The two major differences between Catholicism and Protestantism

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eucharisted
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
That’s cool. If you want to know where Calvin said what he said so that you can look it up for yourself, that’s it. If not, then stop wasting CAF’s precious bandwidth.
:whistle:
And lying doesn’t help your defense of Catholicism.
What you are saying is that you looked up the quote of Calvin from his commentaries. Yeah Right. What would you call that but a lie but that is o.k. anything to discredit a Catholic. I understand why you want it to be dropped. So not to embarrass you any further the subject is dropped. Unless of course you pursue it.
 
Repeat the same thing over and over is still not a LINK. This is where it originally came from however, it is not a LINK to a WEBSITE. The claim you made is you GOOGLED it. You still have not provided the WEBSITE that you retrieved the information from. You know the one you found in 15 seconds. I wonder why:confused: :rolleyes:
Adrift, I think it’s a dead issue now. It seems that the mods got tired of his particular style of “evangelism” (declaring all those who disagreed with him “liars”). So let’s just say a couple prayers for him and move on. 👍
 
The difference between catholicism and protestantism is this:

One is being led by the Holy Spirit, the other is being led by a source moving in the general direction of the Holy Spirit.

This is my honest opinion. We get to the same place, but using different means of getting there. Catholics take the more direct approach.

😃

Blessings,

HC
 
The difference between catholicism and protestantism is this:

One is being led by the Holy Spirit, the other is being led by a source moving in the general direction of the Holy Spirit.

This is my honest opinion. We get to the same place, but using different means of getting there. Catholics take the more direct approach.

😃

Blessings,

HC
Protestants believe that we are being led by the Holy Spirit according to the written Word of God. We know God the Holy Spirit cannot contradict Himself according to God-breathed revelation (Scriptures).
 
Protestants believe that we are being led by the Holy Spirit according to the written Word of God. We know God the Holy Spirit cannot contradict Himself according to God-breathed revelation (Scriptures).
Right. But yet, Calvin and Luther (for example) disagreed strongly on many issues, like what the nature of the Lord’s Supper was, or ought to be. The Anglicans required bishops, while the Anabaptists forbade them. Calvin wrote that anyone guided by the Holy Spirit would inwardly be positive of the contents of Scripture:
“Let it therefore be held as fixed that those who are inwardly taught by the Holy Spirit acquiesce implicitly in Scripture; that Scripture carrying its own evidence along with it, deigns not to submit to proofs and arguments, but owes the full conviction with which we ought to receive it to the testimony of the Spirit. Enlightened by him, we no longer believe, either on our own judgment or that of others, that the Scriptures are from God; but, in a way superior to human judgment, feel perfectly assured - as much so as if we beheld the divine image visibly impressed on it - that it came to us, by the instrumentality of men, from the very mouth of God.” -Institutes, 1.7.5
Luther wrote that he was unsure of the canonicity of James:
About this book of the Revelation of John, I leave everyone free to hold his own opinions. I would not have anyone bound to my opinion or judgment. I say what I feel. I miss more than one thing in this book, and it makes me consider it to be neither apostolic nor prophetic.
And Joseph Smith used Calvin’s argument to successfully jumpstart Mormonism:
Moroni 10:4-5 And when ye shall receive these things, I would exhort you that ye would ask God, the Eternal Father, in the name of Christ, if these things are not true; and if ye shall ask with a sincere heart, with real intent, having faith in Christ, he will manifest the truth of it unto you, by the power of the Holy Ghost. And by the power of the Holy Ghost ye may know the truth of all things.
When you leave religion to the whims of the people and the warm fuzzy feeling that they think might be the Holy Spirit guiding them, it’s a disaster. Even when they have something objective to go off of - Holy Scripture - we muck it up terribly. First of all, as exhibited above, we can’t even agree what IS and IS NOT Holy Scripture, and nowhere in Scripture are we told. But even when two groups of Protestants agree on the contents of the Bible, it doesn’t promise that they agree on anything else. Without the sort of structural unity found in the early Church (and in the modern Catholic Church), you get doctrinal chaos every single time.
 
