The Sexual State. How a rolling revolution is destroying Lives

  • Thread starter Thread starter JimG
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Abused wives or husbands should live out their vows if they are fathers and mothers. That doesn’t require maintaining living conditions that make abuse possible. Do that stuff Jim posted. In that and prayer God can use your suffering for the family especially yours.
  • Form a lifelong plan for cooperating with the one person who will co-parent with you. That is the institution formerly known as “marriage.”
  • Only have sex with the person you are married to.
  • married unless someone does something really awful.
  • Don’t attempt a “remarriage.”
  • Be nice to your spouse, so he or she can put up with you.
 
Although that is terrible for those women, the vast majority of divorces do not take place under those circumstances.
 
We reap what we sow. Today’s unprecedented troubles are the illegitimate children of that same sexual revolution. Human nature has not changed one iota. It has simply been granted license to indulge in its lowest forms of behavior.

The Kinks got it right in 1970, in their hit song “Lola”
Girls will be boys, and boys will be girls
It’s a mixed up, muddled up, shook up world…
 
Last edited:
Similar figures are used in Australia by the Domestic Violence industry (where they love to say “one woman per week”).

They use the figure for impact (pun intended), then fudge over that this number is: across all relationships, not just marriages; across all communities (including the aboriginal, where dv rates are 40 times the national average, and other disadvantaged communities), and includes former partners, where violence can escalate in the wake of a separation and parental alienation. The raw figure says almost nothing about violence within marriages and within the white middle class - but that’s where the dv industry plants most of its propaganda, and that’s what they really want to attack (in line with the OP’s post).
 
Last edited:
Extremely rare.
Having not read the rest of this thread here is a stat from Aus, it can’t be that much different in Marlboro country.

One woman a week is murdered and these murders are by their ex or current partners, or a family member or friend

52 woman a year murdered due to domestic violence

It’s a reality platypus!
 
Last edited:
Abused wives or husbands should live out their vows if they are fathers and mothers.
Unfortunately sometimes that is not possible because it will lead to murder or injury.

One should never put themselves or their children at risk by hanging around or interacting with the abuser.
 
And how do you know that the vast majority of marriages that end in divorce didn’t contain abuse
 
40.png
gracepoole:
Nearly every couple we know has divorced.
If I were a gambling man I wouldn’t like those odds and I might not even play that game
Those marriages, by and large, shouldn’t have happened in the first place. Those couples had zero understanding of marriage as a sacrament, never invited God into the relationship, and in most cases rejected Him outright. It’s a recipe for disaster.
 
I’ve heard Catholics say that and similar things like, catholic marriages last. But do they? Don’t Catholics divorce at a similar rate to the population at large?
 
I’ve heard Catholics say that and similar things like, catholic marriages last. But do they? Don’t Catholics divorce at a similar rate to the population at large?
I’ve no idea whether most Catholic value the sacrament involved in their marriages. I can only speak to mine and the divorces I’ve witnessed. And in the latter, folks were ill-formed to marry in the first place and they abandoned their marriages at the first hint of trouble.
 
Starting in 1970, the media has slowly, gradually gotten more sexually perverted. This has resulted in the slow and gradual poisoning of people’s minds. They see it acted out and think, “Hey. That looks OK.” Casual sex with no consequences? No, the CDC is telling us we are going through an STD epidemic. Make divorce too easy and call it “No-Fault Divorce.” Celebrities do it all the time, why can’t everyone? I was driving through a poor black neighborhood and saw a billboard for “Do It Yourself Divorce.” That is an example of promoting divorce.

Wake up everyone. Start with real relationships, ignore the media, and get to know the other person. Find out if you have things in common and go from there. As long as the cart is put before the horse, we’ll have more unhappiness and single moms.
 
Marriage is not easy. Young couples aren’t taught coping skills and about “how to talk it out.” Even in regular friendships, being honest and reconciling after a misunderstanding helps the relationship. And then there are expectations. Couples should talk about what they expect from marriage before the ceremony. I asked one young lady what she expected from marriage. She said: “I want money for clothes, jewelry and trips. And a big house by the water.” That was unrealistic, but I knew another very nice woman who got married, honeymooned in Hawaii and was disappointed. She told me: “Nothing’s changed.” I thought, ‘Like what?’ but didn’t say it. A year later, she was divorced.
 
