The Stunning Biggotry on this Board

  • Thread starter Thread starter IvanKaramozov
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Using link from known anti-Catholic sources, like PBS, does not help your cause. PBS has repeatedly presented incorrect information and has failed to correct it when errors have been pointed out. This very link is a prime example. These false allegations were repudiated prior to his beatification.
query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=940DE2D6123AF935A1575AC0A96E948260
americancatholic.org/Features/SaintOfDay/default.asp?id=1431
catholic-church.org/serra-beth/serra-4.htm

But I am done with you on this subject. You have proved the OP’s point and the title of this thread, however. Thank you for that.
So:

In the NY Times story the Vatican just denies abuse and forced conversions. Catholic-church.org really says nothing about it. But this americancatholic piece is great, basically Native Americans were animals like dogs and should have been grateful for Christian domestication.

Because the Native Americans were living a nonhuman life from the Spanish point of view, the friars were made their legal guardians. The Native Americans were kept at the mission after Baptism lest they be corrupted in their former haunts—a move that has brought cries of “injustice” from some moderns.

How would you like it if atheists thought Catholics were living with barbaric fantasies of Jesus and sought to bring you up to date by destroying your culture and beliefs?

So you failed to show any repudiation of abuses, just whitewash and excuses. Anyone with common sense knows Native Americans endured forced labor and conversion, and had their lands stolen by the white Catholics. Then when Mexico took over California they were dumped by the missions anyway, except they had no land to go back to, it was hijacked by the rich and powerful Christians.

This is all as bad as Holocaust denial.
 
So you failed to show any repudiation of abuses, just whitewash and excuses. Anyone with common sense knows Native Americans endured forced labor and conversion, and had their lands stolen by the white Catholics. Then when Mexico took over California they were dumped by the missions anyway, except they had no land to go back to, it was hijacked by the rich and powerful Christians.

This is all as bad as Holocaust denial.
This is like saying that anyone with common sense knows that global warming will destroy the world. Both are false statements based on deception and half-truths. And the crack about Holocaust denial is as shameful as your appalling lack of historical knowledge. Do you realize that the very religion you are so fervently defending denies the Holocaust? And at the same time they long to repeat it on a worldwide scale.
 
If passions would not inflame the heart we might never seek God. That’s unnatural. Man’s ability to use rational and intelligent reason to control his passions throughout human history is legion for failure. That’s reality.

Another reality is the small percentage of people and governments in the world who are so enlightened to the concept of true human equality despite whatever faith they proclaim as a group or individual. Even with God coming to Earth Himself we find it difficult or quickly act upon the truth we know. How long after Christ died did Paul ride to Damascus and Peter his dream to take the message beyond the Jews?

Even with that, to compare the conventional wisdom of 1000 AD to 2008 AD is almost as irrelevant as comparing China in 1776 and the US the same year. The Civil Rights Act by LBJ was less than 50 years ago so singling out American Indian abuses by the Manifest Destiny driven spirit of the New World explorers is a non-issue.

As a Catholic I would condemn any dehumanizing personal attack for any reason. When discussing ideologies the line drawn between respectfully questioning another’s intelligence with regard to faith and being disrespectful often disappears. The obvious difference between the Moslem reality and Catholic/Christian reality of equality is application.

In most predominately Christian countries but in America especially do the people through government try and redress past wrongs to the point of near stupidity that become hurtful to ourselves. Name another nation that millions of non-citizens sneak into for better than they have with little risk, or allow tax-exempt casinos to the ‘oppressed’ indigenous people. How many want to go to Saudi Arabia or any place conquered by the ideology of Mohammed, and be unable to gamble or have women drive a car or walk alone on the street, or practice a religion other than the state mandated one? What are the equivalent Moslem expressions to the Red Cross or Catholic Charities that give assistance to those in need regardless of faith or need?

When frustrated passions are expressed inappropriately it should be taken into context but not excused. Foul language may not help the message but it shouldn’t dismiss it either. Western Moslems, particularly the non-Sunni/Shiite can deny the significance of certain dogma that is largely practiced by the non-Western Moslems but it doesn’t make it true. Christianity does not have a dhimmi equivalent in either the religious or secular context while Islam has both.

