0Scarlett_nidiyilii:
The Church doesn’t generally rule on particular medical or psychiatric conditions, but on the morality of various treatments.
It appears that it has yet to rule on the morality of various treatment methods of gender dysphoria. I’ll contact that organisation you mentioned. Although at this point I don’t expect to get a clear answer.
The point of Christian morality is not to delineate every forbidden action with situational specificity.
The foundation of morality is
the good that it points to. You have to first delineate the good. Morality is then the “parameters of” human action and the evaluation of human action,
in reference to that good. Morality is never about prohibitions for the sake of prohibitions. Morality leads to the fullness of life in the spirit (CCC).
Along this line, Christian morality is not a set of theological constructs that are pulled out of the mind of church-people. Morality depends on
sane observation. If human beings cannot take in revelation as it is revealed, morality is nonsensical.
Some basic goods are as follows.
It is good to exist.
Human beings are made in the image of God.
Human sexual differentiation is the unique vehicle by which human existence happens.
Human beings are objectively male and female, so that human beings can be fruitful and multiply.
The human body is unique then, and it has deep meaning and significance that should be respected and revered. The human body and it’s characteristics are not to be treated with malice or indifference.
Question for you:
does the process of sexual surgery in an attempt to treat subjective conditions contribute to these goods above, or does it detract from them?
These are questions
you have to answer in morally evaluating your actions.
Edit: while some of this is strikingly simple, the practical application of morality can be excruciating in everyday life. We all face challenges that are very difficult and we all fall short. Still, God is good and promises us good if we practice fidelity.