The Nature of Christ

  • Thread starter Thread starter steveyb3
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
sixofseven no need to be sorry, I’m happy to answer questions 🙂 Christadelphians pray only to the Father, through the Mediatorship of Jesus Christ. He makes intercession for his disciples. (Isaiah 53:12, 1 Tim 2:5). We do not pray to the dead as the dead know nothing (Ecclesiastes 9:4,5, Daniel 12:2). They are in a state of sleep. The responsible will be raised by Christ at his return (1 Thes 4:16). The judgement and resurrection do not happen until Christ returns. Christadelphians do not believe believers go to Heaven when you die. The Kingdom of God is upon the earth. (Daniel 2:35, Rev 11:15, Gen 13:15, Acts 1:6, Isaiah 2:2, Isaiah 11:6 etc).

Lapey, God is not the author of confusion. He would not teach a doctrine we can’t understand. The baptism of Christ does not have to do with a Tri-une God. God the Father annointed his Son with God’s Power (the Holy Spirit). Jesus did no miracles before he had the Holy Spirit. Men cannot do miracles without the Holy Spirit. Can you give me a resource showing an early church doctrine on the Trinity please? The writing is talking about those who deny Jesus came in the flesh. It does not mention those denying God came in the flesh. Jesus being the same flesh as us is imperative for an understanding of the (representative) sacrifice of Christ. There was a faction that denied Jesus had come in the flesh. They believed he was some kind of spirit. The faction was not one denying God had been incarnated in the flesh. 1 Cor 13:8, 9 and 10 say that tongues and prophecy will cease. People do not possess the Holy Spirit today, it was a temporary gift. If Jesus was God he would not have to be given power. The Apostles did not forgive sins. They were not ordained with the Priesthood. The High Priest in the Tabernacle did not forgive sin, he made atonement for himself and the people. Jesus made atonement for himself by the offering of blood (Heb 9:14) and for the people. The bread and wine are representative of Christ’s body and blood. Christ cannot be 100% man and 100% God. He was 100% man and after his resurrection God raised him from the dead to die no more. He then partook of the divine nature. Baptism is necessary for salvation. However, being baptized into Christ’s death is only beneficiary if Jesus shared the same nature as ours. If he was a God that had to atone for his immaculate nature (why?) then the baptism does not relate to us who have sinful flesh that needs atoning for. Jesus said he is Alpha and Omega only after he was resurrected and partook of the Divine Nature.

Reuben J, how does Jesus saying I and the Father are one imply a Trinity. There is no Holy Spirit mentioned. If Jesus said I am Co-Equal with the Father and the Holy Spirit, we are the three parts of the one Godhead then that would be a Trinity. As it is, Jesus said that he and the Father are one. One in purpose, one in mind, one in character. Jesus was God manifested in the flesh (1 Tim 3:16) but not God incarnated in the flesh. Jesus was given power to forgive sins as he was the Son of God. God was in Heaven (Matt 6:9) and God is greater than Christ (Matt 19:17). You cannot be both God and man. God is Spirit, man is flesh. Jesus was flesh as he died. God cannot die. Jesus now cannot die as he has been given immortality by God. The “Mother Church” did not give me the Bible. God inspired the writers of the Holy Scriptures.

Soren 1, thank you 🙂 If I may use an example. Let’s say Bob is “good” when he is born. Goodness was around before Bob. Lots of people are good. Bob is “good made flesh”. It was the goodness that was around before Bob. Bob did not exist before he was born. The Word has always existed, it was how God made the world and how he accomplished his plan through the promises to the Patriarchs, David etc. Jesus is the Word of God made flesh. The very plan and purpose of God, the fulfilment of the Bible (the Word) was made in human form (in the likeness of sinful flesh). The Word of God pre existed, but Jesus did not. Jesus “pre-existed” as the plan of God. He “pre-existed” as he was spoken of in Gen 3:15 and throughout the Law and the Prophets. Col 1:16 is concerning the New Creation in Christ, not the literal Creation. God created the literal Creation (Mark 10:6).

