Thread on Liberal Attacks on Trump

  • Thread starter Thread starter Thorolfr
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
T

Thorolfr

Guest
From today’s Guardian:
Randal Pinkett’s first day in the Trump Organization was one he would never forget. Summoned to the offices in Trump Tower, the billionaire’s garish midtown skyscraper, Pinkett entered the room as Trump thumbed through a stack of the day’s newspapers and magazines.
It was 2005, and having just won season four of The Apprentice, the only African American to do so in the show’s history, Pinkett expected Trump’s attention. But as the two spoke about his hard-won contract with the company, it was clear Trump really only cared about one thing: himself.
He broke off from the conversation intermittently, pulling a paper from the pile, carefully scanning each page with a yellow Post-It note stuck to it and disregarding the rest – an aide had already combed through the publications to mark out every article that mentioned the boss. This was his morning routine.
“I think that just speaks volumes,” Pinkett said in an interview. “Donald loves Donald.
“His identity is wrapped around being a winner. If you challenge him, or if he’s put into a losing position, now you begin to take Donald out of his comfort zone.”
In interviews with 12 former employees of Donald Trump, the frontrunner for the Republican presidential nomination and now one of the most controversial figures in modern American politics, none disagreed with Pinkett’s frank assessment of his former boss’s inflated sense of self.
“I don’t think it’s possible to quantify the size of his ego,” said Barbara Res, a former Trump Organization executive vice-president throughout the 1980s. “It’s too big.”
theguardian.com/us-news/2016/mar/14/donald-trump-former-employee-interviews-ego-diversity
 
So he has no low self esteem issues? Never would have guessed…wow. :eek:
 
I’m generally not one to defend Trump from criticism; but I do find it strange that on Friday everybody was calling “There are two different Donald Trumps” an endorsement, yet today people are calling “Donald loves Donald” a criticism. Surely it would be worse to say “There are two different Donald Trumps and they hate each other.”

🤷
 
If protesters and the GOPe want to stop Trump, they need to support Cruz. This playing delegate footsie that Kasich/Romney/Rubio are playing will not work nor will charging the Trump stage. In fact, expect the opposite effect.
 
Yet today, President Obama, is the most egotistical man to hold the office.

It’s getting old all the Trump bashing. If the GOP isnt going to make an effort to undnerstand why Trump has such a draw, then the GOP is finished.

It’s not due to anger, it’s due to the GOP lying to its base for the last 30 years. It’s due to the fact the GOP claims to be for the middle class while at the same time creating laws that allow the importation of cheap labor or the exportation of jobs to cheap labor countries.

Middle class America is tired of being taken advantage of. Middle america is tired of being told its the problem in america. Middle class america is tired of not have a pay raise since 1970.
 
Yet today, President Obama, is the most egotistical man to hold the office.

It’s getting old all the Trump bashing. If the GOP isnt going to make an effort to undnerstand why Trump has such a draw, then the GOP is finished.

It’s not due to anger, it’s due to the GOP lying to its base for the last 30 years. It’s due to the fact the GOP claims to be for the middle class while at the same time creating laws that allow the importation of cheap labor or the exportation of jobs to cheap labor countries.

Middle class America is tired of being taken advantage of. Middle america is tired of being told its the problem in america. Middle class america is tired of not have a pay raise since 1970.
Say it again, Philip!
 
Does this do anything other than reinforce already held opinions of the man?

Hearing that someone who is running for president has an ego should be of no surprise to anyone.

What is surprising, at least to me, is this notion that we’re somehow supposed to be voting to make someone a Saint, and that all contrary information disqualifies someone from our consideration.

I’m sorry, but at this level especially, there *are *no perfect candidates, and we *are *stuck voting for the least of various evils.

A Trump vs. Clinton November absolutely, positively should mean that any pro-life voter holds their nose and votes for Trump, ego or not.
 
Does this do anything other than reinforce already held opinions of the man?

Hearing that someone who is running for president has an ego should be of no surprise to anyone.

What is surprising, at least to me, is this notion that we’re somehow supposed to be voting to make someone a Saint, and that all contrary information disqualifies someone from our consideration.

I’m sorry, but at this level especially, there *are *no perfect candidates, and we *are *stuck voting for the least of various evils.

A Trump vs. Clinton November absolutely, positively should mean that any pro-life voter holds their nose and votes for Trump, ego or not.
I still think Trump is a wolf in sheep’s clothing and he really scares me. Because of his overgrown ego, he will not work well with anyone that doesn’t agree with him but most importantly foreign leaders. God Bless, Memaw
 
I still think Trump is a wolf in sheep’s clothing and he really scares me. Because of his overgrown ego, he will not work well with anyone that doesn’t agree with him but most importantly foreign leaders. God Bless, Memaw
I agree, Memaw, but except for one point, I don’t think he has sheep’s clothing. 😉
 
I still think Trump is a wolf in sheep’s clothing and he really scares me. Because of his overgrown ego, he will not work well with anyone that doesn’t agree with him but most importantly foreign leaders. God Bless, Memaw
You don’t experience the success Trump has had by not being able to work well with others. It’s the same reason I bristle when people say someone like Bill Gates has autism. The skill set for running a multinational corporation requires being able to work well with others and consider their needs and desires.
 
