J
Joshua27
Guest
Oh, no! I agree that one’s property is their property. Yes, of course intentional vandelism or destruction is wrong (“do unto others…” & “do not covet your neightbor’s…”). Indeed I’d feel very remorseful and sorrowful because something belonging to that poor person was taken from them…but is it more sorrowful because it was a specific religous relic (religion neutral)? No, I don’t feel so. Was it still valuable to them? Yes, I think so…but then again we aren’t to store-up any treasures here on earth, but in heaven, right?thank you for your response. the Power is in God alone. but he does use the ordinary for extraordinary purposes. this is biblical. what about when the apostle paul was healing people, and the Spirit of God was working so much through him, that even the hankerchiefs people touched enacted a healing? how about the prophets bones in the old testament. when a man fell dead into the prophets grave, and happeded to touch the bones, he came alive again. even if the focus of prayer is destroyed, that does nothing to diminish, what is behind the focus. i dont feel anyones faith would be destroyed. but by the same token, since they are just images, such as a cross or a statue of the Blessed Mother, would it then be alright for someone to intentionally vandelize or destroy these images? would you not feel bad, if someone intentionally vandelized a statue of Mary in some poor old persons front yard? there is a reason why i ask this. peace![]()
A more interesting rhetorical question would be: What if God destroyed all of our statues, paintings and relics (religion neutral) and then returned to heaven (not saying a word)? If God uses the natural, what if a great earthquake swallowed up our relics, would we believe God was “speaking” to us or would we write it off as merely a natural disaster?