A
Arizona_Mike
Guest
.Well, you didn’t just say that, did you? You said that “there’s a reason so many atheists seem angry and nasty…” and you prefixed it (and therefore inextricably linked it) with a sentence that repeats the old theistic guff that atheists must have desperately hollow existences without a deity to worship.
So, my friend, the accusation stands. Quod erat demonstrandum, you might say
Again, this was not an ad hominem argument. It was just something you find distasteful.
I don’t like when people point out a logical fallacy on the Internet and then condescendingly refer them to a Wikipedia article on that fallacy, so I won’t do that to you. But clearly, this was not ad hominem.
(But even if it were, ad hominem arguments can still be correct, even if improperly supported…)
I’d suggest you read Camus, Nitezsche, or Sartre, for starters.And in your reading experience of atheistic tomes, do you come away with the idea that they’re all depressed, introverted types just waiting for death to release them from their miserable existences? If so, then perhaps you could furnish me with the names of these books, for I’ve yet to read one that gives that impression in the slightest.
Even Dawkins, who tends toward Positivism, can be pretty grim:
Just a regular Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm, no?Dawkins: In the universe of blind physical forces and genetic replication, some people are going to get hurt, and other people are going to get lucky; and you won’t find any rhyme or reason to it, nor any justice. The universe we observe has precisely the properties we should expect if there is at the bottom, no design, no purpose, no evil and no good. Nothing but blind pitiless indifference. DNA neither knows nor cares. DNA just is, and we dance to its music.
Relieved to hear it.Maybe you’re reflecting: because the realisation that your God doesn’t exist would fill you with sadness, you assume that atheists must also feel the same? Just a thought. All I know is that no atheist books that I’ve read have had any kind of negative emotional effect on me. Quite the contrary, in fact.