Techno2000, why do you believe the Creed has authority? Do you think the Creed is inspired? Why were more ecumenical councils needed?

Nine_Two, Jesus claimed to be the Messiah, the Son of God and never claimed to be God. In fact he claimed, “the Father is greater than I”.
 
sixofseven no need to be sorry, I’m happy to answer questions 🙂 Christadelphians pray only to the Father, through the Mediatorship of Jesus Christ. He makes intercession for his disciples. (Isaiah 53:12, 1 Tim 2:5). We do not pray to the dead as the dead know nothing (Ecclesiastes 9:4,5, Daniel 12:2). They are in a state of sleep. The responsible will be raised by Christ at his return (1 Thes 4:16). The judgement and resurrection do not happen until Christ returns. Christadelphians do not believe believers go to Heaven when you die. The Kingdom of God is upon the earth. (Daniel 2:35, Rev 11:15, Gen 13:15, Acts 1:6, Isaiah 2:2, Isaiah 11:6 etc).

Lapey, God is not the author of confusion. He would not teach a doctrine we can’t understand. The baptism of Christ does not have to do with a Tri-une God. God the Father annointed his Son with God’s Power (the Holy Spirit). Jesus did no miracles before he had the Holy Spirit. Men cannot do miracles without the Holy Spirit. Can you give me a resource showing an early church doctrine on the Trinity please? The writing is talking about those who deny Jesus came in the flesh. It does not mention those denying God came in the flesh. Jesus being the same flesh as us is imperative for an understanding of the (representative) sacrifice of Christ. There was a faction that denied Jesus had come in the flesh. They believed he was some kind of spirit. The faction was not one denying God had been incarnated in the flesh. 1 Cor 13:8, 9 and 10 say that tongues and prophecy will cease. People do not possess the Holy Spirit today, it was a temporary gift. If Jesus was God he would not have to be given power. The Apostles did not forgive sins. They were not ordained with the Priesthood. The High Priest in the Tabernacle did not forgive sin, he made atonement for himself and the people. Jesus made atonement for himself by the offering of blood (Heb 9:14) and for the people. The bread and wine are representative of Christ’s body and blood. Christ cannot be 100% man and 100% God. He was 100% man and after his resurrection God raised him from the dead to die no more. He then partook of the divine nature. Baptism is necessary for salvation. However, being baptized into Christ’s death is only beneficiary if Jesus shared the same nature as ours. If he was a God that had to atone for his immaculate nature (why?) then the baptism does not relate to us who have sinful flesh that needs atoning for. Jesus said he is Alpha and Omega only after he was resurrected and partook of the Divine Nature.

Reuben J, how does Jesus saying I and the Father are one imply a Trinity. There is no Holy Spirit mentioned. If Jesus said I am Co-Equal with the Father and the Holy Spirit, we are the three parts of the one Godhead then that would be a Trinity. As it is, Jesus said that he and the Father are one. One in purpose, one in mind, one in character. Jesus was God manifested in the flesh (1 Tim 3:16) but not God incarnated in the flesh. Jesus was given power to forgive sins as he was the Son of God. God was in Heaven (Matt 6:9) and God is greater than Christ (Matt 19:17). You cannot be both God and man. God is Spirit, man is flesh. Jesus was flesh as he died. God cannot die. Jesus now cannot die as he has been given immortality by God. The “Mother Church” did not give me the Bible. God inspired the writers of the Holy Scriptures.

Soren 1, thank you 🙂 If I may use an example. Let’s say Bob is “good” when he is born. Goodness was around before Bob. Lots of people are good. Bob is “good made flesh”. It was the goodness that was around before Bob. Bob did not exist before he was born. The Word has always existed, it was how God made the world and how he accomplished his plan through the promises to the Patriarchs, David etc. Jesus is the Word of God made flesh. The very plan and purpose of God, the fulfilment of the Bible (the Word) was made in human form (in the likeness of sinful flesh). The Word of God pre existed, but Jesus did not. Jesus “pre-existed” as the plan of God. He “pre-existed” as he was spoken of in Gen 3:15 and throughout the Law and the Prophets. Col 1:16 is concerning the New Creation in Christ, not the literal Creation. God created the literal Creation (Mark 10:6).

