The Mother of God

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mickey
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
april_hosen:
Hi Marty,
I probably should of reworded that a bit. What I meant is Jesus died but when he resurected he overcame death. Do youunderstand what I’m trying to get across? 🙂
April,
I totally get what you are saying now. Thanks.

matt:thumbsup:
 
I don’t have any problem with the title Mother of God - theokotos.
That’s what Mary was, the mother of Our Lord.
BUT - I do not accept the teaching of the Immaculate Conception, The Assumption of Mary, her perpetual virginity, and Marian apparitions.

I’m not trying to offend anyone here, but it’s been my experience in the Catholic church that although the Catechism states that worship is to be given to God alone, that people do pray TO Mary. I’m not saying it’s everyone or even the majority, but I know it because they have told me as much.

I’m not interested in definitions and delineations of dulia, hyper-dulia, and latria - again sorry. I have seen some very untenable explanations of what some of this “Mary worship” is supposed to be. One explanation was that we should pray to Mary to intercede with Jesus for us because Jesus was just waiting to smite us all and that Mary would be able to persuade Him to have mercy on us. If there is one Mediator between God and man - Jesus, do we now by the above explanation also have Mary (and / or many other Mediators) between us and Jesus who is the Mediator between Mary and God?
My mother-in-law recently told my daughter that she can pray TO Mary. This woman claims to be Catholic, but she believes in reincarnation!

I just can’t support that.
 
Wow,
So many opinions and replies!🙂 Gosh, I feel like I’m in trouble. Okay to Little Marys reply that was at 8:33pm:
I dont really have a bibical reference based on my statements on wether or not she sinned they are simply basic assumptions becuase Mary was a human, (any disagreement with that?) so therefore I put two and two together and since Job 14:4 says “who can bring a clan thing out of an unclean? No one!” I figured that meant that no one is without sin. Am I misinterpreting? On when she died or if she died, the Bible doesnt really mention a death of Mary at all. There’s actuallly not a lot on Mary that didnt concern Jesus. But then again I havent exactly memorized the whole Bible. So theres response to that.

Milliardo,
Hello, what I said to Little Mary regarding your question “Where’s your proof Mary has sinned?” Also you said that “There are two views on this: one is that she was assumed to heaven. Though not in the Bible, there are precedents of this” Hmm ok Revelations 22:18 says, “For I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to these things, God will add to him the plagues written in this book.” Hmm so if its not in the Bible it spirtually its not true, correct? Or am I misinterpreting?

Subrosa,
Hi, that is actually kinda intresting. thank you.

Little Mary,
Hi again, just so you know I’m not so young.But in all honesty my ignorance is abundant when it comes to the Catholic religion, thats why I’m here. John 3:16 says " For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believes in Him shall not perish but have everlasting life." Thatdoesnt say whosoever has a lot of Grace gets in to heavean thats whosoever believes in Him.
Thank you all for taking the time to “educate me”.
 
Hello April,
" Who can bring a clean thing out of an unclean? not one."
Job 14:4

This actually supports the Catholic position, I am not sure how it does apply to your understanding. Here I will explain…

Was Jesus pure, was he God? Who can give birth to Jesus if they are not clean?

That would be the Catholic understanding. There is a whole lot more that just that one scripture, if you would like to discuss the sinlessness of Mary start a thread. I am sure many would give you a well rounded and insightful answer to your question.

There are good answers to the other parts of your post also, example: Revelation 22:18 was talking about revelation. It also is not adding but clarifying understanding to the faith.

EA_Man,
I have seen people do the same sort of thing with Mary(worship), or done innappropiate things in the Catholic Church, like believe in reincarnation as you said. But you did also say that this is not what the Church teaches and that is the important part.
I know that there are some Protestants who are in prison for raping\killing people, does that mean the Bible teaches you should as a Christian go out and rape\kill people?

I pray that you look to see what the Church teaches as many people do misrepresent the Church or misunderstand it.

The CCC will explain the mediator bit better than I can, or I suggest you start a thread, if you want a better understanding.

God Bless.
Scylla
 
40.png
april_hosen:
I dont really have a bibical reference based on my statements on wether or not she sinned they are simply basic assumptions becuase Mary was a human
That is merely your assumption then? Again, what is your basis? Yes, she was human, but does that necessarily mean she sinned?
Hmm so if its not in the Bible it spirtually its not true, correct?
The Trinity is not in the Bible itself; is it spiritually untrue then? The word Bible isn’t there as well; is that spiritually untrue? How about Sunday worship–can you find it there aside from Acts 17?
 
