Three Positive Signs for Obama's Re-Election Chances

  • Thread starter Thread starter irishpatrick
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Obama is THE CURSE of the American people. A racist, anti-American raised by communists who wants to destroy the Christian ideals of our country. Now attending Christian churches to promote his lie of being a Christian to increase his chances of being re-elected. Using God to his own embellishment! The American people should look to the failure of socialism/communism in the world and reject this idiots ideals. VOTE HIM OUT OF OFFICE !
 
And how is it that an informed catholic has no idea of what is done to help women in this manner?

There are Crisis Pregnancy Centers in every major city … they pay extra for listings in the phone book under the tital Abortion Alternatives so that they are present when a pregnant woman seeks for an aboriton provider … something the abortion providers have attempted to fight [its not informed consent or equal opportunity they seek but the abortion $$'s - big industry :eek:] … Crisis pregnancy centers will help women pre and post birth of their child … health care assistance, infant care needs - diapers, furniture, parenting classes, rent assistance, food assistance, keep the child or adoption …

Every state has a Right to Life organization [as well as the National one] … .they provide all manner of assistance - they will will help women pre and post birth of their child … health care assistance, infant care needs - diapers, furniture, parenting classes, rent assistance, food assistance, keep the child or adoption … In addition - they provide education … in fact the Oregon Roght to Life has created and maintained a website that has saved many lives … see here:

standupgirl.com/index.php

I imagine that every state has multiple homes for unwed mothers that help women choose life and give them help before and after the birth of their children … My state of Oregon has several that I am aware of … here is just obe organization that operates three such homes …

ccswv.org/fthhistory.html

My question is … After 30 plus years, multiple ‘catholic’ politicians elected with D afetr their name and huge numbers of pro-life democrats - why is the democratic platform pro-abortion, pro-euthanasia, pro-gay marriage … why has your party ignored your positions so completely? …

And I keep hearing that positions held by the republican [in their platform in paricular] and in general are in oposition to our Christian values … but I do not see that …

How is being for business [job creation] equated with being against the worker? Business needs and educated work force … and wanting your business to be profitable does not mean you do not want to pay a fair wage. Employees should want their employer to be profitable - because a business that is profitable will continue to employ them … a bankrupt business will not. Catholic Social teaching supports this - a worker is due a just wage - the business owner is due a just return on his work and his investment in that company

Wanting immigation to be in accordance with the law does not mean you are against immigration. Allowing illegal immigration allows for those same immigrants to be exploited and that exploitation takes on many faces including human trafficing - like sex trades and it helps to keep low wages and unsafe work environments … On the other side of the coin illegal immigration provides avenue for crime perpetrated by the illegals and upon the illegals … and is in harmony with Catholic Social teaching.

No republican, conservative or democrat I know of wants a dirty envirionment. We all have to eat and drink and breath as do our shildren and grandchildren and great grandchilren … however - some of our policies are exporting off shore what we could do here … like not allowing timber to be cut in the US … we import timber from countries that have lesser regulations - which I see as exporting environmental degradation …

So I reject the notion that republicans and conservatives are mean people, who want to destroy the environment and care only about the rich …

I am not rich - never have been - never will be … I want government [at all lvels] to do those things that are proper to their role AND THUS I do not believe that if you want or need to feed or house people in your local community - you can do so better/efficiently by first sending that Dollar to Washington - pass through one or more government agencies - before it returns to your local community - to feed or house the intended recipient … nor can I see how that fact would put me at odds with Catholic Social Teaching …

Suppporting parties and candidates that are pro-Abortion, pro-Euthanasia, pro-Gay Marriage are at odds with Catholic Social Teaching … and abortion is always intrinsically evil - no ifs and or buts … no compromise - always and everywhere a moral evil …
Thanks for taking the time to post your thoughts on this subject. Do you mind if I save it?
 
Yet if it is true that Catholics can only vote for the GOP candidate and not vote for Obama’s reelection, why does the Church not come out and say, “You must vote for his Republican opponent and not for Barack Obama”? Because surely if that were true, Christ’s one and only true Church would not withhold a truth just to avoid paying taxes.

Maybe you’d like to address this because I’ve asked it twice on this thread and no one else seems willing to touch it.
Again, you are sadly mistaken.

The Church has said abortion, gay marriage, etc. are wrong, period. No if’s ands or buts.

The Church has left issues suchy as taxes, healthcare, etc. up to prudential judgement.
 
PRINCETON, NJ – The U.S. political and economic environment at the start of 2012 is a challenging one for President Barack Obama as he seeks re-election. However, Gallup trends suggest that it is too soon to make any firm predictions about the outcome.

The following is a rundown of where some key indicators stand in January, and how trends today compare to years when previous incumbents sought re-election.

Presidential Job Approval

Obama’s job approval rating has averaged 44% in Gallup Daily tracking since the start of January. That is below the approval rating of seven out of eight previous incumbents at a comparable point in their presidencies. It exceeds the ratings of only one – Bill Clinton – in early January 1996.

With five of the eight former presidents who sought re-election – George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, Ronald Reagan, Richard Nixon, and Lyndon Johnson – winning a second term, and three – George H.W. Bush, Jimmy Carter, and Gerald Ford – losing, the January approval ratings do not appear to be strongly predictive of the election outcome.