Right. But yet, Calvin and Luther (for example) disagreed strongly on many issues, like what the nature of the Lord’s Supper was, or ought to be. The Anglicans required bishops, while the Anabaptists forbade them. Calvin wrote that anyone guided by the Holy Spirit would inwardly be positive of the contents of Scripture:

Luther wrote that he was unsure of the canonicity of James:

And Joseph Smith used Calvin’s argument to successfully jumpstart Mormonism:

When you leave religion to the whims of the people and the warm fuzzy feeling that they think might be the Holy Spirit guiding them, it’s a disaster. Even when they have something objective to go off of - Holy Scripture - we muck it up terribly. First of all, as exhibited above, we can’t even agree what IS and IS NOT Holy Scripture, and nowhere in Scripture are we told. But even when two groups of Protestants agree on the contents of the Bible, it doesn’t promise that they agree on anything else. Without the sort of structural unity found in the early Church (and in the modern Catholic Church), you get doctrinal chaos every single time.
Sure, like the Apostle Paul we all know in part. God is an infinte God and we are not. I don’t believe any church knows all truth on this side of glory. Please consider joining us on the Christian Ecumenical Thread.

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=375284
 
Protestants believe that we are being led by the Holy Spirit according to the written Word of God. We know God the Holy Spirit cannot contradict Himself according to God-breathed revelation (Scriptures).
I agree, but who is giving you the written Word? Did you just stumble upon it one day and open it up and read it? That would mean you are leading yourself. Did you go to church and find it there? That would mean you are being led by your church.

Either way, we are all being led. The Scriptures cannot jump into your head or enter by osmosis. 🙂

This biggest question is who’s leading?
 
Protestants believe that we are being led by the Holy Spirit according to the written Word of God. We know God the Holy Spirit cannot contradict Himself according to God-breathed revelation (Scriptures).
This is simply a wish of those who are ignorant of what is authentically of Christ, and nothing more. Christ never promised the Holy Spirit to lead those who just pick up and read the Scriptures. There were not even NT Scriptures for many years after Christ ascended back to Heaven. Christ did promise the Holy Spirit to the Apostles and the Apostolic Church Christ built, to keep the gates of Hell from prevailing against this one Church. Our Lord made this promise to no one else outside the Church. This is why the gates of Hell have prevailed against all ecclesial communities which teach error in faith and morals outside the Catholic Church.

So, why do you put words in Christ’s mouth? This is sinful, and a grave disrespect for our Lord, pride and arrogance by those who claim Christ made a promise that He really never did.
 
This is simply a wish of those who are ignorant of what is authentically of Christ, and nothing more. Christ never promised the Holy Spirit to lead those who just pick up and read the Scriptures. There were not even NT Scriptures for many years after Christ ascended back to Heaven. Christ did promise the Holy Spirit to the Apostles and the Apostolic Church Christ built to keep the gates of Hell from prevailing against this one Church and made this promise to no one else outside the Church. This is why the gates of Hell have prevailed against all ecclesial communities which teach error in faith and morals outside the Catholic Church.

Why do you put words in Christ’s mouth? This is sinful, and a grave disrespect for our Lord, pride and arrogance by those who claim Christ made a promise that He really never did.
Being led to read the Word, and being infallibly gifted to interpret the Word are not the same thing. I think we are all being led to *read *God’s Word.

This is a statement made by most all Protestants that is nowhere in Scripture. Protestants tend to bend and twist God’s Word to mean or to say things that simply are not there.

Sad.

Blessings,

HC
 
Sure, like the Apostle Paul we all know in part. God is an infinte God and we are not. I don’t believe any church knows all truth on this side of glory. Please consider joining us on the Christian Ecumenical Thread.

forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=375284
In a sense, it’s true that there are things unknowable to man. Even Christ Himself in human form was unaware of the day or the hour of the Second Coming (Mark 13:32). But there is a set of knowable Truths, those things which we are both (a) capable of knowing, and (b) intended to know. I think that everyone, regardless of creed, fundamentally agrees upon these things. We can’t know everything, but there are some things which we really ought to know (and other things we ought to let alone).

It is this set of knowable truths which Christ entrusts to the Church via the Holy Spirit in John 14. He says:
**John 14:26 **The Advocate, the Holy Spirit that the Father will send in My name–He will teach you everything and remind you of all that I told you.
**John 14:16-17 **And I will ask the Father, and he will give you another Advocate to be with you always, the Spirit of truth, which the world cannot accept, because it neither sees nor knows it. But you know it, because it remains with you, and will be in you.
So, from this, we learn that the Holy Spirit will entrust to “you” (plural) the full “Deposit of Faith,” the entirity of that knowledge which we’re intended to have for salvation, and that HE will preserve this forever.