40.png
april_hosen:
Wow,
So many opinions and replies!🙂 Gosh, I feel like I’m in trouble. Okay to Little Marys reply that was at 8:33pm:
I dont really have a bibical reference based on my statements on wether or not she sinned they are simply basic assumptions becuase Mary was a human, (any disagreement with that?) so therefore I put two and two together and since Job 14:4 says “who can bring a clan thing out of an unclean? No one!” I figured that meant that no one is without sin. Am I misinterpreting? On when she died or if she died, the Bible doesnt really mention a death of Mary at all. There’s actuallly not a lot on Mary that didnt concern Jesus. But then again I havent exactly memorized the whole Bible. So theres response to that.

Milliardo,
Hello, what I said to Little Mary regarding your question “Where’s your proof Mary has sinned?” Also you said that “There are two views on this: one is that she was assumed to heaven. Though not in the Bible, there are precedents of this” Hmm ok Revelations 22:18 says, “For I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to these things, God will add to him the plagues written in this book.” Hmm so if its not in the Bible it spirtually its not true, correct? Or am I misinterpreting?

Subrosa,
Hi, that is actually kinda intresting. thank you.

Little Mary,
Hi again, just so you know I’m not so young.But in all honesty my ignorance is abundant when it comes to the Catholic religion, thats why I’m here. John 3:16 says " For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believes in Him shall not perish but have everlasting life." Thatdoesnt say whosoever has a lot of Grace gets in to heavean thats whosoever believes in Him.
Thank you all for taking the time to “educate me”.
Hey April,
You have gotten good responses from others, but I want to expand on something Milliardo said. Just because one is human does not imply necessary sin. In fact when we sin, we are being *inhuman *(or acting against our true nature made in the image of God). Examples would be Jesus Christ who is “true God and true man” and Adam and Eve. Jesus Christ had a human nature and was sinless, and Adam and Eve were without sin before Original Sin yet were still fully human thorughout their life. Do you see the trend here??? Without Original Sin, a person can live a sinless life. And as for the verse from Job, there is someone who can bring clean out by preventing the unclean from ever happening: God. That is the Catholic understanding of the Dogma of the Immaculate Conception:

In the Constitution Ineffabilis Deus of 8 December, 1854, Pius IX pronounced and defined that the Blessed Virgin Mary “in the first instance of her conception, by a singular privilege and grace granted by God, in view of the merits of Jesus Christ, the Saviour of the human race, was preserved exempt from all stain of original sin.” (newadvent.org/cathen/07674d.htm).

A singular Grace from the Sacrafice of Jesus on the Cross at Calvary was applied to Mary from conception.

Hmmm with your quote from Revelations about the “Books”, where does one find the canon (list) of the Books in the Bible??? When John died (the presumed author of Revelations), the New Testament had not been codified. Martin Luther, the igniter of the Protestant Reformation added words in his German translations (ex. “alone” in Romans 3:28). Do Protestants believe that the verse from Revelations applies to Martin Luther and the churches founded off of his beliefs???

Lastly, would you say we are saved by Faith or Grace??? Thanks and God Bless.
 
Here are some other views!

Along with virtually all important Protestant Founders (e.g., Calvin, Zwingli, Cranmer), Martin Luther accepted the traditional belief in the perpetual virginity of Mary (Jesus had no blood brothers), and her status as the Theotokos (Mother of God):

“It is a sweet and pious belief that the infusion of Mary’s soul was effected without original sin; so that in the very infusion of her soul she was also purified from original sin and adorned with God’s gifts, receiving a pure soul infused by God; thus from the first moment she began to live she was free from all sin. She is full of grace, proclaimed to be entirely without sin- something exceedingly great. For God’s grace fills her with everything good and makes her devoid of all evil”. (Martin Luther)

“The veneration of Mary is inscribed in the very depths of the human heart”. (Martin Luther)

“No woman is like you. You are more than Eve or Sarah, blessed above all nobility, wisdom, and sanctity”. (Martin Luther)

His views of Mary as Mother of God and as ever-Virgin were identical to those in Catholicism, and his opinions on the Immaculate Conception, Mary’s “Spiritual Motherhood” and the use of the “Hail Mary” were substantially the same. He didn’t deny the Assumption (he certainly didn’t hesitate to rail against doctrines he opposed!), and venerated Mary in a very touching fashion which, as far as it goes, is not at all contrary to Catholic piety.