Techno2000, why do you believe the Creed has authority? Do you think the Creed is inspired? Why were more ecumenical councils needed?

Nine_Two, Jesus claimed to be the Messiah, the Son of God and never claimed to be God. In fact he claimed, “the Father is greater than I”.
Why does God say “US” and “OUR” ?

Latin Vulgate Bible
Douay-Rheims Bible
Genesis 1:
Book Of Genesis

26 “Let **us **make man to our image”
 
Techno2000, why do you believe the Creed has authority? Do you think the Creed is inspired? Why were more ecumenical councils needed?
Do you really think I 'm going to believe some Guy name John Thomas personal interpretation of the Bible… who pops up 1800 years later… over the Nicene Creed ?
 
Techno2000, God says “us” and “our” image as it is the Hebrew word, “Elohim”. Elohim is a plural word, telling us that God, although one, can be manifested in many. Elohim can be angels and the Judges in Israel are referred to as Elohim (1 Sam 2:25). Elohim are the manifestation of God. Those who the Word of God were revealed to are also referred to as Elohim (Psa 82:6).

No one is asking you to believe “John Thomas’ personal interpretation of the Bible.” John Thomas and Robert Roberts’ interpretation are based solely on the Bible and removed doctrines which Christianity picked up over the centuries. Why do you believe in a Creed? The Creed cannot be inspired as people continued to disagree with the issues “confirmed” at Nicea for another six more councils.
 
No one is asking you to believe “John Thomas’ personal interpretation of the Bible.” John Thomas and Robert Roberts’ interpretation are based solely on the Bible and removed doctrines which Christianity picked up over the centuries.
So, are you saying they were infallible in what they “removed” ?
 
Elohim is a plural word, telling us that God, although one, can be manifested in many.
So God can be “manifested” into “many”,but He just can’t be manifested into the Trinity ?:rolleyes:
 
Hello everyone,

I believe there is one God, Yahweh, the Father who can be manifested in many.

I believe that Jesus Christ, is the Son of God. I believe he was fully human and not divine.

Please can you tell me why you think God is a Trinity?
1 John 5:7

*KJV - For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

Duoay-Rheims - And there are three who give testimony in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost. And these three are one.*

The second part of the passage has been omitted out of a lot of translations. For example:

New International Version (NIV)
For there are three that testify:

New Living Translation (©2007)
So we have these three witnesses–

New American Standard Bible (©1995)
For there are three that testify:

Why omit it? Ecumenism, religious inclusiveness. Omitting certain versus we can include such groups as the Jehovah witnesses who don’t believe in the Trinity.
 
You stayed up later than me, unless you are on the other side of the world. Where are you located?

I’ll get back to the topics as soon as I can. I have to get some work done…lol
 
Jesus said he and the Father are one. This doesn’t imply a Trinity. He distinguishes between himself and the Father. He was one with the Father as he was the manifestation of God’s character. He was tempted in every way, yet did not sin. His perfect life made him one with the Father…
The devil did the tempting, but Jesus could not be tempted. A hugh difference! An obselete meaning of “tempted” is “to try or test.”

Matt 4:9"All this I will give you," he said, “if you will bow down and worship me.”

If Jesus was to consider this at all, Jesus would have to have darkness within his heart.

The devil has nothing to offer Christ that doesn’t belong to the Father.
 
No John Thomas and Robert Roberts were not infallible and did not claim to be. They were mere mortals whose Bible exposition was excellent. They were wrong on a few things as they were not inspired by the Holy Spirit.