So how do we understand this you-plural? It can’t be the individual. No individual has the full knowledge of even the deposit of Faith. There’s a reason that God inspired different Apostles to write different parts of the Truth, rather than entrusting it to one person. But also, no individual lives forever, so this idea that the Holy Spirit will remain with you forever makes little sense if He means it to the individual.

The second option is that He means the mass of individuals independently… that is, that parts of the whole Truth will be given to each person. This is a stronger interpretation than the first, but it’s clearly incomplete. Because if each book of the Bible remains separate, and each Apostle worked independently, it would create disunity, rather than unity. And what good is it to have the whole Truth if you can’t find it? To just know that “the Truth is out there,” but that it eludes those seeking it isn’t very helpful.

More specifically, this is often the Protestant interpretation of the above passages, but I don’t think it holds historical muster. They deny, for example, the Real Presence - that the bread and wine substantially and sacramentally become the Body and Blood of Jesus Christ. When they take this view, they’re forced to say that all of known Christendom was wrong for over a thousand years. If that’s true, if something like a “Global Apostasy” occurred, then the Holy Spirit didn’t preserve His Truth amongst individuals, because the Spirit of Truth wasn’t known to anyone in the Church (or rather, there was no more Church), and He wasn’t teaching them these fundamental things. I’m oversimplifying a bit here, but my point is that you can’t simultaneously claim that: in all times and all ages, the Holy Spirit will ensure that someone in the Church has the right answer, while simultaneously holding that one certain issues (Real Presence, perhaps double predestination, the necessity of clergy, the regenerative nature of Baptism), *no one *was right prior to 1517 (or whenever).

The third option is that He means the Church… that these individuals in union with one another will have an essentially identifiable Deposit of Faith. So if there are questions on anything for which an answer is needed, it can be found in the Church. This is, of course, the Catholic view. This view makes the most sense of the Scriptures. We collectively, in the Church, have the right answers. We individually may not, but we know where to look.
 
Being led to read the Word, and being infallibly gifted to interpret the Word are not the same thing. I think we are all being led to *read *God’s Word.

This is a statement made by most all Protestants that is nowhere in Scripture. Protestants tend to bend and twist God’s Word to mean or to say things that simply are not there.

Sad.

Blessings,

HC
Happily,
One can even be led to God without ever reading any of the Scriptures, as was evident with the early Christians and for hundreds of years due to massive illiteracy in the population.

God’s truth is taught by God through His Catholic Church. Anyone interpreting differently will not get to the same place as we do. Those who twist our Catholic Scriptures to their own destruction, will not arrive at the truth of Christ.

It is indeed very sad. I am more displeased with the ones who mislead. I am very sad for those who unkowingly are misled by Protestantism. Protestantism has brought the decay of western civilization by moral relativism, where there is no objective truth, but everyone decides for themselves what “their truth” is. Indeed more than just sad. It’s tragic for the individuals and for society.
 
I agree, but who is giving you the written Word? Did you just stumble upon it one day and open it up and read it? That would mean you are leading yourself. Did you go to church and find it there? That would mean you are being led by your church.

Either way, we are all being led. The Scriptures cannot jump into your head or enter by osmosis. 🙂

This biggest question is who’s leading?
Scripture is God-breathed, therefore God gave us His written revelation. Oh I absolutely agree, the Bible is a closed book for those without the Spirit of God ( 1 Cor 2). God the Holy Spirit must illuminate scripture truth which changes us. There is a consistency of the work of the Spirit in Scripture illumination throughout redemptive history. God gave us Apostle, Evangelist, teachers, etc (Ephesians 4) to mature us in the Faith. That’s why I read books from various generations. The church is universal… and I do read books by Augustine to understand truth.
 
Happily,
One can even be led to God without ever reading any of the Scriptures, as was evident with the early Christians and for hundreds of years due to massive illiteracy in the population.

God’s truth is taught by God through His Catholic Church. Anyone interpreting differently will not get to the same place as we do. Those who twist our Catholic Scriptures to their own destruction, will not arrive at the truth of Christ.

It is indeed very sad. I am more displeased with the ones who mislead. I am very sad for those who unkowingly are misled by Protestantism. Protestantism has brought the decay of western civilization by moral relativism, where there is no objective truth, but everyone decides for themselves what “their truth” is. Indeed more than just sad. It’s tragic for the individuals and for society.
Amen.