John Calvin:** **

“There have been certain folk who have wished to suggest that from this passage (Matt 1:25) that the Virgin Mary had other children than the Son of God, and that Joseph then dwelt with her later; but what folly this is! For the gospel writer did not wish to record what happened afterwards; he simply wished to make clear Joseph’s obedience and to show also that Joseph had been well and truly assured that it was God who had sent His angel to Mary. He had therefore never dwelt with her nor had he shared her company…And besides this Our Lord Jesus Christ is called the first-born. This is not because there was a second or a third, but because the gospel writer is paying regard to the precedence. Scripture speaks thus of naming the first-born whether or not there was any question of the second.” (Sermon on Matthew 1:22-25, published 1562.)

“I firmly believe that Mary, according to the words of the gospel as a pure Virgin brought forth for us the Son of God and in childbirth and after childbirth forever remained a pure, intact Virgin.” (Ulrich Zwingli, Zwingli Opera, Corpus Reformatorum, Volume 1, 424)
 
Good afternoon, and Happy Mothers day.
Scylla,
I’m trying to understand how you came to the conclusion that the Trinity isnt in the Bible. The Trinity, is the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost, yes? The Trinity is mentioned many times in the Bible. To name a few, Genesis 1:26, “And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness.” Genesis 3:22, “And the Lord God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil.” Mathew 28:19, " Go ye therefore and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Ghost."
Also I think you may be misunderstanding “virgin”. Just because Mary was a virgin doesnt neccesarily mean she was spirtually and physically pure. I am a virgin, but I know I have made sinned more times than I can count. I also love God as Mary loves God, but I know I’m not on the same plateau as Jesus Christ. Nothing besides His blood could get me close to that. Mary was another of God’s tools. Just as each one of His followers will be used to show God’s Glory. I think in sometimes the glory is focused on the wrong person. Its like worshipping the creation instead of the Creator. Do you see what I mean?
Thank You For Your Time, God Bless
 
Hi April,
If Mary isn’t the Mother of God (Jesus the second Person), then when exactly did Jesus take on His divinity? The problem that my fellow Protestants have with this is that they fail to recognize that the title speaks more about Jesus than it does about Mary.
Peace.
 
40.png
april_hosen:
Every human has made a mistake or has sinned theres no getting around that. I dont know what Marys sins were but I’m positive she had sinned. Mary was not the equivilant of God on any factor-that was point. She was human, thats why she died. Jesus didnt die. God never died. Do you see where I’m gettin at?🙂
Do you believe in an omniscient, omnipotent, and omnipresent God? If you believe that God stands outside of our time, but can see our past, present, and future with greater clarity than we can see the screen in front of our faces now, then God knew in advance who would bear His son into the world. (This foreknowledge, by the way, does not mean that Mary was forced into this position. She had free will. Unlike Eve, Mary chose to follow God’s plan for her life. Her unique selection still represents a glorius mystery, however.) So, God knew who would bear His son in advance. We can probably all agree this far. If this is true, wouldn’t God want to shelter this precious vessel from the harm of the stain of sin, even original sin? Wouldn’t God the Father have wanted the best for His son, and wouldn’t this have been easily within His power to accomplish?

Besides, how could such pure goodness (in the form of baby Jesus) co-exist so closely with the stain of evil? That would seem akin to mixing matter and anti-matter and being surprised at the resulting bang–followed by smoking hair and singed eyebrows. Given the loving and merciful nature of God combined with His perfect and sinless nature, we conclude that Mary must have been free from sin in order to accomplish this task.

Last but not least, the declaration of Mary being “blessed among women” at the annunciation is another indicator of her special status. Everything taken together leads to a pretty compelling arguement that Mary was without sin.

For the rough fraft of an article on Mary, feel free to drop by the page below.

home.earthlink.net/~karlerickson/writer/id16.html
 
40.png
april_hosen:
Every human has made a mistake or has sinned theres no getting around that. I dont know what Marys sins were but I’m positive she had sinned. Mary was not the equivilant of God on any factor-that was point. She was human, thats why she died. Jesus didnt die. God never died. Do you see where I’m gettin at?🙂
I spent ten minutes typing up a response to this, then it disappeared when I hit submit. So… I am going to cheat and copy a paragraph from an article of mine concerning Mary in the Catholic Church. I will post the link to the article below the excerpt.