Christianity is centered on God made man whose words are timeless and is the reason we recognize our faults and generally gives us the impetus to effect change for the better such as Women’s Suffrage, minority rights, and outlaws intolerance with respect to race, disability, and even at times intelligence. Only recently have we waged an offensive war much to our collective shame in my view. I think it violates the Christian ideology no matter the reason we have done it though it only goes to show we still have not fully accepted the truth we proclaim to know. However, the personal freedom given to humans by God is largely maintained in Western governments by documents such as our Constitution.

Islam is centered on the actions of a 7th century man whose words are outdated and is the reason a unrepentant and un-admitted intolerance is pressed to be accpepted in the West by adherents of Mohammed largely maintained by documents such as the Pact of Umar. Sometimes it is difficult to be rational in the face of such irrationality. There is a real danger to the Christian ethic in Western society by even the tacit acceptance of Islam to go unchallenged because of its unyielding ideology and history and there are better ways to defend against it.
 
Frankly, I think the non-catholic and apologetics boards are out of control. All that goes on is fighting, circular arguments that get no where, and very unchristian accusations. It’s getting very bad and I mostly try to stay out of these forums because nothing good comes out of them. IMO, the best thing would be to shut them down and stop the fighting for a while.
 
If passions would not inflame the heart we might never seek God. That’s unnatural. Man’s ability to use rational and intelligent reason to control his passions throughout human history is legion for failure. That’s reality.
That’s an interesing point
Another reality is the small percentage of people and governments in the world who are so enlightened to the concept of true human equality despite whatever faith they proclaim as a group or individual. Even with God coming to Earth Himself we find it difficult or quickly act upon the truth we know. How long after Christ died did Paul ride to Damascus and Peter his dream to take the message beyond the Jews?
Alright
Even with that, to compare the conventional wisdom of 1000 AD to 2008 AD is almost as irrelevant as comparing China in 1776 and the US the same year. The Civil Rights Act by LBJ was less than 50 years ago so singling out American Indian abuses by the Manifest Destiny driven spirit of the New World explorers is a non-issue.
Yes and no, when someone brings up the atrocities commited by Muslim nations in the name of Islam it is perfectly fair to bring by atrocities by Christian nations in the name of religion, the point is not some “tit for tat” it is to deflate the exagerated threat posed by Islam and introduce a more mundane mindset, America politics led to the doctrin of mannifest destiney and the religious justifications, like many cases currently in the middle east, the point is that while there are alarming trends and movements in the middle east we have seen these movements, atrocities, and terroristic trends(the first car bomb attack, I beleive, was in America by a radical anarchist group) before, in the early 20th century it was anarchism and marxism, disturbing trends with plenty of blood shed by their violence, but profane, secular, and nothing that could not, when studied rationally, be calmly assesed and analysed and delt with.

When people elevate these disturbing Islamic trends in the middle east into hysterical, sensationalist, armagedon, end time battle between good and evil we loose sight of the simply reality of the situation, the cause of these movement are profane and often based on rather arbitrary things, like boredom(I’m not kidding in the least). Flying off into hysterics is only throwing gasoline on the fire, there are serious problems in the middle east, little girls were burnt alive in Saudi Arabia because the poloice would not allow them out of their school when it was burning because their heads were not covered, there are major, large scale, violent political movements.

All of these things must be taken seriously, however supernaturalising the problem and going off into hysterical accusations about Muslims(whome, according to a poster want to breed like “pigs” and take over Europe) is not going to solve anything, just like killing those two Italian anarchists after a shame trial didn’t do anything.
As a Catholic I would condemn any dehumanizing personal attack for any reason. When discussing ideologies the line drawn between respectfully questioning another’s intelligence with regard to faith and being disrespectful often disappears. The obvious difference between the Moslem reality and Catholic/Christian reality of equality is application.
Alright
In most predominately Christian countries but in America especially do the people through government try and redress past wrongs to the point of near stupidity that become hurtful to ourselves. Name another nation that millions of non-citizens sneak into for better than they have with little risk, or allow tax-exempt casinos to the ‘oppressed’ indigenous people. How many want to go to Saudi Arabia or any place conquered by the ideology of Mohammed, and be unable to gamble or have women drive a car or walk alone on the street, or practice a religion other than the state mandated one? What are the equivalent Moslem expressions to the Red Cross or Catholic Charities that give assistance to those in need regardless of faith or need?
Wait now, and this is what I’m talkign about, your going into retoric and mudding the watters.

