The new Coronovirus, Covid-19 and its spread globally

  • Thread starter Thread starter OurLadyofSorrows
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
They can take a history just as easily as an er doctor.
There is no reason to publish this data among various government agencies.
They need to know whether or not they need to use PPE before they get close enough to take a history, and there is a shortage of PPE.
I can see you are skilled at moving the goalposts around.
The goal line is whether or not first responders have any right to know they are responding to the home of a COVID-19 positive person.

They do have that right, even if someone needing a police or EMS response want to be coy about it.
(What is this “take a history” stuff? The paranoid guy is going to tell them? Sure he will, because he can be depended on to be a “good person”… never mind that maybe he’s turning blue…)
 
Last edited:
Not even close.
You may wish to read back on that particular part of the thread.
OK, whatever. You don’t think EMS need to be told in advance they’re responding to a COVID-19 call. Sorry, you can not like it all you like; legally, it is a legitimate reason.
 
40.png
LilyM:
And what if…
I can see you are skilled at moving the goalposts around.
We are dealing with a whole bunch of previously (and currently) unknown factors here. It is unreasonable to expect that advice and action will not or should not change if knowledge changes.
 
Last edited:
OK, whatever. You don’t think EMS need to be told in advance they’re responding to a COVID-19 call.
That is not what was said.
You may again wish to review the posts as you seem to be missing information that has been gone over.
 
We are dealing with a whole bunch of previously (and currently) unknown factors here.
Correct.
New information has been coming out on nearly a daily basis.
It is unreasonable to expect that advice and action will not or should not change if knowledge changes.
Agreed.
I expect freedoms we used to enjoy to be back in place as we are learning more about this virus.

Sadly, this is not the case.
 
40.png
LilyM:
We are dealing with a whole bunch of previously (and currently) unknown factors here.
Correct.
New information has been coming out on nearly a daily basis.
It is unreasonable to expect that advice and action will not or should not change if knowledge changes.
Agreed.
I expect freedoms we used to enjoy to be back in place as we are learning more about this virus.

Sadly, this is not the case.
I’m not sure that extra knowledge is making it less infectious, less risky or easier to treat. Which is really what we need to know.before restoring things to the way they were.

By the way, we are also learning more about the capablilties - and flaws - of our healthcare systems. Which need to be considered also, and which in some places are not exactly doing well.
 
Last edited:
That is not what was said.
You may again wish to review the posts as you seem to be missing information that has been gone over.
You wrote:
It isn’t their business.
If I have an ambulance at my house, I expect they will be using standard precautions.
These should be in place regardless.
Same with police…and fire.

So if they all employee standard precautions for every address, they have no need to know my private health information.

Can you imagine the outcry if they started telling police where AIDS patients live?
If HIV were transmitted via aerosol, you’d better believe they would tell first responders who had it. Yes, they’d be told where the quarantine houses were. They’re not going to wear PPE on every call as if everyone were in quarantine.
 
Last edited:
I’m not sure that extra knowledge is making it less infectious, less risky or easier to treat. Which is really what we need to know.before restoring things to the way they were.
True.
But the lockdown was put in place when we knew very little. At the time, the most extreme measures were put in place as we had no idea how bad it could be and had to plan out the worst.

We now know better.
There is a reason to maintain distance outside.
But there is no reason to keep people from sitting on a bench at a beach.
There is no reason to keep parks closed.
The is no reason for cerfews to be in place.

Yet the authorities are keeping them in place.
 
‘if’?
Hypotheses make poor arguments.
You do know that it has been demonstrated that HIV is not transmitted via aerosol? Why wouldn’t I say “if”? (You wrote “Can you imagine the outcry if they started telling police where AIDS patients live?” so that is the origin of the hypothesis that HIV would never have been treated this way.)

If you are saying that necessary information might be kept from first responders for political reasons, however, I think you could have a point. I don’t know, but it is possible that you’d be right. It is a reasonable concern, because public health policy is subject to the influence of politics. I won’t try to deny that. Such a failure wouldn’t be because the first responders didn’t feel they had every right to safe work conditions.
 
Last edited:
They can take a history just as easily as an er doctor.
There is no reason to publish this data among various government agencies.
And people who have a special concern already opt for Medical ID Bracelets to inform first responders. I like having this option for people but don’t like it broadly accessible in a global database.
 
worth reading, in layman terms

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top