When discussing the Catholic understanding of Mary it is also only natural to mention the Immaculate Conception. This dogma, made official by Pope Pius IX in 1854, declares that Mary was free from the stain of original sin. As The Catechism of the Catholic Church describes it, she was “redeemed from the moment of her conception”. While this mystery may be challenging to grasp at first, it makes greater sense if one reflects upon it. If we acknowledge that God is outside of time, then we can understand the implication of Mary’s predestination as hinted at in verses such as Ephesians 1:3-4. God was precisely aware who was destined to bear His Son into the world before even the arrival of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden. If we accept God is omniscient and possessed foreknowledge of the details of this miracle, then it only stands to reason that God would shelter this chosen one from the harmful effects of original sin. After all, how can the stain of sin co-exist so intimately (both physically and spiritually) with true good or "life itself, immutable ", as Saint Augustine describes God in his Confessions? Of course, another argument supporting the Immaculate Conception is found in Luke 1:28. How could Mary be “blessed among women”, if she harbored the stain of original sin?

home.earthlink.net/~karlerickson/writer/id16.html
 
40.png
april_hosen:
Every human has made a mistake or has sinned theres no getting around that. I dont know what Marys sins were but I’m positive she had sinned. Mary was not the equivilant of God on any factor-that was point. She was human, thats why she died. Jesus didnt die. God never died. Do you see where I’m gettin at?🙂
Okay…anyone else having problems posting today? This is my third attempt to reply to this post. I had another response written, but it was lost when I hit submit. That being the case, I am going to copy from a rough draft of an article of mine. I will put the link under the excerpt.

When discussing the Catholic understanding of Mary it is also only natural to mention the Immaculate Conception. This dogma, made official by Pope Pius IX in 1854, declares that Mary was free from the stain of original sin. As The Catechism of the Catholic Church describes it, she was “redeemed from the moment of her conception”. While this mystery may be challenging to grasp at first, it makes greater sense if one reflects upon it. If we acknowledge that God is outside of time, then we can understand the implication of Mary’s predestination as hinted at in verses such as Ephesians 1:3-4. God was precisely aware who was destined to bear His Son into the world before even the arrival of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden. If we accept God is omniscient and possessed foreknowledge of the details of this miracle, then it only stands to reason that God would shelter this chosen one from the harmful effects of original sin. After all, how can the stain of sin co-exist so intimately (both physically and spiritually) with true good or "life itself, immutable ", as Saint Augustine describes God in his Confessions? Of course, another argument supporting the Immaculate Conception is found in Luke 1:28. How could Mary be “blessed among women”, if she harbored the stain of original sin?
home.earthlink.net/~karlerickson/writer/id16.html
 
Hi Milliardo,
How are you? I hope you are doing well. I think you might be misunderstanding what I said. Please see this message below from for biblical reference.

"Further, it is not true that Mary never committed an actual sin. In her magnificent psalm uttered while carrying the Christ child, she exclaimed: “My soul doth magnify the Lord, and my spirit has rejoiced in God my Savior” (Lk. 1:47). Observe that she referred to the Lord as “my Savior” - not merely “a Savior,” or “the Savior.” No sinless person needs a Savior. Clearly this statement implies that Mary was a sinner just like the rest of us (Rom. 3:23). Doubtless she was one of the noblest ladies ever to grace this planet; nevertheless, she was not without sin (cf. 1 Jn. 1:8,10).

The motto of Catholicism is vox populi vox Dei (the voice of the people is the voice of God). The Roman system is a law unto itself, substituting human will (Col. 2:23) for the authoritative revelation of God. As Attwater asserts:

“It is an article of faith from a decree of the Vatican Council that Tradition is a source of theological teaching distinct from Scripture, and that it is infallible. It is therefore to be received with the same internal assent as Scripture for it is the word of God. Whereas much of the teaching of Scripture could not be determined without Tradition, Tradition would suffice without Scripture; it is the safeguard of Scripture” (p. 42). Such a statement is nothing short of blasphemy (speaking against) of the word of God (cf. Tit. 2:5)."

As for known truths, she was a human being and such she sinned for ALL human beings are fallable. There is no disputing that. If human beings were sinnless, then we would not need the holiness and grace of God now would we? Our sin, Mary’s sin, is part of His perfect design to have His Son, Jesus, crusified for our sin. Jesus was Mary’s Lord and Savior too. And ONLY He is blameless before God, no one else, not even Mary… Please do not confuse immaculate conception with being sinless. Mary played a pivitol role in the life of Christ, but praying to her, holding her up before God is false idoltry. Jesus clearly states in scripture, Exodus 20:3 “You will have no other gods before me…” We are all saints before Christ as Christ’s children and none of us should be worshipped or held between God and his relationship with his children. Christ desires a personal, intimate relationship with us directly and this debate over whether or not Mary sinned interferes with focus and comittment of this relationship. The focus should be on Christ, not on Mary. If Mary were alive today, I am sure she would gladly concede to this fact.