Now, you claim that we attempt to redress past wrongs to the near point of stupidity. Now that is simply false, we do not dedicate ourselves to mending the problems caused by our colonialism in South America, South Pacific, Africa, or the Middle East, we do offer slight compensations, allowing a reservation to have a Casino after the people’s land was stolen from them, they were genocidialy eliminted and moved, and relegated to small strips of land which has ashtonishingly high alchoholism, unemployment and suacide rates is not bending over backwards to adress past wrong to the point of stupidity.

There is no flooding into middle eastern countries because they have a stagnant economey and hish unemployment, contrasted to Americas better social mobility and low unemployment, just like asian immigrats flodding into india, Eastern Europeans flooding into Western Europe, Middle Eastern peoples flooding into Europe or North Koreans excapeing to China.

The lack of movement into MIddle Eastern countries has little to nothing to do with Mohammed, he died 1300 years ago, saince then there have been numerous empires in the region, numerous wars and conquests, two world wars, European Colonialism, and reconstruction.

The “red cresent” there are numerous Muslin charaties, look them up.
When frustrated passions are expressed inappropriately it should be taken into context but not excused. Foul language may not help the message but it shouldn’t dismiss it either. Western Moslems, particularly the non-Sunni/Shiite can deny the significance of certain dogma that is largely practiced by the non-Western Moslems but it doesn’t make it true. Christianity does not have a dhimmi equivalent in either the religious or secular context while Islam has both.
I don’t know exactly what you mean here
Christianity is centered on God made man whose words are timeless and is the reason we recognize our faults and generally gives us the impetus to effect change for the better such as Women’s Suffrage, minority rights, and outlaws intolerance with respect to race, disability, and even at times intelligence. Only recently have we waged an offensive war much to our collective shame in my view. I think it violates the Christian ideology no matter the reason we have done it though it only goes to show we still have not fully accepted the truth we proclaim to know. However, the personal freedom given to humans by God is largely maintained in Western governments by documents such as our Constitution.

I don’t see how you can support such strong statements, certianly Christianity has healped reform programs, however it has also been inhibitive.
I

slam is centered on the actions of a 7th century man whose words are outdated and is the reason a unrepentant and un-admitted intolerance is pressed to be accpepted in the West by adherents of Mohammed largely maintained by documents such as the Pact of Umar

. Sometimes it is difficult to be rational in the face of such irrationality. There is a real danger to the Christian ethic in Western society by even the tacit acceptance of Islam to go unchallenged because of its unyielding ideology and history and there are better ways to defend against it.

still all to bundled
 
In response to the OP ~ I have seen more anti-Jewish bigotry on this forum than I have ever witnessed anywhere else in my entire life. It often borders on thinly, sometimes VERY thinly, disguised anti-Semitism.

Some amount of bigotry, sometimes due to simple ignorance or unfamiliarity, is common within any group of people with diverse backgrounds and opinions. While a few posters on this forum seem to blame all Muslims for the atrocities of a few, I’ve seen far more wariness than bigotry.

In contrast, the anti-Jewish bigotry has been stunning. While it’s very likely that those who exhibit such bigotry would strongly object to any suggestion of anti-Semitism, it is often very difficult to give some posters the benefit of the doubt.
 
This is like saying that anyone with common sense knows that global warming will destroy the world. Both are false statements based on deception and half-truths. And the crack about Holocaust denial is as shameful as your appalling lack of historical knowledge. Do you realize that the very religion you are so fervently defending denies the Holocaust? And at the same time they long to repeat it on a worldwide scale.
I’m Native American, I know all about what my ancestors went through, especially on the Trail of Tears being removed from Mississippi. Nothing but lies and broken promises and suffering. It’s all true, no amount of whitewash can cover it.

Jesus clearly said to put away the sword but many Christians completely ignore that and act like they have the right to use violence and treat people badly because Jesus is on their side or something, insanity.

So all we have here is pot kettle black. It’s not so much that I love Islam, I hate a lot of it. But I hate hypocrisy just as much.
 
Jesus clearly said to put away the sword but many Christians completely ignore that and act like they have the right to use violence and treat people badly because Jesus is on their side or something, insanity.

