O
Oliviad
Guest
As for men, even a number of those in Egypt that claim to be against terrorists, and be friends to Coptic Christians, all strongly believe that the kidnappings of Chrisyian girls to provide muslims with wives are justifiable. I was horrified when every single “moderate” forum member on a thread chimed in that they are doing Christian women a favor, saving them from the oppression of husbands in a Religion that doesn’t like divorce. In one instance, they mentioned gleefully kidnapping a Coptic Priest’s wife, then annulling her marriage to her husband, and saying that she would have been with a man all her life who wasn’t a muslim. Then one added that they do the same in Georgia as well.
The islamic women in Egypt dress immodestly by comparison to the Copts they call sluts, but they compliment their immodest tops with silly towels around their heads, as if hiding their ears, while having poorly hid breasts is better than the slutty act of hair visible on a woman modestly attired!
The comments the Pope made about the words of a Byzantine emperor about the violent spread of islam was apt. That emperor, Manuel, had been dealing with a raving sultan who frothed at the mouth to think anyone still lived free of islam! the sultan (or the satan) had already kidnapped the emperor, and forced him to destroy his own final fortress outside of Constantinople. Later, after the emperor escaped, the same sultan invited him and other Christian leaders to a conference, where he surprised them and was about to kill them all! Though that was prevented, all the officials with the emperor were blinded for life, which the sultan had earlier threatened to do to the emperor if he didn’t tear down the defenses at Constantinople. The mistake of allowing muslims to live in the Capital proved fateful later, when a door was left open from within, by which thing the city was finally taken.
The last emperor, whom the sultan dealt with unmercifully and cruelly, was the son of the aforesaid emperor whose words the Pope quoted. When they took the city, they smashed into the Hagia Sophia, killed the elderly and infants in that place, and raped the women and girls, just as muhammad himself had done to females in many situations.
In the hadiths, he is oft represented as riding alongside some follower, having crude sex discussions. Once a man mentioned getting married. He asked whether or not she were a virgin (a young girl). The man answered that he had chosen to marry a widow. the false prophet told him that he should rather have married a virgin, and (remembering when he married the little girl `Ayisha) said that virgins are good for games of grabbing.
It is well attested in the hadiths by many lines of recollection that when he had taken a place, he and his men were actively sorting through their sex objects, and that while the men were busy forcing themselves into crying survivors of murdered familes, the men suddenly wondered whether muhammad would have them impregnate these poor victims, or practice birth control. his answer merely was about birth control, and left those poor women and girls to further endure rape.
the quran mentions, beyond the limit of “wives”, endless women under a muslim’s right hand. There is no set limit on them in the quran, and they were the automatic sex captives from each and every new conquest. though a man owed them none of the wives’ “benefits”, he could have more sex with them than with his wives if he chose. muhammad took full advantage of them in addition to his wives.
the pervert that allowed him to take his little girl, in a veiled threat, was the first of four califs.
The islamic women in Egypt dress immodestly by comparison to the Copts they call sluts, but they compliment their immodest tops with silly towels around their heads, as if hiding their ears, while having poorly hid breasts is better than the slutty act of hair visible on a woman modestly attired!
The comments the Pope made about the words of a Byzantine emperor about the violent spread of islam was apt. That emperor, Manuel, had been dealing with a raving sultan who frothed at the mouth to think anyone still lived free of islam! the sultan (or the satan) had already kidnapped the emperor, and forced him to destroy his own final fortress outside of Constantinople. Later, after the emperor escaped, the same sultan invited him and other Christian leaders to a conference, where he surprised them and was about to kill them all! Though that was prevented, all the officials with the emperor were blinded for life, which the sultan had earlier threatened to do to the emperor if he didn’t tear down the defenses at Constantinople. The mistake of allowing muslims to live in the Capital proved fateful later, when a door was left open from within, by which thing the city was finally taken.
The last emperor, whom the sultan dealt with unmercifully and cruelly, was the son of the aforesaid emperor whose words the Pope quoted. When they took the city, they smashed into the Hagia Sophia, killed the elderly and infants in that place, and raped the women and girls, just as muhammad himself had done to females in many situations.
In the hadiths, he is oft represented as riding alongside some follower, having crude sex discussions. Once a man mentioned getting married. He asked whether or not she were a virgin (a young girl). The man answered that he had chosen to marry a widow. the false prophet told him that he should rather have married a virgin, and (remembering when he married the little girl `Ayisha) said that virgins are good for games of grabbing.
It is well attested in the hadiths by many lines of recollection that when he had taken a place, he and his men were actively sorting through their sex objects, and that while the men were busy forcing themselves into crying survivors of murdered familes, the men suddenly wondered whether muhammad would have them impregnate these poor victims, or practice birth control. his answer merely was about birth control, and left those poor women and girls to further endure rape.
the quran mentions, beyond the limit of “wives”, endless women under a muslim’s right hand. There is no set limit on them in the quran, and they were the automatic sex captives from each and every new conquest. though a man owed them none of the wives’ “benefits”, he could have more sex with them than with his wives if he chose. muhammad took full advantage of them in addition to his wives.
the pervert that allowed him to take his little girl, in a veiled threat, was the first of four califs.
he, like all actual muslims, saw value in using women for sexual enjoyment, which the dead were spared, and in them and children, they saw added numbers to their snowballing community. That was their only reason for sparing some. they had a well orchestrated war plan - otherwise, what were Arabs doing in Spain so soon after the infidel’s death (or for that matter, ever at all?), and how could they take over the Persian empire Rome had never defeated?!