Thanks for listening and pray about this.
 
40.png
april_hosen:
Hi Milliardo,
How are you? I hope you are doing well. I think you might be misunderstanding what I said. Please see this message below from for biblical reference.

"Further, it is not true that Mary never committed an actual sin. In her magnificent psalm uttered while carrying the Christ child, she exclaimed: “My soul doth magnify the Lord, and my spirit has rejoiced in God my Savior” (Lk. 1:47). Observe that she referred to the Lord as “my Savior” - not merely “a Savior,” or “the Savior.” No sinless person needs a Savior. Clearly this statement implies that Mary was a sinner just like the rest of us (Rom. 3:23). Doubtless she was one of the noblest ladies ever to grace this planet; nevertheless, she was not without sin (cf. 1 Jn. 1:8,10).

The motto of Catholicism is vox populi vox Dei (the voice of the people is the voice of God). The Roman system is a law unto itself, substituting human will (Col. 2:23) for the authoritative revelation of God. As Attwater asserts:

“It is an article of faith from a decree of the Vatican Council that Tradition is a source of theological teaching distinct from Scripture, and that it is infallible. It is therefore to be received with the same internal assent as Scripture for it is the word of God. Whereas much of the teaching of Scripture could not be determined without Tradition, Tradition would suffice without Scripture; it is the safeguard of Scripture” (p. 42). Such a statement is nothing short of blasphemy (speaking against) of the word of God (cf. Tit. 2:5)."

As for known truths, she was a human being and such she sinned for ALL human beings are fallable. There is no disputing that. If human beings were sinnless, then we would not need the holiness and grace of God now would we? Our sin, Mary’s sin, is part of His perfect design to have His Son, Jesus, crusified for our sin. Jesus was Mary’s Lord and Savior too. And ONLY He is blameless before God, no one else, not even Mary… Please do not confuse immaculate conception with being sinless. Mary played a pivitol role in the life of Christ, but praying to her, holding her up before God is false idoltry. Jesus clearly states in scripture, Exodus 20:3 “You will have no other gods before me…” We are all saints before Christ as Christ’s children and none of us should be worshipped or held between God and his relationship with his children. Christ desires a personal, intimate relationship with us directly and this debate over whether or not Mary sinned interferes with focus and comittment of this relationship. The focus should be on Christ, not on Mary. If Mary were alive today, I am sure she would gladly concede to this fact.

Thanks for listening and pray about this.
Hello… I will leave the rest of your post to someone else, but I wanted to comment on the first paragraph. If you look at my post where I quoted the CCC, you will note that Mary was redeemed at the moment of her conception, according to the Church. Any other argument would lead one to the conclusion that you don’t believe in the omniscient nature of God. Furthermore, Mary’s use of the word “saviour” is not only true in a personal sense, but also in the sense of the Jewish people as a whole, of which she is a member. Any way you cut it, your argument doesn’t quite accomplish its goal in making us believe Mary harbored the stain of sin…
 
40.png
april_hosen:
I also love God as Mary loves God, but I know I’m not on the same plateau as Jesus Christ. Nothing besides His blood could get me close to that. Mary was another of God’s tools. Just as each one of His followers will be used to show God’s Glory. I think in sometimes the glory is focused on the wrong person. Its like worshipping the creation instead of the Creator. Do you see what I mean?
Thank You For Your Time, God Bless
Are you saying that some people put The Virgin Mary on the same plateau as Jesus? Are you saying that people worship her? Who are these people?
 
40.png
Milliardo:
Where’s your proof Mary has sinned?

There are two views on this: one is that she was assumed to heaven. Though not in the Bible, there are precedents of this, such as Enoch and Isaiah. The other view, held by the Orthodox Church, is the Dormition, or Mary simply fell asleep, but was bodily assumed to heaven (if my reading about the Dormition is correct).
The term “Falling Asleep” means the death of the body. We believe the Mother of God, being human and the inheriter of death because of the sin of Adam, fell asleep in the Lord and for three days lay in the tomb. St. Thomas upon hearing the death of the Mother of God wanted proof that she died and asked to see her tomb. (St. Thomas was always wanting physical proofs.) Upon removal of the tomb lid by the Apostles only the aroma of sweet flowers were all that was there. We believe that Mary was assumed into Heaven to join her Son after, not before her death.