So all we have here is pot kettle black. It’s not so much that I love Islam, I hate a lot of it. But I hate hypocrisy just as much.
lascasas.org/ Here is a man who hated hypocrisy intensely, was a dedicated Catholic, and fought the abuses in Spanish America. One CAN admit that there were abuses by people who claimed to be Catholic, and still remain loyal to the Church.
 
lascasas.org/ Here is a man who hated hypocrisy intensely, was a dedicated Catholic, and fought the abuses in Spanish America. One CAN admit that there were abuses by people who claimed to be Catholic, and still remain loyal to the Church.
I know they can. My problem at the moment is that some people here can’t seem to do the same.
 
Tough to accept that the Catholic Church isn’t perfect. Maybe that is the reason for some of the bigotry. Effective apologetics is tough at times.
 
The Ottoman Empire forbid the printing press, and there is no reasone to think they would have abandoned their economic systems for European ones simplle because the conquored them, generally the opressor/occupier imposes it’s customs on the opressed/occupied.
This is true. The E Orthodox today, for example, have an anti scholasticism bent due to Muslim occupation throughout the East. Bp Ware talks about it in his book under the section Church under Islam.
intratext.com/x/eng0804.htm
 
I’m Native American, I know all about what my ancestors went through, especially on the Trail of Tears being removed from Mississippi. Nothing but lies and broken promises and suffering. It’s all true, no amount of whitewash can cover it.

Jesus clearly said to put away the sword but many Christians completely ignore that and act like they have the right to use violence and treat people badly because Jesus is on their side or something, insanity.

So all we have here is pot kettle black. It’s not so much that I love Islam, I hate a lot of it. But I hate hypocrisy just as much.
Yes history is full of people acting badly. Not meant as an excuse, just recognizing the fact.

But to be balanced, as a native American you know the warts of YOUR ancestry as well, before Christians ever hit the shores of this continent…
 
The lack of movement into MIddle Eastern countries has little to nothing to do with Mohammed, he died 1300 years ago, saince then there have been numerous empires in the region, numerous wars and conquests, two world wars, European Colonialism, and reconstruction
.

Totally and undeniably false. Part of Mohammed’s legacy is a belief-system that is anti-science and anti-intellectual. To consistently blame the problems of Islamic countries on the West when large part of the blame is due cultural inertia is ludicrous.
 
.

Totally and undeniably false. Part of Mohammed’s legacy is a belief-system that is anti-science and anti-intellectual. To consistently blame the problems of Islamic countries on the West when large part of the blame is due cultural inertia is ludicrous.
No, there was a fideist movement in Islam, after a greek, rationalist movement, but that has been a swaying pendulum in Islamic thought.

Afghani led a very influential intelectual reformist movement centered on a return to philosophy and scientific ingenuity, however it was upset by the rising nationalist movements.

I did not blame it fully on the West, I positioned that as one of many factors.
 
Yes history is full of people acting badly. Not meant as an excuse, just recognizing the fact.

But to be balanced, as a native American you know the warts of YOUR ancestry as well, before Christians ever hit the shores of this continent…
Choctaw were peaceful agricultural people before white man came to town.
 
Greetings and peace be with you all;

The same God created people who are Muslims, Catholics atheist Anglicans and Jews. The same God hears all our prayers.

When we harm other people we harm a part of God’s wonderful creation.

In the spirit of praying for peace on Earth

Eric
 
Greetings and peace be with you steve b,
are you saying the Choctaw never had wars with other tribes, before Europeans arrived?
Labels are for parcels and not for people. When we put labels of, Europeans, tribes, Choctaw on people we kind of overlook the obvious fact that we are all created by the same God.

In the spirit of praying for peace on Earth

Eric
 
Greetings and peace be with you steve b,

***Labels ***are for parcels and not for people. When we put labels of, Europeans, tribes, Choctaw on people we kind of overlook the obvious fact that we are all created by the same God.

In the spirit of praying for peace on Earth

Eric
Eric,

Thanks for the greetings and peace. :tiphat: The same in return.

In the spirit of being able to communicate thoughts properly, I would suggest labels are not either/or but both. Otherwise you would be criticizing Jesus for labeling people apostles, disciples, Jews, Gentiles, Pharisees, Scribes, Samaritans, tax collectors, sheep, goats, etc etc etc,. which He did throughout the Gospels.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top