But God is great and His Truth will prevail.

😃
 
Okay, when Jesus spoke these words, was He referring to the New Testament or the Old Testament Scriptures? 😉 . Therefore, the OT is about Jesus Christ. Protestantism is older because a historic Protestant knows that redemptive history began before the foundation of the world which by the grace of God alone, he becomes part of God’s story of redemption upon faith in Christ.

John 5:39
You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is they that bear witness about me,
Gabriel of 12;

When Jesus spoke these words the only scriptures existing was the Pentateuch and the Septuagint not the New Testament. This scripture you used is out of context for the topic you raised. I believe the one that best fits your analogy comes from;

Luke 24:27
Then beginning with Moses and all the prophets, he interpreted to them what referred to him in all the scriptures.

If your Protestantism believes in redemptive history since the fall of the first Adam called into effect by the first protoevangelium from Gen.3:15… You are not alone, both Jews, and Catholics are in agreement of God’s redemptive plan of humanity.

What is questionable is your claim that your Protestant faith was before the foundation of the World? Catholics are not in disagreement that this pertains to Jesus not a Church or religious affiliation.

If I could introduce to you another major difference between Catholics and your Protestantism is that Catholics have the True “Real” presence of Jesus Christ when Jesus is present to his Catholic Church (bride) in his True body, blood, soul and divinity. Where by it appears by your commentary that you have a symbolic Jesus that is believed in not seen.

You see this is the will of the father; John 6:40
For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him may have eternal life, and I shall raise him (on) the last day."

The major difference here is that Catholics see Jesus with all of our human senses including the Holy Spirit. Where your Protestantism “only” believes? Please do not mistaken my comment as a negative to your Protestant belief’s, Iam only introducing another major difference between the TRUE presence of Jesus Christ and a symbolic Jesus.

I would welcome correction or clarifications of this difference.

Peace be with you
 
Amen.

But God is great and His Truth will prevail.

😃
It will prevail, indeed the battle has already been won.

For us, the greatest of God’s creation, we must choose whether to listen to His truth as taught fully only in the Catholic Church, or reject it in favor of our own. The answer to that question may determine where you spend eternity.
 
What is the spiritual battle from a Catholic perspective? I see a spiritual battle between the kingdom of darkness and the kingdom of light. Some seem to think the battle is between Protestants and Catholics… so it appears on this thread.

Finally, be strong in the Lord and in the strength of his might. Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the schemes of the devil. For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places. - Chief sinner Apostle Paul
 
Gabriel of 12;

When Jesus spoke these words the only scriptures existing was the Pentateuch and the Septuagint not the New Testament. This scripture you used is out of context for the topic you raised. I believe the one that best fits your analogy comes from;

Luke 24:27
Then beginning with Moses and all the prophets, he interpreted to them what referred to him in all the scriptures.

If your Protestantism believes in redemptive history since the fall of the first Adam called into effect by the first protoevangelium from Gen.3:15… You are not alone, both Jews, and Catholics are in agreement of God’s redemptive plan of humanity.

What is questionable is your claim that your Protestant faith was before the foundation of the World? Catholics are not in disagreement that this pertains to Jesus not a Church or religious affiliation.

If I could introduce to you another major difference between Catholics and your Protestantism is that Catholics have the True “Real” presence of Jesus Christ when Jesus is present to his Catholic Church (bride) in his True body, blood, soul and divinity. Where by it appears by your commentary that you have a symbolic Jesus that is believed in not seen.

You see this is the will of the father; John 6:40
For this is the will of my Father, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in him may have eternal life, and I shall raise him (on) the last day."

The major difference here is that Catholics see Jesus with all of our human senses including the Holy Spirit. Where your Protestantism “only” believes? Please do not mistaken my comment as a negative to your Protestant belief’s, Iam only introducing another major difference between the TRUE presence of Jesus Christ and a symbolic Jesus.

I would welcome correction or clarifications of this difference.

Peace be with you
I personally would not divide over the issue of communion, for it is the Lord’s Table where all true Christians partake. I don’t think any particular Christian community has a monopoly in what He has provided as a means of grace for his children in regards to the sacraments of baptism and communion. It seems prideful to boast that your particular sacrament is superior to my Christian communities sacrament. Think about it, the Catholic Church acknowledges all Triune baptisms as being completely valid in uniting sinners to Christ, even though Protestants do not see baptism as the means of regeneration.
 