StMarkEofE
 
40.png
april_hosen:
Hi Milliardo,
How are you? I hope you are doing well. I think you might be misunderstanding what I said. Please see this message below from for biblical reference.

"Further, it is not true that Mary never committed an actual sin. In her magnificent psalm uttered while carrying the Christ child, she exclaimed: “My soul doth magnify the Lord, and my spirit has rejoiced in God my Savior” (Lk. 1:47). Observe that she referred to the Lord as “my Savior” - not merely “a Savior,” or “the Savior.” No sinless person needs a Savior. Clearly this statement implies that Mary was a sinner just like the rest of us (Rom. 3:23). Doubtless she was one of the noblest ladies ever to grace this planet; nevertheless, she was not without sin (cf. 1 Jn. 1:8,10).
Yes, I am aware of the Magnificat; in fact, the Catholic position is very much in agreement with it: Mary was freed from sin by God, so that she could bear the Son. Now, the analogy here is a vessel (Mary), and we put in water in it. If the vessel is unclean, would the water be clean? Of course it wouldn’t. So God, in His wisdom, already forgave her original sin even before she was born.
 
40.png
april_hosen:
I’m trying to understand how you came to the conclusion that the Trinity isnt in the Bible.
The Trinity is only alluded to in the Bible; as such, if it were clearly defined, then we would not have had the heresies in the past that denies it, would we now? Or we would not hear about the Unitarians and Oneness Pentecostals, who deny the Trinity. Again, can you find the word “Trinity” in your Bible?
 
40.png
april_hosen:
“It is an article of faith from a decree of the Vatican Council that Tradition is a source of theological teaching distinct from Scripture, and that it is infallible. It is therefore to be received with the same internal assent as Scripture for it is the word of God. Whereas much of the teaching of Scripture could not be determined without Tradition, Tradition would suffice without Scripture; it is the safeguard of Scripture” (p. 42). Such a statement is nothing short of blasphemy (speaking against) of the word of God (cf. Tit. 2:5)."
Hmmm, you get bolder with every post. Now we’re all blasphemers huh?:hmmm: You must keep in mind that before the canon was established, (by the Catholic Church), people were taught by oral Tradition.(2 Thes, 2:15) Those pieces of Scripture that were floating around before the Church decided the canon, could not be read by many people due to high illiteracy rates.
40.png
april_hosen:
but praying to her, holding her up before God is false idoltry. Jesus clearly states in scripture, Exodus 20:3 “You will have no other gods before me…” We are all saints before Christ as Christ’s children and none of us should be worshipped or held between God and his relationship with his children. Christ desires a personal, intimate relationship with us directly and this debate over whether or not Mary sinned interferes with focus and comittment of this relationship. The focus should be on Christ, not on Mary. If Mary were alive today, I am sure she would gladly concede to this fact.
Now we’re all idol worshippers too. Hmmmm? :hmmm: Exodus 20:3 refers to worshipping false pagan gods. Please see Exodus 25:18, Numbers 21:8-9, 1Kings 6:29, 1Chrinicles 28:18-19, and 2 Chroncles 3: 10-13. The Catholic and the Orthodox Churches venerate Holy images and this is completely Scriptural. The Ever Virgin Mary and The Mother of our God is worthy of veneration. She always points to her Son. She is still alive today. You should pray about this so that your heart and mind may be awakened. Your escalating anti-Catholic rhetoric has become alarming.
 
40.png
StMarkEofE:
The term “Falling Asleep” means the death of the body. We believe the Mother of God, being human and the inheriter of death because of the sin of Adam, fell asleep in the Lord and for three days lay in the tomb. St. Thomas upon hearing the death of the Mother of God wanted proof that she died and asked to see her tomb. (St. Thomas was always wanting physical proofs.) Upon removal of the tomb lid by the Apostles only the aroma of sweet flowers were all that was there. We believe that Mary was assumed into Heaven to join her Son after, not before her death.

StMarkEofE
To add to this we also believe that St. Thomas was very distraught for the fact that he wasnt there at the time of St. Mary’s death and as such wanted to see her for the last time which is another reason for visiting her tomb.

StMarkEofE
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top