today's Mass readings (no Once Saved Always Saved)

[guanophore]

So?

You accused me of forwarding untrue statements to support Roman Catholics. That is a false assumption on your part.

It was Not made by the Catholic church, it was made by the Early Church. Exclusivity was not an issue as of yet.

The Early Church is the Catholic Church. Jesus only established one Church. He only has One Body. And yes, there was an issue of exlusivity, or more properly, inclusivity, when the NT was written. It is made clear in the pages that there are some that have already departed from Apostolic Teaching and Authority, just as you have.

The Church was catholic you mean. The word catholic used as an adjective to describe the Church as being universal.

At least we are in agreement about something!

 

[TAB39]

You accused me of forwarding untrue statements to support Roman Catholics. That is a false assumption on your part.

It’s not an assumption nor is it false. You have an obvious agenda to ostracize and exclude without any basis and if that supports Roman Catholics, then I cannot argue with the facts.

But you aren’t in agreement. Look at your last paragraph.

 

[guanophore]

It’s not an assumption nor is it false. You have an obvious agenda to ostracize and exclude without any basis and if that supports Roman Catholics, then I cannot argue with the facts.

No, I do not. I have no agenda to support “Romanism” whatsoever. In fact, if you look at my history here on CAF, you will find that I am one of the strongest proponents against the erroneous thinking that the Catholic Church is Roman. You have made a false assumption, probably because of your anti-RCC prejudice.

I am mystified about the ostracizing and excluding parts. Perhaps you are responding to my observation that you are masquerading as catholic? I support your right to do this. It is not against forum rules, and if you wish to misrepresent yourself while you are role playing on the internet this is your privilege.

You make accusations from assumptions that you have absolutely no support for. Why are you here?

I am here to enjoy lively discussions with persons such as yourself!

Are you claiming that your posts reflect catholicity? I have made statements based upon my observations. I read what you wrote, carefully.

But you aren’t in agreement. Look at your last paragraph

We are in agreement. Catholic means universal. It has nothing to do with being “Roman” though.

 

[TAB39]

No, I do not. I have no agenda to support “Romanism” whatsoever. In fact, if you look at my history here on CAF, you will find that I am one of the strongest proponents against the erroneous thinking that the Catholic Church is Roman. You have made a false assumption, probably because of your anti-RCC prejudice.

I am mystified about the ostracizing and excluding parts. Perhaps you are responding to my observation that you are masquerading as catholic? I support your right to do this. It is not against forum rules, and if you wish to misrepresent yourself while you are role playing on the internet this is your privilege.

I am here to enjoy lively discussions with persons such as yourself!

Are you claiming that your posts reflect catholicity? I have made statements based upon my observations. I read what you wrote, carefully.

We are in agreement. Catholic means universal. It has nothing to do with being “Roman” though.

I must say that I am mystified by your motives and proclamations. However, that is not always a bad thing.

 

[Soutane]

Well,that banning didn’t take long.I wonder what this guy’s next iteration will be.I’m sure he has been banned here several times already as I recognised his "style’’ in previous manifestations.

 

[distracted]

TAB39:
Jesus and His Church are inseparable…

as one saint said (can’t recall which one, but probably more than one):

The Church is Christ…

He is there (Real Presence) 24/7…

 

[distracted]

Well,that banning didn’t take long.I wonder what this guy’s next iteration will be.I’m sure he has been banned here several times already as I recognised his "style’’ in previous manifestations.

are you talking about TAB?

if that guy’s Catholic, then I am not… :whacky::banghead:

 

[Soutane]

are you talking about TAB?

if that guy’s Catholic, then I am not… :whacky::banghead:

Yep.I’m sure he has been here a few times before under different board-names.I recognised his style and specious arguementation and I’m sure like the Phoenix he will be back.The small “c” Catholic identification was just a cheap trick.

 

[distracted]

Yep.I’m sure he has been here a few times before under different board-names.I recognised his style and specious arguementation and I’m sure like the Phoenix he will be back.The small “c” Catholic identification was just a cheap trick.

what was his handle before TAB?

why was he banned?

just wondering… never read a post of his that was that far “out there”…

 

[Soutane]

what was his handle before TAB?

why was he banned?

just wondering… never read a post of his that was that far “out there”…

I suspect that one of them was Seeking 12.As to why he was banned I have no idea,nor do I wish to speculate,but I received a vicious and nasty PM from Seeking 12.Very often egregiously offensive posts are removed by the moderators before you even see them.

 

[distracted]

I suspect that one of them was Seeking 12.As to why he was banned I have no idea,nor do I wish to speculate,but I received a vicious and nasty PM from Seeking 12.Very often egregiously offensive posts are removed by the moderators before you even see them.

vicious and nasty…

hmmm… now i am very curious…

probably shouldn’t be… but…

 

[SacredHeart1987]

oasis is a lie.

2 Tim. 2:11-13 “A faithful saying: for if we be dead with him, we shall live also with him. If we suffer, we shall also reign with him. If we deny him, he will also deny us. If we believe not, he continueth faithful, he can not deny himself.”