Marriage is not easy. Young couples aren’t taught coping skills and about “how to talk it out.” Even in regular friendships, being honest and reconciling after a misunderstanding helps the relationship. And then there are expectations. Couples should talk about what they expect from marriage before the ceremony. I asked one young lady what she expected from marriage. She said: “I want money for clothes, jewelry and trips. And a big house by the water.” That was unrealistic, but I knew another very nice woman who got married, honeymooned in Hawaii and was disappointed. She told me: “Nothing’s changed.” I thought, ‘Like what?’ but didn’t say it. A year later, she was divorced.
At least she was honest.

I’m fine with that, just so long as she commits to her own obligations as wife, and she’s not divorcing him in ten years time for “not meeting my emotional needs”, or for “abuse” according to some contrived definition.

I have no problem with the various selfish reasons for marrying (we all have them), so long as they come with reciprocal commitment - “for better or worse, richer or poorer, in sickness and in health, while we both live”.

This relates to the very serious problems highlighted in the OP article.
Question: Which types of victim do you think are the least recognized, even among those critical of today’s sexual culture?
Dr Morse: The victims of the divorce culture are almost completely invisible. I include the abandoned spouses, or reluctantly divorced persons, who would have liked to remain married, but were divorced against their will. Few people realize that under U.S. no-fault divorce law, the government always takes sides with the person who wants the marriage the least.

We do not even ask the questions that would allow us to answer the question: “how many divorces have a reluctant partner?” Since the book went to press, I have found evidence that suggests as many as 70% of divorces may have a “reluctant” partner. But the person who found this was not looking for it. He stumbled over it in the course of looking for something else.

The children of divorce are also socially invisible. They are supposedly “resilient,” but in fact they suffer for a lifetime.
The person who wants the marriage the least (after several years) is usually the one who has benefited from it but has come to demand more, and can also exit at no cost. Eg. she wanted a house and kids, but now wants an intense relationship, or he wanted a wife and home maker, but now wants a gorgeous companion. But, statistically, this is much more often the woman, and in this she is fiercely supported by feminism, the divorce laws and even Christianity.

(“even Christianity”. It is worth noting that Protestantism, with its enabling and encouragement of divorce, is more complicit in spousal desertion than Catholicism is. I have issues with the Catholic church being too sympathetic with feminism, but at least her firm anti-divorce dogma is a bulwark against feminism’s debasement of marriage. A Catholic wife can’t presume on an annulment when she is thinking of leaving.)
 
Last edited:
I met a non-Catholic Christian who recently married. He told me he was committed to do whatever he could to keep his marriage and did not consider divorce an option. However, he did realize that she might divorce him. In that case, he said, he would try to reconcile but if he couldn’t then it would be on her. He would tell her he didn’t want that. I lost contact with him.
Someone else I know got married. He was able to give his wife and her kids a big house and she got the clothes, jewelry and trips. But, after 18 years, he found out she was seeing someone else. He had cause. The lawyers were furious with them because they worked out an agreement. Her lawyer said she could get half of everything, but over the written objections of their lawyers, they were allowed to make the deal and got divorced. Not too much later she married the other guy.

What happened to fairness? What happened to divorce for cause not “irreconcilable differences”? Nobody uses that phrase except for divorce. It’s purposely vague. No-Fault Divorce was created out of thin air.

The Catholic Church has a problem with radical feminism, which has done much to drive women and men apart. Feminist icon, Gloria Steinem, said, “A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.” So, men don’t even have a species relationship with women. The marketing of craziness needs to be exposed as just that.
 
I’ve heard Catholics say that and similar things like, catholic marriages last. But do they? Don’t Catholics divorce at a similar rate to the population at large?
Surprisingly, no and we’re using the ‘once baptised a Catholic, always a Catholic’ approach. And notice it’s even lower with Catholics who attend at least once a week.
 
Casual sex was being had during ww11.
It started way back then.
 
Living out the vows doesn’t require that one makes themselves even more vulnerable to a murderer.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top