R
Roseeurekacross
Guest
au.finance.yahoo.com/news/russian-military-jet-flew-over-121102582.html
Take back the Rainbow for God
Take back the Rainbow for God
So Iâm not concerned, nothing suspect or sinister in it.The flyby, however, was completely legal and in accordance with the 1992 Treaty on Open Skies, which lets countries that are part of the agreement to surveil the other member countries from the air, Politico reported, citing the State Department.
In the last 15 years, the US and Russia have done this a combined 165 times, Politico said.
âThe missions happen on a semi-routine basis,â a Pentagon official told Politico. âThey usually come in and they list out what locations they want to fly over ⌠We put together the flight plan and with a few exceptions â safety-wise or weather-wise â they are allowed to fly over pretty much the entire territory.â
Amen.Take back the Rainbow for God ������
Iâm confused. If Russiaâs meddling in the U.S. election was unjust, as you stated, then why are you annoyed about the sanctions?snip
Iâm more annoyed about the sanctions on Russia over supposed âmeddlingâ (in what way?) in the USA election, which is unjust.
snip
There is a new thread today in which a writer for a liberal magazine deeply questions whether the Russians hacked the DNC at all.Iâm more annoyed about the sanctions on Russia over supposed âmeddlingâ (in what way?) in the USA election, which is unjust.
How so? Hacking the DNC and hacking the election are similar, yet not exactly the same.There is a new thread today in which a writer for a liberal magazine deeply questions whether the Russians hacked the DNC at all.
If the Russians didnât, then this country is acting in an incredibly foolish way with the sanctions.
Itâs all fun and games, until someone loses an eye. :blackeye:The US has meddled in the elections of so many countries and now they complain about Russia meddling in theirâs.![]()
I, for one, am still not persuaded that the Russians hacked either one. Maybe one of these times definitive evidence will come to light, but so far it has just been conclusions.How so? Hacking the DNC and hacking the election are similar, yet not exactly the same.
I never stated it was unjust because it depends what one means by âmeddlingâ, the point is, what kind of âmeddlingâ are we talking about? this is treated with silence.Iâm confused. If Russiaâs meddling in the U.S. election was unjust, as you stated, then why are you annoyed about the sanctions?
I agree, and they have no proof. Thatâs why these sanctions over supposed âmeddlingâ are totally unjust.There is a new thread today in which a writer for a liberal magazine deeply questions whether the Russians hacked the DNC at all.
If the Russians didnât, then this country is acting in an incredibly foolish way with the sanctions.
bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-06-13/russian-breach-of-39-states-threatens-future-u-s-electionsI, for one, am still not persuaded that the Russians hacked either one. Maybe one of these times definitive evidence will come to light, but so far it has just been conclusions.
I do not know what slogans and what kind of sexual orientation the author supports, but the fact that Russia is annexing the territories of other sovereign states, interferes as a world policeman by military means in the conflict of other states,terrorizes neighborsâ by threats , all these completely discredits Putinâs Russia.What am I missing? What does âtake the rainbow back for Godâ mean and how does it relate to a routine intelligence gathering exercise?
ETA: I partially get it, it looks like an anti-gay thing (A Christian Org Is Trying to âTake Back the Rainbow,â and the Internet Is Snickering). What does this have to do with the story though. The only thing I can figure is that Russia is anti-gay and something![]()