A
Anglewannabe
Guest
I watched both links and I honestly don’t understand the message they are trying to give. They are showing a group of people fighting for rights and being attacked in effort to silence them by another group of people. That is how any group got rights. If there were no oponents of the requested rights, then there would not be a need to fight for rights:shrug:
However, OP, your post appears to have a strong implication that women should not have rights because men no longer have them and it is offensive.
I agree that men of sexual abuse and violence deserve a voice. However, you also seem to be sending out a message the way to fix the problem is to take away women’s rights.
As well OP, you have stated that this group of men is a good thing because they are againts abortion. News flash: A lot of men are againts abortion but that does not make them good men. There is nothing noble about a man who could never get pregnant say abortion is wrong. The only time it is noble is when a woman has an unwanted pregnancy and has the baby.
However, OP, your post appears to have a strong implication that women should not have rights because men no longer have them and it is offensive.
I agree that men of sexual abuse and violence deserve a voice. However, you also seem to be sending out a message the way to fix the problem is to take away women’s rights.
As well OP, you have stated that this group of men is a good thing because they are againts abortion. News flash: A lot of men are againts abortion but that does not make them good men. There is nothing noble about a man who could never get pregnant say abortion is wrong. The only time it is noble is when a woman has an unwanted pregnancy and has the baby.