God could be manifested in a Trinity if He wanted to. However, this idea is not in the Bible.

Shawn38, the verse is not found in any manuscripts before the third century and so it is rightfully omitted. Why include it? To include the doctrine of the Trinity. As well as this, look at the corruption of John 1 in some translations. It clearly says "This was the same in the beginning. Most have changed it to He was with God in the beginning- totally different. Also there are no capitals in the Greek and yet people put “Word” instead of “word” to try and make it Jesus. There are many examples of Trinitarian bias in certain translations. Including 1 John 5:7 is one such.

Of course Jesus could be tempted. Scripture is clear on that, “For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but we have one who has been tempted in every way, just as we are–yet was without sin.” By removing the temptations of Christ, you deny this verse and make his life on earth easy which it evidently was not. It was the hardest thing anyone ever had to do. Jesus was tempted from within as he was made of the same flesh as us, “Therefore he was obligated in all things to be made like his brothers, that he might become a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make atonement for the sins of the people.”

I am located in England.
 
sixofseven no need to be sorry, I’m happy to answer questions 🙂 Christadelphians pray only to the Father, through the Mediatorship of Jesus Christ. He makes intercession for his disciples. (Isaiah 53:12, 1 Tim 2:5). We do not pray to the dead as the dead know nothing (Ecclesiastes 9:4,5, Daniel 12:2). They are in a state of sleep. The responsible will be raised by Christ at his return (1 Thes 4:16). The judgement and resurrection do not happen until Christ returns. Christadelphians do not believe believers go to Heaven when you die. The Kingdom of God is upon the earth. (Daniel 2:35, Rev 11:15, Gen 13:15, Acts 1:6, Isaiah 2:2, Isaiah 11:6 etc).

Lapey, God is not the author of confusion. He would not teach a doctrine we can’t understand. The baptism of Christ does not have to do with a Tri-une God. God the Father annointed his Son with God’s Power (the Holy Spirit). Jesus did no miracles before he had the Holy Spirit. Men cannot do miracles without the Holy Spirit. Can you give me a resource showing an early church doctrine on the Trinity please? The writing is talking about those who deny Jesus came in the flesh. It does not mention those denying God came in the flesh. Jesus being the same flesh as us is imperative for an understanding of the (representative) sacrifice of Christ. There was a faction that denied Jesus had come in the flesh. They believed he was some kind of spirit. The faction was not one denying God had been incarnated in the flesh. 1 Cor 13:8, 9 and 10 say that tongues and prophecy will cease. People do not possess the Holy Spirit today, it was a temporary gift. If Jesus was God he would not have to be given power. The Apostles did not forgive sins. They were not ordained with the Priesthood. The High Priest in the Tabernacle did not forgive sin, he made atonement for himself and the people. Jesus made atonement for himself by the offering of blood (Heb 9:14) and for the people. The bread and wine are representative of Christ’s body and blood. Christ cannot be 100% man and 100% God. He was 100% man and after his resurrection God raised him from the dead to die no more. He then partook of the divine nature. Baptism is necessary for salvation. However, being baptized into Christ’s death is only beneficiary if Jesus shared the same nature as ours. If he was a God that had to atone for his immaculate nature (why?) then the baptism does not relate to us who have sinful flesh that needs atoning for. Jesus said he is Alpha and Omega only after he was resurrected and partook of the Divine Nature.

Reuben J, how does Jesus saying I and the Father are one imply a Trinity. There is no Holy Spirit mentioned. If Jesus said I am Co-Equal with the Father and the Holy Spirit, we are the three parts of the one Godhead then that would be a Trinity. As it is, Jesus said that he and the Father are one. One in purpose, one in mind, one in character. Jesus was God manifested in the flesh (1 Tim 3:16) but not God incarnated in the flesh. Jesus was given power to forgive sins as he was the Son of God. God was in Heaven (Matt 6:9) and God is greater than Christ (Matt 19:17). You cannot be both God and man. God is Spirit, man is flesh. Jesus was flesh as he died. God cannot die. Jesus now cannot die as he has been given immortality by God. The “Mother Church” did not give me the Bible. God inspired the writers of the Holy Scriptures.