A Trump vs. Clinton November absolutely, positively should mean that any pro-life voter holds their nose and votes for Trump, ego or not.
This is a view I once held. I even practiced it to some extent in the last cycle, but at least then, it started feeling disingenuous. At this point I know longer hold this view. I have seen no clear evidence, other than the person saying so, that the front runner in the GOP even cares about the issue of life. Certainly not to the extent that he would make an issue of it with any one. In fact, he HAS divulged that he supports all the “good work” that Planned Parenthood does, (except the abortions), and sees no reason why we would need to defund PP. I believe he may have had a change of heart regarding life in the sense of of abortion, but only two of his competitors hold it as such a strong value that we might honestly expect something to be done in either congress or the court during their presidency. Even at that, the real work of the pro-life movement, I have come to believe is to change hearts. Not mans laws. If we can accomplish both, then great. Politically, I’d look farther down the ticket. Look at your Representative to the house, and your Senator race, (if you’re having one). If the only choice left to me as a voter is the current GOP front runner, and the current DEM front runner, then I find no sin in opting out of a vote in that one contest, so as not to participate with evil in any way. I would still go vote. I would vote on all my local issues, and for all the local offices on the ballot, and perhaps write in a candidate that I would actually support for the President spot, (which is just one thing on the ballot). In this one scenario, I have absolutely zero faith that the GOP front runner would be any less evil than the DEM front runner and would not be in favor of a presidency for either of them. We must follow our conscience. It is in the catechism. It is a prime point of philosophy and theology. It is where the voice of God speaks to us. If to you that voice says you have to vote for president, then frankly, you must. If mine tells me that I should not, then just as frankly, I must not. Otherwise we are allowing our pride and desires to override our God given conscience. You must be in obedience to your conscience which should be in obedience to God. That’s basically all I’m saying. For some that means to vote for the lesser of two evils. (I even feel that way in some circumstances, within my own conscience…just not in this one particular possible, and likely matchup). For some that will mean to just not vote, or do a write in for that one particular office on this one particular ballot.

I am saying, and I believe through prayer and meditation, that we are no better in the hands of a GOP administration headed by the current front runner, than we are with an administration headed by the front runner of the DEM party at this point. For perhaps the first time, for me, there is no option better than another. There is no holding my nose on anything. I will simply put God first in my life, as I already do, and live through either administration that the country chooses for itself. I will pray each day for our leaders, as I already do. I will pray each day for life, and a change of hearts, as I already do. And my conscience will be clear that I didn’t help either demagogue rise to power to destroy our nation through either fascism or tyranny. I’ll continue to render unto Caesar what is Caesars and to God what is Gods. I will be equally unhappy as a citizen with either leader, but that part is nothing new. I have been unhappy on the citizen front since 1988 at least.

If it makes “must vote” folks any happier…in every other possible matchup this go around, I would vote for the GOP candidate. Just not the most likely scenario that we all see coming.

May God bless and have mercy on us all. Whatever we decide as a people.
 
I agree, Memaw, but except for one point, I don’t think he has sheep’s clothing. 😉
Extending the analogy, I think the best description would be: a wolf wearing a wolf costume.

Side question. Can anyone here remind me who said “I could stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose voters.”?
 
I still think Trump is a wolf in sheep’s clothing and he really scares me. Because of his overgrown ego, he will not work well with anyone that doesn’t agree with him but most importantly foreign leaders. God Bless, Memaw
I don’t think he has any clothing on at all. I’m wondering when his supporters will notice.
 
I don’t think he has any clothing on at all. I’m wondering when his supporters will notice.
We will notice when he is beaten in the election. If he loses then the people will have rejected him. Otherwise we will cheer him on to win back the country from all talk no action politicians.
 
CHICAGO — Leaders of more than 20 leading liberal groups supporting both Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders are set to release a scathing letter on Tuesday that serves as a progressive call to arms against Donald Trump, imploring Americans to undertake a unified set of concrete steps to oppose the Republican front-runner — from protesting to organizing large-scale voter turnout efforts.

“This is a five-alarm fire for our democracy. A hate-peddling bigot who openly incites violence is the likely presidential nominee of one of our nation’s two major parties. It is alarming and dangerous. Donald Trump’s candidacy is a threat to the America we love, and we must respond to him and what he is stoking as such,” reads the letter, which was obtained first by POLITICO. It is signed by top officials of Sanders-backing groups like MoveOn.org and Clinton-backing organizations including the Service Employees International Union.

Read more: politico.com/story/2016/03/top-liberal-leaders-call-for-massive-anti-trump-campaign-220760#ixzz42zUcAFzw
 
I don’t think he has any clothing on at all.
That’s a good analogy too. If H.C. Anderson were living today, I bet he would tell us of “The Wolf Emperor’s New Wool”.
I’m wondering when his supporters will notice.
I don’t know, but I hope and pray that they will do so this month rather than waiting for the general election.
 
Trump too easily fuels some of the Left’s self-righteousness in their disdain for things conservative. Trumpean style is fatally short-sighted, and gains made under President Trump will be short-lived.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top