What is the spiritual battle from a Catholic perspective? I see a spiritual battle between the kingdom of darkness and the kingdom of light. Some seem to think the battle is between Protestants and Catholics… so it appears on this thread.

Finally, be strong in the Lord and in the strength of his might. Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the schemes of the devil. For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the cosmic powers over this present darkness, against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places. - Chief sinner Apostle Paul
Well said. I’m in full agreement that we should staunchly oppose error in all of its forms, but speaking of non-Catholic Christians like they’re intentionally assaulting the Way, the Truth, and the Life is going way too far.
 
2nd Adam: I really do not see your logic in proving that Protestantism is older than Catholicism. We, as Protestants, share a common history with Catholics up to the point of the Protestant Reformation. I’m not denying God’s eternal plan for salvation and reconciliation.

Regarding your reference to redemption by the grace of God alone or salvation by faith alone; what Scriptures are you using to support this belief?

In Christ,
Anna
. . . . .I think the best Scripture to support grace alone through the instrument of faith by the person and work of Christ alone would be the entire books of Romans, Galatians, Ephesians, John, etc. 🙂 . Those united to Christ worship the God of Abraham, Issac and Jacob, right?
2nd Adam: Your answer is somewhat evasive. You failed to consider Scriptures in Hebrews, James, 2 Peter, and 1 John.

It is very clear that we are not saved by faith/grace alone. Works must accompany faith. That does not mean that we are able to “earn our salvation”; but we must consider the N.T. as a whole–actually the Bible as a whole.

The N.T. tells us that Abraham was justified by works. See **James 2:21-22 (ESV): **21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he offered up his son Isaac on the altar? 22 You see that faith was active along with his works, and faith was completed by his works;

John 5:25-29 (NASB):
25 "Truly, truly, I say to you, an hour is coming and now is, when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who hear will live.
26 "For just as the Father has life in Himself, even so He gave to the Son also to have life in Himself;
27 and He gave Him authority to execute judgment, because He is the Son of Man.
28 "Do not marvel at this; for an hour is coming, in which all who are in the tombs will hear His voice,
29 and will come forth; those who did the good deeds to a resurrection of life, those who committed the evil deeds to a resurrection of judgment.

Hebrews 6:4-6 (NIV):
4 It is impossible
for those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, who have shared in the Holy Spirit,
5 who have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the coming age,
6 if they fall away, to be brought back to repentance, because to their loss they are crucifying the Son of God all over again and subjecting him to public disgrace.

Hebrews 12:14-16 (NIV):
14 Make every effort to live in peace with all men and to be holy; without holiness no one will see the Lord.
15 See to it that no one misses the grace of God and that no bitter root grows up to cause trouble and defile many.
16 See that no one is sexually immoral, or is godless like Esau, who for a single meal sold his inheritance rights as the oldest son.

James 2:14-18(ESV):
14 What good is it, my brothers, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can that faith save him?

15 If a brother or sister is poorly clothed and lacking in daily food,
16 and one of you says to them, “Go in peace, be warmed and filled,” without giving them the things needed for the body, what good is that?
17 So also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead.
18 But someone will say, “You have faith and I have works.” Show me your faith apart from your works, and I will show you my faith by my works.
Footnotes: a. James 2:16 Or benefit

**James 2:21-26 (ESV):
21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he offered up his son Isaac on the altar?
22 You see that faith was active along with his works, and faith was completed by his works;
23 and the Scripture was fulfilled that says, “Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness”—and he was called a friend of God.
24 You see that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone.
25 And in the same way was not also Rahab the prostitute justified by works when she received the messengers and sent them out by another way?
26 For as the body apart from the spirit is dead, so also faith apart from works is dead.
**
2 Peter 3:16-18 (NIV):
16 He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction.
17 Therefore, dear friends, since you already know this, be on your guard so that you may not be carried away by the error of lawless men and fall from your secure position. 18 But grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and forever! Amen.

1 John 2:4-6 (NIV):
4 The man who says, “I know him,” but does not do what he commands is a liar, and the truth is not in him.

5 But if anyone obeys his word, God’s love is truly made complete in him. This is how we know we are in him:
6 Whoever claims to live in him must walk as Jesus did.

I am a Protestant Christian, too. It’s just that we have to move beyond the Sunday Sermons and Lessons that cite only selected Scripture.

