The way people dress to Mass

  • Thread starter Thread starter francisca
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Does the ALL CAPS mean you are shouting at me?

Does your insistence on this point mean you see no difference in the presence of Christ in Catholic and Protestant churches
 
Does the ALL CAPS mean you are shouting at me?

Does your insistence on this point mean you see no difference in the presence of Christ in Catholic and Protestant churches
I clearly said that there is a difference in the presence between Catholic and Protestant Churches. (Yeas I was shouting because you obviously were not getting my point, which, I may add, is the teaching of the Church.) Because the Protestants do not have the Eucharist, does NOT mean that Jesus is nowhere to be found in their assemblies, as you seem to imply. When we refer to the “real presence” in the Eucharist, it does not mean that the other presences of Christ are not real, but that it is real as opposed to a symbol.
 
I think a dress code should be required… which would be modest clothing. If you wear something that you would be offended if someone touch your bear skin, then don’t wear it. This includes low cut blouses, short shorts, flip-flops. You’d be amazed at the clothes worn at some of the poorest parishes, in the Bronx. They dress light years better than wealthy parishes. Modesty does not have to be expensive. Think about those around you and are you being a distraction, by your dress. In the end, you can explain to God why you wore what you wore to the Most Holy of all Sacrifices… and it’s too hot outside or I didn’t have time for laundry isn’t going to be a good excuse.
yes, a dress code should deal with Modesty. As the mother of teenage sons I find it must be very distracting for them to be sitting behind a healthy young girl in tight or overly revealing clothes.
 
Is it charitable to shout?

My point is we have the Real Presence - a higher level of Divinity among us. If the Protestants can get dressed up for an inferior level then shame on us for taking His Real Presence so casually. We have the true Church, the one created by Jesus Himself. They have, to quote Pope Benedict XVI,“ecclesial communities” yet show more respect to God and one another.
 
Recently I discovered how little I know about the Roman rite. At this point in time I do not have the resources to study other rites. I do not wish to debate or learn about the Eastern rites therefore I will not engage or contribute to that forum. Does this not seem reasonable?
 
Is it charitable to shout?

My point is we have the Real Presence - a higher level of Divinity among us. If the Protestants can get dressed up for an inferior level then shame on us for taking His Real Presence so casually. We have the true Church, the one created by Jesus Himself. They have, to quote Pope Benedict XVI,“ecclesial communities” yet show more respect to God and one another.
This is your mistake. The Real Presence is not higher it is different. Jesus is present in the assembly, in the person of the priest, in the reading of the Word, and on the altar. Remember that the Eucharist is not an end to itself. Adoration, benediction, etc are good things, but adoration is not why we were given the Eucharist. We were given the Eucharist to receive His Body, Blood, Soul, and Divinity. Jesus did not say “take and adore” he said “take and eat.” It is a disservice to our Lord and the Church He founded to limit His presence to only a single manifestation.
 
If I understand your position, you are saying there is nothing qualitatively different between the Catholic Church and the Protestants. God is present in both places. We don’t need to show anymore respect to the Real Presence in a Catholic church than we would when two or more are gathered in a Protestant. Is that it?

Is this the traditional Catholic position you are presenting?
 
My church has adequate heat, along with the other churches I’ve visited. There’s also plenty of coat racks. People just don’t utilize them and would rather keep them on during service, this way they can just leave right after they take communion. Very rude!:mad:

It’s one thing if your church is ice cold and that’s how it is-- but when your church has modern conveniences of good heat and coat racks, take coats off. JMO.
I’m sure that not everyone wearing a coat leaves right after taking Communion. There are a lot of reasons for leaving your coat on if you are comfortable. I wouldn’t want to try and negotiate a coat rack with 300 other parishioners. Sometimes I leave valuables in my pockets and would rather not risk losing them by taking a coat on or off. Or risk having my coat go home with someone else by accident. Yes, that happened to me once. Fortunately we are close knit parish and I was able to get my coat back. And my church does have a coat rack in the back.
 
If I understand your position, you are saying there is nothing qualitatively different between the Catholic Church and the Protestants. God is present in both places. We don’t need to show anymore respect to the Real Presence in a Catholic church than we would when two or more are gathered in a Protestant. Is that it?