Soren 1, thank you 🙂 If I may use an example. Let’s say Bob is “good” when he is born. Goodness was around before Bob. Lots of people are good. Bob is “good made flesh”. It was the goodness that was around before Bob. Bob did not exist before he was born. The Word has always existed, it was how God made the world and how he accomplished his plan through the promises to the Patriarchs, David etc. Jesus is the Word of God made flesh. The very plan and purpose of God, the fulfilment of the Bible (the Word) was made in human form (in the likeness of sinful flesh). The Word of God pre existed, but Jesus did not. Jesus “pre-existed” as the plan of God. He “pre-existed” as he was spoken of in Gen 3:15 and throughout the Law and the Prophets. Col 1:16 is concerning the New Creation in Christ, not the literal Creation. God created the literal Creation (Mark 10:6).

Techno2000, why do you believe the Creed has authority? Do you think the Creed is inspired? Why were more ecumenical councils needed?

Nine_Two, Jesus claimed to be the Messiah, the Son of God and never claimed to be God. In fact he claimed, “the Father is greater than I”.
May I ask a question are you a JW
 
No, I am a Christadelphian, not a Jehovah’s Witness. Christadelphians have some things in common with JW’s but lots of things different.
 
This is most of an article by Matt Slick, I removed some of the less pertinant information, pretty much touches all that needs to be said. BTW, he is not Catholic.

There are cult groups (Jehovah’s Witnesses, The Way International, Christadelphians, etc.) who deny the Trinity and state that the doctrine was not mentioned until the 4th Century until after the time of the Council of Nicea (325). This council “was called by Emperor Constantine to deal with the error of Arianism [see page 45] which was threatening the unity of the Christian Church.”

Polycarp (70-155/160). Bishop of Smyrna. Disciple of John the Apostle.
“O Lord God almighty… I bless you and glorify you through the eternal and heavenly high priest Jesus Christ, your beloved Son, through whom be glory to you, with Him and the Holy Spirit, both now and forever” (n. 14, ed. Funk; PG 5.1040).

Justin Martyr (100?-165?). He was a Christian apologist and martyr.
“For, in the name of God, the Father and Lord of the universe, and of our Savior Jesus Christ, and of the Holy Spirit, they then receive the washing with water” (First Apol., LXI).

Ignatius of Antioch (died 98/117). Bishop of Antioch. He wrote much in defense of Christianity.
“In Christ Jesus our Lord, by whom and with whom be glory and power to the Father with the Holy Spirit for ever” (n. 7; PG 5.988).
“We have also as a Physician the Lord our God Jesus the Christ the only-begotten Son and Word, before time began, but who afterwards became also man, of Mary the virgin. For ‘the Word was made flesh.’ Being incorporeal, He was in the body; being impassible, He was in a passable body; being immortal, He was in a mortal body; being life, He became subject to corruption, that He might free our souls from death and corruption, and heal them, and might restore them to health, when they were diseased with ungodliness and wicked lusts.” (Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson, eds., The ante-Nicene Fathers, Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1975 rpt., Vol. 1, p. 52, Ephesians 7.)

Irenaeus (115-190). As a boy he listened to Polycarp, the disciple of John. He became Bishop of Lyons.
“The Church, though dispersed throughout the whole world, even to the ends of the earth, has received from the apostles and their disciples this faith: …one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all things that are in them; and in one Christ Jesus, the Son of God, who became incarnate for our salvation; and in the Holy Spirit, who proclaimed through the prophets the dispensations of God, and the advents, and the birth from a virgin, and the passion, and the resurrection from the dead, and the ascension into heaven in the flesh of the beloved Christ Jesus, our Lord, and His manifestation from heaven in the glory of the Father ‘to gather all things in one,’ and to raise up anew all flesh of the whole human race, in order that to Christ Jesus, our Lord, and God, and Savior, and King, according to the will of the invisible Father, ‘every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth, and that every tongue should confess; to him, and that He should execute just judgment towards all…’” (Against Heresies X.l)

