So, I could be wrong here, but I was listening to a radio station (EWTN? Protestant? Canât remember). Anyway, it was on this very question. Are we supposed to be endlessly âniceâ?
The person speaking on this topic made the following point, which I thought was interesting and a perspective I had never considered. She said (summarized): When we hear turn the other cheek, go the extra mile, give your tunic also, etc, we tend to interpret it as âdonât be mean, be uber-nice alwaysâ. But this woman suggested that that wasnât what Jesus was saying. He WAS saying âbe niceâ, hence the âgo above and beyondâ aspect, but she also said to note that there WAS a limit set. So:
give not just one cheek (donât fight back after the first punch, which most people of the time would have done), give two. In this way, they will know that Christians love, Christians forgive. But He DIDNâT say âgive your whole body unto death to the one who would strike youâ. He limited the ânicenessâ to two cheeks instead of one. You give more than expected, more than you want, even, but not endlessly.
Walk not one mile carrying his things, walk two. Do more. Love more. Help even the âundeservingâ more. But not for an eternity of mile-walking. For two miles.
Give not just your cloak but your tunic, as well. Give more. Cover the naked even more. But not âgo naked yourselfâ.
The gist of her talk was that, yes, we ARE kind. Kinder than the world around us, in fact. But not doormats; there is a limit. You are called to forgive any who take advantage of you who ask for your forgiveness (and even if they donât). Hard, hard saying. But you are not required to allow them to continue to take advantage of you.
As for âJesus wasnât niceââŚmaybe. Maybe not. We werenât there and that is key. I am a speech/language specialistâŚI make my living based on my knowledge of communication. One thing I know about words is that they are, in and of themselves, not totally communicative. Context, tone, inflection, cultural considerations and knowledge, knowledge of myths/legends/tales, facial expression, body language----> accurate interpretation of these non-verbal communication mileposts is critical to full receipt of the intended message.
Bruce Marchiano does an EXCELLENT job of portraying this. His portrayal of Christ communicates his admonitions with extreme clearness. Grief, sorrow, joy, humor, directness, exasperation and, yes, anger. But not mean. Heâs never mean. You canât listen to HOW he says the words of Christ and feel the hurt that comes from intentional cruelness. You feel as you would if you were scolded by a loving Father. It changed the entire way I viewed the words of Christ. Highly recommend you view it.
Hereâs a snippet: