J
justasking4
Guest
You are correct. Nor do any of the writers of the NT.runandsew;2600715]He doesn’t refer to Mary as his queen in the Gospels
But God inspired the authors of the bible to write the following things:
Since the time of Solomon, there didn’t appear a time that the King of Judah didn’t have the queen mother sitting at his right side.
This is mention many times in scripture.
You read in Revelation that a woman appeared in heaven with a crown, among other things that verse refers to (the church, Israel), one of them is Mary.
So let’s put this together. Jesus is the fulfillment of the King of Judah, the King of Judah had his queen mother at his side of the throne, and Jesus is on his throne in heaven, and the book of Revelation mentions that the mother the child, which we would both agree is referring to Jesus,is in heaven with a crown.
The Disciples asked if they could sit at the right side of Jesus in heaven, but Jesus said that it was up to the father to decide who sat there.
Since the NT never uses these passages to say what you are saying you are reading catholic doctrine into these passages. If i’m not mistaken, Mary as queen was unknown not only to the apostles but the entire church for centuries. For such an important as queen to be unknown is mind boggling to say the least.I think Scripture shows who the person that God decided on is.