However, by March of the re-election year, approval ratings for all of the prior presidents largely portended their fate. Ford’s, Carter’s, and the elder Bush’s March ratings were all well below 50%, while Clinton’s, Reagan’s, Nixon’s, and Johnson’s were above that mark. George W. Bush’s rating was 49%, right on the cusp of the level Gallup considers determinant for re-election.

http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com...roduction/Cms/POLL/mo0qewm5yu6kpe1bz8cw6w.gif

http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com...roduction/Cms/POLL/dh4whjigckgtplvuennirq.gif
http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com...roduction/Cms/POLL/032jtaga-eusvs-ziw6dsq.gif

http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com...roduction/Cms/POLL/xxgl-y5hzeamfnguclaewa.gif

http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com...roduction/Cms/POLL/_ixkiyl1e0aaybtzq12qdq.gif

http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com...roduction/Cms/POLL/pdoazit8z06casj5e4uymw.gif

gallup.com/poll/152051/Obama-Faces-Challenging-Election-Climate.aspx
 
Absent the enabling factor of appropriations for this executive order, the previously-reaffirmed provisions of the Hyde, Church, and Weldon amendments would continue in effect by default. There’s nothing in this executive order OR in the Affordable Care Act that supersedes or negates these previous laws. This sounds to me like a pretty iron-clad way to ensure the continuity of existing legal provisions.
The Hyde amendment only applies to appropriations in the bill to which it is attached. I’ve commented on this before. The PPACA appropriates its own funds for CHC’s, and it not subject to the Hyde amendment.
 
Saying liberals “never” is painting with a rather broad brush. I’ve seen some right here on this thread, including some Catholics, saying they believe abortion is wrong but have other reasons for voting for Obama. Or other liberals might personally believe abortion is wrong but perhaps on this issue take an approach on the order of the first and thus far only Catholic POTUS when it comes to public policy:
This type of pedantry gets frustrating. Of course Robert didn’t mean never in the literal sense. It is rhetoric. You, like some other posters, have a habit of ignoring the obvious implication and instead drag out a red herring by being so pedantic. Address the point being made instead of a literal reading. :rolleyes:
 
Thanks for taking the time to post your thoughts on this subject. Do you mind if I save it?
No problem … You may save it, spell check it, grammer check, edit it and add to it - to your heart’s content … Have a great day
 
And how is it that an informed catholic has no idea of what is done to help women in this manner?

There are Crisis Pregnancy Centers in every major city … they pay extra for listings in the phone book under the tital Abortion Alternatives so that they are present when a pregnant woman seeks for an aboriton provider … something the abortion providers have attempted to fight [its not informed consent or equal opportunity they seek but the abortion $$'s - big industry :eek:] … Crisis pregnancy centers will help women pre and post birth of their child … health care assistance, infant care needs - diapers, furniture, parenting classes, rent assistance, food assistance, keep the child or adoption …

Every state has a Right to Life organization [as well as the National one] … .they provide all manner of assistance - they will will help women pre and post birth of their child … health care assistance, infant care needs - diapers, furniture, parenting classes, rent assistance, food assistance, keep the child or adoption … In addition - they provide education … in fact the Oregon Roght to Life has created and maintained a website that has saved many lives … see here:

standupgirl.com/index.php

I imagine that every state has multiple homes for unwed mothers that help women choose life and give them help before and after the birth of their children … My state of Oregon has several that I am aware of … here is just obe organization that operates three such homes …

ccswv.org/fthhistory.html

My question is … After 30 plus years, multiple ‘catholic’ politicians elected with D afetr their name and huge numbers of pro-life democrats - why is the democratic platform pro-abortion, pro-euthanasia, pro-gay marriage … why has your party ignored your positions so completely? …

And I keep hearing that positions held by the republican [in their platform in paricular] and in general are in oposition to our Christian values … but I do not see that …

How is being for business [job creation] equated with being against the worker? Business needs and educated work force … and wanting your business to be profitable does not mean you do not want to pay a fair wage. Employees should want their employer to be profitable - because a business that is profitable will continue to employ them … a bankrupt business will not. Catholic Social teaching supports this - a worker is due a just wage - the business owner is due a just return on his work and his investment in that company

Wanting immigation to be in accordance with the law does not mean you are against immigration. Allowing illegal immigration allows for those same immigrants to be exploited and that exploitation takes on many faces including human trafficing - like sex trades and it helps to keep low wages and unsafe work environments … On the other side of the coin illegal immigration provides avenue for crime perpetrated by the illegals and upon the illegals … and is in harmony with Catholic Social teaching.

No republican, conservative or democrat I know of wants a dirty envirionment. We all have to eat and drink and breath as do our shildren and grandchildren and great grandchilren … however - some of our policies are exporting off shore what we could do here … like not allowing timber to be cut in the US … we import timber from countries that have lesser regulations - which I see as exporting environmental degradation …

So I reject the notion that republicans and conservatives are mean people, who want to destroy the environment and care only about the rich …

I am not rich - never have been - never will be … I want government [at all lvels] to do those things that are proper to their role AND THUS I do not believe that if you want or need to feed or house people in your local community - you can do so better/efficiently by first sending that Dollar to Washington - pass through one or more government agencies - before it returns to your local community - to feed or house the intended recipient … nor can I see how that fact would put me at odds with Catholic Social Teaching …

Suppporting parties and candidates that are pro-Abortion, pro-Euthanasia, pro-Gay Marriage are at odds with Catholic Social Teaching … and abortion is always intrinsically evil - no ifs and or buts … no compromise - always and everywhere a moral evil …
This is a great post and deserves being reposted on forums and blogs all over.
 
Can you provide support for this claim? … where has a republican ever stated that they refused to reduce toxins or desired toxins in the environment. Perhps youa re thinking of the clean water standards that Clinton put in place minutes before he left office that Bush had to overturn … this was a political ploy perpetrated by Clinton … who could have done that when he was in office [except it was unnecessary and not economically viable].

. How do you “know” this?

How about the toxicity caused by Oral Contaceptives? … they cause miscarriages/abortion …

And do you have numbers of deaths due to “Climate Change”?
This post should be added / edited into the other one.

Great response.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top