Jesus gave them full authority before He ascended to His Father as He said He was and He will come back as the Angels said He would. Your opinion is based on a lie and has no weight Jesus left Peter in charge. Jesus did not desert His Church as you seem to claim. He sent the Holy Spirit to be with us always.
And, He also left His Real Presence in the Blessed Sacrament, hence keeping His promise “Lo, I shall be with you always, even unto the end of the world.”
Jesus never started a church. What he started was called the Sect of the Nazarenes, a Jewish sect, which never had anything to do with Christianity. That dialogue with Peter was a much later interpolation by the Church with the purpose to document Christianity.
You must be talking about the Christ of Paul, because the real Jesus of Nazareth, at the end of his life, went the way of all flesh and rests in the grave. This that he resurrected and ascended into Heaven was made up by Paul about 30 years after Jesus was gone. That’s what I have come to
Benedictgal, give Reason a chance and understand that Jesus, for being an observant Jew and not a Christian, it would be highly improper to entrust his mother into the care of a male disciple, and vice-versa, that disciple into the care of his mother.
HiJesus never started a church. What he started was called the Sect of the Nazarenes, a Jewish sect, which never had anything to do with Christianity. That dialogue with Peter was a much later interpolation by the Church with the purpose to document Christianity.Ben:
HiBenedictgal, give Reason a chance and understand that Jesus, for being an observant Jew and not a Christian, it would be highly improper to entrust his mother into the care of a male disciple, and vice-versa, that disciple into the care of his mother.
John was not there; and even if he had been, the two Mary’s were there at the foot of the cross and Jesus entrusted them to each other. This is one more evidence that Jesus’ beloved disciple was Mary Magdalene and not John. You even throw mud at Jesus’ reputation by insisting on this nonsense. Have mercy for Heaven’s
sake, and be reasonable for once in your life!
Ben:
It is you who post nonsense. A woman depended on her male relatives. Improper? It is just you saying that it would be. Base it on some fact that we can verify not your opinion. You state there is more evidence but that is all the evidence you provide just postings without backing. Do you know the definition of reasonable? I wonder because you don’t produce any evidence of it.Benedictgal, give Reason a chance and understand that Jesus, for being an observant Jew and not a Christian, it would be highly improper to entrust his mother into the care of a male disciple, and vice-versa, that disciple into the care of his mother.
John was not there; and even if he had been, the two Mary’s were there at the foot of the cross and Jesus entrusted them to each other. This is one more evidence that Jesus’ beloved disciple was Mary Magdalene and not John. You even throw mud at Jesus’ reputation by insisting on this nonsense. Have mercy for Heaven’s
sake, and be reasonable for once in your life!
Ben:
Ben, could you please explain the difference between the life of King David and Mohammad?
This just gets better and better - so Jesus referred His mother to Mary Madgalene and said about her ‘Woman, behold your SON’???Benedictgal, give Reason a chance and understand that Jesus, for being an observant Jew and not a Christian, it would be highly improper to entrust his mother into the care of a male disciple, and vice-versa, that disciple into the care of his mother.
John was not there; and even if he had been, the two Mary’s were there at the foot of the cross and Jesus entrusted them to each other. This is one more evidence that Jesus’ beloved disciple was Mary Magdalene and not John. You even throw mud at Jesus’ reputation by insisting on this nonsense. Have mercy for Heaven’s
sake, and be reasonable for once in your life!
Ben:
You must be talking about the Christ of Paul, because the real Jesus of Nazareth, at the end of his life, went the way of all flesh and rests in the grave. This that he resurrected and ascended into Heaven was made up by Paul about 30 years after Jesus was gone.
That’s what I have come to understand from the NT and haven’t found anyone to persuade me of the contrary. Since my views are not hewned in stone, I can change my mind if what you have to say makes sense to me.
Ben:
Hi
I think you ar right. Jesus escaped death from the Cross and when recovered from the injuries of the Cross; he went with Mary and other loyal friends to spread the gospel among the lost 10 tribes of Israel settled in India and the neighboring countries.
He must have also married in Afghans and Kashmiries; as is allowed in the Jews to marry more than one wives.
Jesus died peacefully and respectfully a natural death among his own Jewish people and is buried in Mohallah Khanyar, Sirinagar, India.
I love Jesus and Mary
Thanks
Matthew wasn’t an eyewitness, John was. Matthew doesn’t mention Jesus’ mother either. The absence of being mentioned is not proof that they were not there. That John says they were is.
The Romans were experts and knew what they were doing. Can you produce anyone other than Jesus who escaped the cross by fooling the soldiers that they were dead. Crucifixion was fatal.
PaarSurrey, all this stuff and nonsense about Jesus buried in Kashmir, where did you read it? You never mention your sources. When and by whom was the fiction written? It is fiction conveniently invented to suit the Jesus as mentioned in the Quran, although the Quran does NOT say anything about the many wives of Jesus or his trip to Kashmir. So where did you read this fiction? And who invented it? Hindus have another version of the same fiction, that Jesus went to Kashmir between the ages of 12 and 30, because the NT does not mention anything about His life. (Jesus lived an ordinary life and everybody knew Him as the carpenter Joseph’s son when He started preaching at age 30. Ever heard of villagers in Israel not knowing about someone from their village making a long trip to an exotic and far away land like India?) They just fill that gap with a fiction of their own and try to “prove” that Jesus could have acquired His wisdom only from India and Jesus studied at the feet of Hindu gurus to become a spiritually enlightened man. There must be other fictions of similar variety out there too because silence gives people the opportunity to fill with their own wild imagination to suit their own agendas.
Two items just for your information: First, Paul never saw Jesus. And second, read Acts 11:26. It was with Paul that Christianity started about 30 yers after Jesus had been gone. Your own Bible says, that it was with Paul that his followers started being called Christians. Why? Because Paul would preachThanks for showing the fallacious opinion on what Jesus would have said according to some man 600 years later who never met Him.
Apparently Muhammad changed what Jesus said. After all - HE NEVER MET HIM.
But this is not much different than all the other gnostic tales about Him.
Paul didn’t create Christianity - who makes these things up? Seriously?
HiTwo items just for your information: First, Paul never saw Jesus. And second, read Acts 11:26. It was with Paul that Christianity started about 30 yers after Jesus had been gone. Your own Bible says, that it was with Paul that his followers started being called Christians. Why? Because Paul would preach
that Jesus was Christ. Now, you can see, if faith allows you to, when the idea that Jesus was the Messiah originated, and who was responsible for it.
Ben:
