S
swariffin
Guest
Any Jewish record saying Mary M was Jesus’ wife?We are not talking about Mary, the mother of Jesus but about Mary Magdalene, his wife. I don’t see where and why you had to make the change.
Ben:![]()
Any Jewish record saying Mary M was Jesus’ wife?We are not talking about Mary, the mother of Jesus but about Mary Magdalene, his wife. I don’t see where and why you had to make the change.
Ben:![]()
Perhaps he was either very cheap, or running out of money or just upset with those freeloaders taking advantage of free wine to get drunk at Jesus’ expenses. But congratulations! I can see you are thinking. Keep the good work and you still mightI’m thinking, If Jesus was the groom and thereby responsible for the wine, why did he ask, “What does this have to do with me, woman?”
Whom did Jesus say “woman”? Did he say it to his mother Mary? Please make it clear because it is a derogatory remark to address the mother as “woman.” Jesus said a similar thing when he was on the cross too. He addressed his mother as “woman.”I’m thinking, If Jesus was the groom and thereby responsible for the wine, why did he ask, “What does this have to do with me, woman?”
Jesus told his mother who then told him there was no more wine, he said "What does this have to do with thee? Not me. Christ was concerned why his mother was so worried.I’m thinking, If Jesus was the groom and thereby responsible for the wine, why did he ask, “What does this have to do with me, woman?”
For your information and not that it makes it right, but the Catholic church still has the LOWEST molestation rate than any other church. REFORMATION.COM will explain to you what your church and others are doing. Don’t think that this is a “Catholic” thing my friend, it is going on right in your own church.Well… at least you are honest.![]()
John chapter 2"Jesus could have addressed Mary magd as “woman” but not his own mother, according to my opinion.
Mikvah. A ritual used for purification.Baptism is not the tradition of the Jews. Where do you get that.
The percentage of Jews like me with the mission to reclaim Jesus as one of our own is less than .1 percent. Jews in general don’t give a damn about who was Jesus or Mary Magdalene. They even prefer that he didn’t exist. I don’t blame them but Christians themselves for the cruelties done against them in the name of Jesus when this never had anything to do with Christians. I don’t even try to look for such records, because I’ll be rediculed by my own People. I prefer to explore the NT for all the evidences I need to coroborate the fact that Mary Magdalene was indeed Jesus’ wife.Any Jewish record saying Mary M was Jesus’ wife?
Your entire thesis falls apart here, because that is a false assumption.If Jesus cannot be a Rabbi without being married
Yes, thanks. But please explain the verse 4 because I cannot understand it fully. What did Jesus mean to say about the “concern” and “my hour…”?John chapter 2"
3 When the wine ran short, the mother of Jesus said to him, “They have no wine.”
4 (And) Jesus said to her, “Woman, how does your concern affect me? My hour has not yet come.”
I assumed anyone who was discussing John chapter 2 would first read it. May I politely suggest you do so now before making further comment.
Ginger
a) Both of those lists of laws are things created by Rabbinical Judaism;Jews have 613 commandments. Catholics have only seven Noahite laws.
a) The problem with that theory, is that the evidence suggests that Thomas had the Gospel of Matthew with him, when he went to India. That event can be dated to 52 AD.the first gospel came about in the year 85 CE according to the Saint Joseph Catholic edition of the New American Bible.
Where is the evidence to support your hypothesis that he was a Nazarene?And second, because Thomas was a Nazarene,
Only for those who point blank refuse to construct timelines based upon the datable events that are described in the Bible.That’s pure hogwash.
Paul was very effective at popularising a religion. He didn’t found it. Furthermore, he popularised it, after he decided to be an adherent.One does not found a religion to persecute the adepts. (Acts 11:26)
You’ve obviously never constructed a time line of both Paul and Jesus, and rectified them against events that can be dated by other sources.Regarding being Paul a witness to the crucifixion, is poppy-cock.
I guess Paul found the fountain of youth, considering he was in his late thirties or early forties, when Jesus was crucified.Paul was a boy perhaps 5 years old in Tarsus of Cilicia, a Greek city, playing with little baby gods.
The Gospel of Thomas.Now where do you get that story of twin brother
You should take your own advice then.Sometimes it helps to think.
Ben:![]()
Except for the little issue that the third (or fourth?) moist popular theory in academia is that Mary of Magdala was the author of The Gospel of John. Nobody in academia considers that Lazarus wrote it.So, most likely it was Lazarus who wrote this book.
It can be inferred from the writings of Paul, John, and the synoptic Gospels.so is the explicit statement that he was NOT married missing.
Rabbinical Judaism = Judaism. And the list is compiled from the Torah.a) Both of those lists of laws are things created by Rabbinical Judaism;
b) Karaite Judaism rejects both lists, on the grounds that the lists require one to reject the Torah;
c) If you bothered studying the New Testament, you 'd know that there were 418 explicit commandments in it. Those are commandments that Catholics have to adhere to.
jonathon
Your experience is roughly two millennia later, at a place roughly 500 klicks distant. Furthermore, it is of a theology and doctrine that is arguably different from that of Judaism at that point in time.As you know already from my self-experience, the Bridegroom is the one in charge to provide the wine for the guests.
Are you serious? What is it you want to know?… please explain the verse 4 because I cannot understand it fully. What did Jesus mean to say about the “concern” and “my hour…”?
Popular theory also says that:Except for the little issue that the third (or fourth?) moist popular theory in academia is that Mary of Magdala was the author of The Gospel of John. Nobody in academia considers that Lazarus wrote it.
To counter those that claim it could not have been her, because of the usage of the masculine form, that is explained as being the result of a redaction to lend credence to attributing it to John.
jonathon