Is this the traditional Catholic position you are presenting?
You are misrepresenting everything I say. I even looked up my notes on the Eucharist from my Sacraments class. What I presented is authentic Catholic teaching. Your misrepresentations of what I posted are not.
 
You are misrepresenting everything I say. I even looked up my notes on the Eucharist from my Sacraments class. What I presented is authentic Catholic teaching. Your misrepresentations of what I posted are not.
Then clarify your position and list authorative sources to your position. I am not intending to misrepresent you in any manner. My point that you challenge is that as we have the Real Presence in our churches and Protestants do not we should at least show the same amount of respect in our attire. Why you feel the need to debate this is beyond me. Don’t we bother have better things to be doing right now?
 
Then clarify your position and list authorative sources to your position. I am not intending to misrepresent you in any manner. My point that you challenge is that as we have the Real Presence in our churches and Protestants do not we should at least show the same amount of respect in our attire. Why you feel the need to debate this is beyond me. Don’t we bother have better things to be doing right now?
You are the one that is flogging this expired equine.
 
(Yeas I was shouting because you obviously were not getting my point, which, I may add, is the teaching of the Church.)
Code:
 It is not a teaching of the Catholic Church to shout at people who do not understand some convoluted point. I sense you are becoming angry.
“Be angry and sin not” Ephesians 4:26
 
It is not a teaching of the Catholic Church to shout at people who do not understand some convoluted point. I sense you are becoming angry.

“Be angry and sin not” Ephesians 4:26
Thank you.

The reason I signed up here was because the website is called “Catholic Answers” and I have questions. I put a couple questions in the Liturgy and Sacraments forum and one in the Apologetics as after reading the forum titles I felt they were most appropriate there. I also have questions regarding the Latin Mass which is why I’m looking here. So far there isn’t much opportunity to get answers as some people seem more inclined to argument. Perhaps someone should start a “Cathoic Debate” website and ya’ll can have it out there.
 
Mary couldn’t afford opulence.
While this is true enough, the article makes mention only of coverage. For example one could have a dress with this coverage that costs some certain price at Wal-Mart. (Forgive me, I am not in the habit of pricing dresses :)) One could also go to a high-end clothing store, find an article that provides the same coverage, but costs several hundred dollars. I think we need to keep this in mid. And the same goes for menswear. I have two dress jackets, both were bough at Men’s Warehouse (on sale no less!). I am content with these. I cannot justify spending a huge sum of money on say a Hugo Bass dress coat that alone costs twice as much as my two put together. On the one hand, if one is overly label conscious, it could be seen as a form of idolatry, and on the other spending too much money on clothing can be seen as poor stewardship. My point is modesty has two facets: coverage and frugality.
 
Yes, of course you are right. One shouldn’t dress modestly by wearing something so extravagent that takes attention away from Jesus and the liturgy. Perhaps it should also be pointed out that the dress shouldn’t have any satanic images on it.

We should always do our best for God. On the Sabbath, we should make an effort to show Him respect in our attire. That doesn’t mean your attire has to be at some minimum expense to exclude the poor or those with limited cash flow. It’s the effort that counts. Is this the traditional perspective?
 
Yes, of course you are right. One shouldn’t dress modestly by wearing something so extravagent that takes attention away from Jesus and the liturgy. Perhaps it should also be pointed out that the dress shouldn’t have any satanic images on it.

We should always do our best for God. On the Sabbath, we should make an effort to show Him respect in our attire. That doesn’t mean your attire has to be at some minimum expense to exclude the poor or those with limited cash flow. It’s the effort that counts. Is this the traditional perspective?
That is the way I understand it. I generally wear a jacket and tie to Mass on Sundays. Daily Mass for me is a bit different because I have classes the rest of the week. I think something that will change people’s attitudes is we have to get away from the idea that Mass is something we “go to.” In reality, Mass is participation in an eternal event in which we receive the Creator of the universe.
 
St. Thomas More, may I ask you a couple questions?

Are you in the seminary?

Do you consider yourself a Traditional Catholic such as this forum would describe it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top