assistant–actually to be his living ikon–it’s ridiculous to say “He never knew him.”

Perhaps he never really knew Christ, but that is not something we can judge, anymore than we can judge whether he was damned (especially since it’d definitely be a factor). Smart money’s on no, he didn’t know Christ and yes, he’s damned, but I wouldn’t risk any kind of walkin’ around money on either.
 

At some point when he was in training to be a priest of Christ, yeah, I’m guessing he did.

Voltaire was in training to be a Jesuit. Same thing.

They were not Christians when they were well-known. They left.

But it is asinine to say they never knew Christ, when Stalin was in training to become His agent on earth. Someone sets up to be somebody’s personal assistant–actually to be his living ikon–it’s ridiculous to say “He never knew him.”

**This was in the form of a question if they ever proclaimed Christ. So, the question is asisnine? **

Perhaps he never really knew Christ, but that is not something we can judge, anymore than we can judge whether he was damned (especially since it’d definitely be a factor). Smart money’s on no, he didn’t know Christ and yes, he’s damned, but I wouldn’t risk any kind of walkin’ around money on either.
**Your above paragraph contradicts your first since you are assuming yourself “…on no, he didn’t know Christ…”

Not a consistent train of thought. It is all over the lot. So where and with who does the “asinine” appellation fix itself? Or, hopefully, I am misreading your followups as wanting to just be argumentative. **
 
Hitler, although raised Catholic, was profoundly anti-Catholic and considered Christianity to be of Jewish origin; in fact, consistent neo-Nazis to this day consider Christianity a sort of “Judaism for Gentiles.” Nazism is of occult, anti-Christian origin, and the Nazi party was, before Hitler took over, the political arm of the occult Thule society.
The Nazi’s despised the Catholic Church because of the Churches condemnation of eugenics. Many Catholic religious and lay persons ended up in concentration camps.
In Woodrow Wilson presidency, Progressive eugenic policies were envied and copied by the Europeans. M. Sangers “Negro Project” which later evolved into planned parenthood, was a model, as well as the Progressives aggressive policy of sterlizing retarded, deformed & and what was then considered unplesant people of that time.
 
When Mao was asked what he thought of the French Revolution his response was reported to be “Too early to tell.” I feel the same about Hitler, Stalin and Mussolini. It will take a long time before historians can take a scholarly, unemotional, look at the first half of the 20th century.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top