I would urge you to prayerfully read the Bible cover-to-cover, and also study Church history. Be brave enough to read books by authors outside your Denomination.

In Christ,
Anna
 
2nd Adam: Your answer is somewhat evasive. You failed to consider Scriptures in Hebrews, James, 2 Peter, and 1 John.

It is very clear that we are not saved by faith/grace alone. Works must accompany faith. That does not mean that we are able to “earn our salvation”; but we must consider the N.T. as a whole–actually the Bible as a whole.

The N.T. tells us that Abraham was justified by works. See **James 2:21-22 (ESV): **21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he offered up his son Isaac on the altar? 22 You see that faith was active along with his works, and faith was completed by his works;

John 5:25-29 (NASB):
25 "Truly, truly, I say to you, an hour is coming and now is, when the dead will hear the voice of the Son of God, and those who hear will live.
26 "For just as the Father has life in Himself, even so He gave to the Son also to have life in Himself;
27 and He gave Him authority to execute judgment, because He is the Son of Man.
28 "Do not marvel at this; for an hour is coming, in which all who are in the tombs will hear His voice,
29 and will come forth; those who did the good deeds to a resurrection of life, those who committed the evil deeds to a resurrection of judgment.

Hebrews 6:4-6 (NIV):
4 It is impossible
for those who have once been enlightened, who have tasted the heavenly gift, who have shared in the Holy Spirit,
5 who have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the coming age,
6 if they fall away, to be brought back to repentance, because to their loss they are crucifying the Son of God all over again and subjecting him to public disgrace.

Hebrews 12:14-16 (NIV):
14 Make every effort to live in peace with all men and to be holy; without holiness no one will see the Lord.
15 See to it that no one misses the grace of God and that no bitter root grows up to cause trouble and defile many.
16 See that no one is sexually immoral, or is godless like Esau, who for a single meal sold his inheritance rights as the oldest son.

James 2:14-18(ESV):
14 What good is it, my brothers, if someone says he has faith but does not have works? Can that faith save him?

15 If a brother or sister is poorly clothed and lacking in daily food,
16 and one of you says to them, “Go in peace, be warmed and filled,” without giving them the things needed for the body, what good is that?
17 So also faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead.
18 But someone will say, “You have faith and I have works.” Show me your faith apart from your works, and I will show you my faith by my works.
Footnotes: a. James 2:16 Or benefit

James 2:21-26 (ESV):
21 Was not Abraham our father justified by works
when he offered up his son Isaac on the altar?
22 You see that faith was active along with his works, and faith was completed by his works;
23 and the Scripture was fulfilled that says, “Abraham believed God, and it was counted to him as righteousness”—and he was called a friend of God.
24 You see that a person is justified by works and not by faith alone.
25 And in the same way was not also Rahab the prostitute justified by works when she received the messengers and sent them out by another way?
26 For as the body apart from the spirit is dead, so also faith apart from works is dead.

2 Peter 3:16-18 (NIV):
16 He writes the same way in all his letters, speaking in them of these matters. His letters contain some things that are hard to understand, which ignorant and unstable people distort, as they do the other Scriptures, to their own destruction.
17 Therefore, dear friends, since you already know this, be on your guard so that you may not be carried away by the error of lawless men and fall from your secure position. 18 But grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. To him be glory both now and forever! Amen.

1 John 2:4-6 (NIV):
4 The man who says, “I know him,” but does not do what he commands is a liar, and the truth is not in him.

5 But if anyone obeys his word, God’s love is truly made complete in him. This is how we know we are in him:
6 Whoever claims to live in him must walk as Jesus did.

I am a Protestant Christian, too. It’s just that we have to move beyond the Sunday Sermons and Lessons that cite only selected Scripture.

I would urge you to prayerfully read the Bible cover-to-cover, and also study Church history. Be brave enough to read books by authors outside your Denomination.

In Christ,
Anna
I think your theological positons have moved you outside the historic Protestant camp and maybe into the Catholic camp in regards to theology. It’s okay, because the real division is in our union with either Adam or the 2nd Adam. Sure, I don’t mind considering all of the NT books including James, Hebrews, Peter, etc. Paul and James are equally true in what they write. We know it is impossible for God to lie. It is impossible for Him to contradict Himself. These are only apparent contradictions or paradoxes, but I have no problems discussing these things in the light of all of Scripture. I truly believe the best systematic theology is Reformed theology.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top