I haven’t looked back but if I am not mistaken you first posted the Apostles Creed. The Apostles’ Creed is not considered authoritative in the East, nor is it formed by an Ecumenical Council. The Creed was only used by the Roman Church, and is formed from the Roman baptismal formula.
See this from the Center for Reformed Theology
reformed.org/documents/index.html?mainframe=http://www.reformed.org/documents/apostles_creed_orr.html:
This is an assertion but yet to be proven. Each protestant church chooses a different point to start from where they see “the cores” and what the “first church” practiced. How can all be right?
So when some of the Anglicans profess the Catholic belief in praying for their dead, and venerate saints, are they just obeying Rome or do they actually believe the early church did this? Between the Anglicans that say the episcopate is intrinsic to Succession and the Lutherans that say the presbyterate is sufficient - which is more ‘early church’?
Why is not calling your church “a church” disrespectful? My understanding of Church is that it follows certain definitions, some of which your church does not consider a “core” and “essential” - therefore out of respect for your beliefs and mine, I used a different word. However, since it offends you that I do not inherently hold your views without discussion, I will go ahead and do so.
Hi my friend
I wonder if we are ever on the same page.
Do you think I care about authority like you understand it. The Francis says today “Jesus is God” and I say I agree, does that make me Catholic?? Just like I like Pizza, doesn’t make me Italian.
To the point, are we gonna have a discussion about this. The apostles Creed was established. It doesn’t contradict anything, affirmed everything Biblical. I don’t see the problem anymore on this subject. If you have one, point it out very clearly please.
This is an assertion but yet to be proven. Each protestant church chooses a different point to start from where they see “the cores” and what the “first church” practiced. How can all be right?
So when some of the Anglicans profess the Catholic belief in praying for their dead, and venerate saints, are they just obeying Rome or do they actually believe the early church did this? Between the Anglicans that say the episcopate is intrinsic to Succession and the Lutherans that say the presbyterate is sufficient - which is more ‘early church’?
This is an assertion but yet to be proven. Each protestant church chooses a different point to start from where they see “the cores” and what the “first church” practiced. How can all be right?
So when some of the Anglicans profess the Catholic belief in praying for their dead, and venerate saints, are they just obeying Rome or do they actually believe the early church did this? Between the Anglicans that say the episcopate is intrinsic to Succession and the Lutherans that say the presbyterate is sufficient - which is more ‘early church’?
I’m not so sure. Don’t they all start from Christ? And that brings me to saying though it seems like all just assume (and most ignore my posts), What makes the Catholic CHURCH the first Church?
Why is not calling your church “a church” disrespectful? My understanding of Church is that it follows certain definitions, some of which your church does not consider a “core” and “essential” - therefore out of respect for your beliefs and mine, I used a different word. However, since it offends you that I do not inherently hold your views without discussion, I will go ahead and do so.
This is just a sad response my friend. My you please reconsider and look into that. It seems like you need some work. I would also like to talk to you like you actually care what I say. Else no point in it. And we could go on with our lives separately.
Regards
Michael