Tertullian (160-215). African apologist and theologian. He wrote much in defense of Christianity.
“We define that there are two, the Father and the Son, and three with the Holy Spirit, and this number is made by the pattern of salvation… [which] brings about unity in trinity, interrelating the three, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. They are three, not in dignity, but in degree, not in substance but in form, not in power but in kind. They are of one substance and power, because there is one God from whom these degrees, forms and kinds devolve in the name of Father, Son and Holy Spirit.” (Adv. Prax. 23; PL 2.156-7).

Origen (185-254). Alexandrian theologian. Defended Christianity and wrote much about Christianity.
“If anyone would say that the Word of God or the Wisdom of God had a beginning, let him beware lest he direct his impiety rather against the unbegotten Father, since he denies that he was always Father, and that he has always begotten the Word, and that he always had wisdom in all previous times or ages or whatever can be imagined in priority… There can be no more ancient title of almighty God than that of Father, and it is through the Son that he is Father” (De Princ. 1.2.; PG 11.132).

If, as the anti-Trinitarians maintain, the Trinity is not a biblical doctrine and was never taught until the council of Nicea in 325, then why do these quotes exist? The answer is simple: the Trinity is a biblical doctrine and it was taught before the council of Nicea in 325 A.D.

Part of the reason that the Trinity doctrine was not “officially” taught until the time of the Council of Nicea is because Christianity was illegal until shortly before the council. It wasn’t really possible for official Christian groups to meet and discuss doctrine. For the most part, they were fearful of making public pronouncements concerning their faith.
Additionally, if a group had attacked the person of Adam, the early church would have responded with an official doctrine of who Adam was. As it was, the person of Christ was attacked. When the Church defended the deity of Christ, the doctrine of the Trinity was further defined.

The early church believed in the Trinity, as is evidenced by the quotes above, and it wasn’t necessary to really make them official. It wasn’t until errors started to creep in that councils began to meet to discuss the Trinity, as well as other doctrines that came under fire.
 
Sorry about the length of the post, I know ot violates the “no long post, especially quotes” rule.
 
Am I the only one confused?

We have the OP say that Jesus could forgive sins but is not God because he is Emmanuel, God with us.

We have another poster say that Jesus could forgive sins because he IS God because he is Emmanuel, God with us.

Mental gymnastics make me tired.
 
No, I am a Christadelphian, not a Jehovah’s Witness. Christadelphians have some things in common with JW’s but lots of things different.
Well we know that the JW are a cult, so is the Christadelphians all so one
 
Matt Slick does us a disservice there. Christadelphians and myself included do not say the Trinity doctrine was not around until the Council of Nicea. In my (unedited) post, I said it was confirmed at Nicea.

Thank you for the early church references.

“O Lord God almighty… I bless you and glorify you through the eternal and heavenly high priest Jesus Christ, your beloved Son, through whom be glory to you, with Him and the Holy Spirit, both now and forever.” No where in this lovely statement of faith is the Trinity mentioned. The praise of God the Father is mentioned as coming through (the mediatorship) of the Son, Jesus Christ. The Holy Spirit is said to have glory and yes, the power of God is glorious. The mention of Father, Son and Holy Spirit in the same sentence does not prove a Trinity. Nothing descriptive such as, co-equal or co-eternal occurs. Note the praise goes to the Father through the Son.

“For, in the name of God, the Father and Lord of the universe, and of our Savior Jesus Christ, and of the Holy Spirit, they then receive the washing with water.” I do not see how this is used as evidence for a Trinity. Please elaborate.

As far as I am aware, Ignatius has letters attributed to him which were not written by him.

