The transfiguration was a vision of the Messiah interacting with the Law and the Prophets. Moses and Elijah were not in Heaven then and they are not in Heaven now. If David did not ascend to Heaven, neither did they.
The Saints that walked after Jesus’ resurrection were resurrected for a short space of time and then died again. This supports the Christadelphian view as they were sleeping in the dust of the ground, not residing in Heaven.
At the risk of sounding too biblely…how you like that word…where is that in scripture?
Jesus’ body is a figurative temple. He is not a literal temple made of stones.
That is true, but that is what that verse is talking about…Jesus is talking about Himself.
Yes it was a typo. A very funny one at that!
We are mortal. We need to be made immortal to have fellowship with Yahweh. “The soul that sinneth, it shall die.” “Adam became a living soul.” “The wages of sin is death.” How can something that is immortal need atoning for? Our mortal nature needs atoning for.
*Without intentionally causing offence, the Catholic Church does not use the Old Testament much at all, except for a few bits and bobs. *
This is just false, the Catholic Church teaches and preaches from the Old Testament every weekend, and in most daily masses. My pastor teaches in his homily on the old every time he preaches.
The idea that Mary is worthy of more attention than say, Rahab is a personal interpretation of the Bible.
No it is not, it is in the bible, Luke’s Gospel contains the Canticle of Mary, which is a beautiful song of praise of Mary. “My soul proclaims the greatness of the Lord; my spirit proclaims the greatness of God my Savior…alll ages will call me blessed…”
Isnt that just a little more praise from scripture than Rahab? Letme see, Mother of the Massiah, or prostetute who hid spies (I have to confess I don’t jnow that much about her, but I will)? I’ll take Mary.