G
GiftofMercy
Guest
We are adoring Christ when the host and the Chalice are raised. We look and adore.
Then you missed the point of the bells being rung. They ring so that everyone knows to look up at the host and then at the chalice.That never happened. When the Host was raised we bowed our heads.
Latin wasn’t a always a “dead language.” For a long time it was actually spoken & even after it wasn’t commonly spoken, texts in universities were still in Latin. So I think for a long time people / a portion of the Faithful did not find Latin unfamiliar at all. They didn’t have or need a missal to follow along in English.So, just wondering, if people didn’t understand the liturgy because it was in Latin, how did Christendom get built? In the past despite the Mass in Latin, people knew enough to build parishes and Cathedrals and Catholic hospitals and preach the gospels and become missionaries and be martyred for the faith, but they didn’t understand the language?
Just wondering.
My mother grew up pre-Vatican II, and she remembered those things, too.I also have first-hand knowledge of people saying the rosary, walking around praying the Stations or devotions to Saints. Many men just hung out on the front steps smoking and talking until the bells rang.
I can’t imagine all that change in such a short time! Just curious: how did that feel to you as a child, esp one learning the organ?I was 10 in 1966, and in the school year 1966-1967, even then an aspiring student of the organ, I was allowed to play by the Sister who directed the all-girls school choir, made up of students from grades 5-8, in our parish school. That year we sang the Mass settings in Latin.
The following year, in 1967-1968, the organ was still used and we sang the Mass settings but with English words instead.
The following year, in 1968-1969, the choir came down from the loft, the organ was no longer in use, and the choir members went to the left hand side and stood on the bottom step/shelf in front of the church, where in the middle the new ‘free standing altar’ with the priest ‘facing the people’ stood. Instead of the Gregorian chant Mass settings we now had a ‘4 hymn sandwich’ including things like “Joy is Like the Rain”, “Michael Row the Boat Ashore”, “Shout from the Highest Mountain”, and “Sons of God”, while we were ‘accompanied’ by a sister with a guitar and 2-3 other boys and girls who were learning. Guitars seemed to breed overnight. The sisters as well as the older (he was probably all of 30) man and the two 30-something women who played the organ for weddings and funerals disappeared, but there were plenty of guitar players! And this was in the (still beautiful to me even now) city of Philadelphia. . .
That still happens at large parishes and was approved by Pope John Paul II in Misercordei Dei in 2002:When I grew up in the 1950’s before Vatican II, confessions were often heard at various parishes during Mass.
The St Joseph Continuous Sunday Missal was designed not to keep flipping back and forth. However I never really got a chance to use it as the Mass was being changed. Things got really confusing during the transition period in the 60’s.It was difficult to follow along with our missals
Why would it be ironic that a session of a Council of the Catholic Church was preceded by the then-current Mass? What is now referred to as the Ordinary Form wasn’t promulgated until some years after the Council ended.The ironic thing was that each session of the council was preceded with the old Latin Mass, the very Mass they felt they outgrew.
There were immediate changes in 1964, one of them being the communion formula itself.What is now referred to as the Ordinary Form wasn’t promulgated until some years after the Council ended.
The good friar didn’t say that.I however don’t agree on a number of things. I enjoy both forms. I think to say people who go to the Extraordinary Form of mass are not participating is wrong