“one God, the Father Almighty, Maker of heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all things that are in them; and in one Christ Jesus, the Son of God, who became incarnate for our salvation; and in the Holy Spirit, who proclaimed through the prophets the dispensations of God, and the advents, and the birth from a virgin, and the passion, and the resurrection from the dead, and the ascension into heaven in the flesh of the beloved Christ Jesus, our Lord, and His manifestation from heaven in the glory of the Father.” Note one Father, not three in one. One Christ Jesus, not three in one. Son of God- not God the Son. The Holy Spirit is not spoken of as a person of part of the Godhead. Jesus is called Lord and God after his resurrection, when he is a partaker of the divine nature. Jesus is now a partaker in Theos as the immortalized Saints will be in the future.

Tertullian is after the first century. As is Origen.

The Trinity is not in the Bible. It was taught before the Council of Nicea. Anyone who denies this is misinformed. Please accept apologies on their behalf from me if you have heard a Christadelphian say it was not taught before 324/5. It was confirmed as Orthodox at Nicea. It was not taught in the first century though.

Ralphinal, Jesus was given authority to forgive sins as he was the Son of God. The rest of the verse clearly says the men praised God (the Father who was in Heaven, not on earth) who had given authority to men. Jesus was the man (not God) who God (the Father) had given authority to forgive sins.

The disciples worshiped Jesus as the Son of God. To claim he is the Son of God is a form of worship. They did not worship him as Creator of Heaven and earth. Yahweh, God the Father is the Creator of Heaven and earth who can be accessed by the mediatorship of the man (not God) of Jesus Christ.
 
sixofseven no need to be sorry, I’m happy to answer questions 🙂 Christadelphians pray only to the Father, through the Mediatorship of Jesus Christ. He makes intercession for his disciples. (Isaiah 53:12, 1 Tim 2:5). We do not pray to the dead as the dead know nothing (Ecclesiastes 9:4,5, Daniel 12:2). They are in a state of sleep. The responsible will be raised by Christ at his return (1 Thes 4:16). The judgement and resurrection do not happen until Christ returns. Christadelphians do not believe believers go to Heaven when you die. The Kingdom of God is upon the earth. (Daniel 2:35, Rev 11:15, Gen 13:15, Acts 1:6, Isaiah 2:2, Isaiah 11:6 etc).
Thanks steveyb3, I appreciate you answering.

Ok - so what about Rev 6:9-10

When he opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of those who had been slain because of the word of God and the testimony they had maintained. They called out in a loud voice, "How long, Sovereign Lord, holy and true, until you judge the inhabitants of the earth and avenge our blood?"

These people who have died clearly remember what happened and what is happening on earth - they know they were slain (martyred) and they know their slayers have not been punished for their crime.
 
God could be manifested in a Trinity if He wanted to. However, this idea is not in the Bible.

Shawn38, the verse is not found in any manuscripts before the third century and so it is rightfully omitted. Why include it? To include the doctrine of the Trinity. As well as this, look at the corruption of John 1 in some translations. …There are many examples of Trinitarian bias in certain translations. Including 1 John 5:7 is one such.
Quick history of
biblelife.org/word.htm

The King James Version and the New King James Version have as their source the Textus Receptus as well as many of the 5,000 Greek Byzantine manuscripts. Essentially, all other modern translations are based on the Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus.

Gnosticism was an esoteric religious movement that flourished and spread to Egypt during the 2nd and 3rd centuries A.D. They presented a major challenge to orthodox Christianity. Most Gnostic sects professed Christianity, but their belief sharply diverged from those of the majority of Christians in the early church. It is believed that the Gnostics butchered the Greek text with these 5,000 changes, which are mostly deletions. The Gnostics can be identified because the deletions match their theology. The Gnostics did not believe:

The virgin birth of Jesus.
That Jesus was the Son of God.
That Jesus was resurrected from the dead.
That Jesus ascended to Heaven.
That Jesus was the Creator.
That Jesus removed the sins of all mankind.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top