I can see you are skilled at moving the goalposts around.And what if…
I can see you are skilled at moving the goalposts around.And what if…
They need to know whether or not they need to use PPE before they get close enough to take a history, and there is a shortage of PPE.They can take a history just as easily as an er doctor.
There is no reason to publish this data among various government agencies.
The goal line is whether or not first responders have any right to know they are responding to the home of a COVID-19 positive person.I can see you are skilled at moving the goalposts around.
So the operator for the call can’t ask and pass that info along?They need to know whether or not they need to use PPE before they get close enough to take a history, and there is a shortage of PPE.
Not even close.The goal line is whether or not first responders have any right to know they are responding to the home of a COVID-19 positive person.
OK, whatever. You don’t think EMS need to be told in advance they’re responding to a COVID-19 call. Sorry, you can not like it all you like; legally, it is a legitimate reason.Not even close.
You may wish to read back on that particular part of the thread.
We are dealing with a whole bunch of previously (and currently) unknown factors here. It is unreasonable to expect that advice and action will not or should not change if knowledge changes.
That is not what was said.OK, whatever. You don’t think EMS need to be told in advance they’re responding to a COVID-19 call.
Correct.We are dealing with a whole bunch of previously (and currently) unknown factors here.
Agreed.It is unreasonable to expect that advice and action will not or should not change if knowledge changes.
I’m not sure that extra knowledge is making it less infectious, less risky or easier to treat. Which is really what we need to know.before restoring things to the way they were.LilyM:
Correct.We are dealing with a whole bunch of previously (and currently) unknown factors here.
New information has been coming out on nearly a daily basis.
Agreed.It is unreasonable to expect that advice and action will not or should not change if knowledge changes.
I expect freedoms we used to enjoy to be back in place as we are learning more about this virus.
Sadly, this is not the case.
You wrote:That is not what was said.
You may again wish to review the posts as you seem to be missing information that has been gone over.
If HIV were transmitted via aerosol, you’d better believe they would tell first responders who had it. Yes, they’d be told where the quarantine houses were. They’re not going to wear PPE on every call as if everyone were in quarantine.It isn’t their business.
If I have an ambulance at my house, I expect they will be using standard precautions.
These should be in place regardless.
Same with police…and fire.
So if they all employee standard precautions for every address, they have no need to know my private health information.
Can you imagine the outcry if they started telling police where AIDS patients live?
True.I’m not sure that extra knowledge is making it less infectious, less risky or easier to treat. Which is really what we need to know.before restoring things to the way they were.
You wrote:
Your efforts towards a straw man are noted.They can take a history just as easily as an er doctor.
There is no reason to publish this data among various government agencies.
‘if’?If HIV were transmitted via aerosol, you’d better believe they would tell first responders who had it.
You do know that it has been demonstrated that HIV is not transmitted via aerosol? Why wouldn’t I say “if”? (You wrote “Can you imagine the outcry if they started telling police where AIDS patients live?” so that is the origin of the hypothesis that HIV would never have been treated this way.)‘if’?
Hypotheses make poor arguments.
And people who have a special concern already opt for Medical ID Bracelets to inform first responders. I like having this option for people but don’t like it broadly accessible in a global database.They can take a history just as easily as an er doctor.
There is no reason to publish this data among various government agencies.