I don’t understand, are you agreeing or disagreeing with me? because you seem to be saying the same thing I am.
I don’t understand what having relatives, or them being from NY has to do with whether or not the babies will be baptised in a Catholic Church:shrug:
You said it could only be a at “renegade” Catholic parish. I’m saying that it might be at what passes in LA as a “normal” Catholic parish. There are lists and lists of parishes in the LA archdiocese that are **not **considered “renegade” but will baptize these children. If I’m mistaken I’m sorry.
Further, it doesn’t have to happen in LA. All these people have money. They can fly wherever, to whatever really, truly Catholic parish and have it done. It doesn’t make it right, but it can indeed happen.
So, there is a possibility that some priest who is in good standing someplace will just baptize these children, without the hope that they will be raised Catholic, because their parents were bapitzed Catholic, their half-siblings have been baptized Catholic, and because of the celebrity the couple offers.
OK, as far as I know Katie is still a practicing Catholic…No she is not. She became a Scientologist in 2005.
NONE of us have reliable information as to status of the prior marriages of J Lo or Marc A. Yes, we do, as this couple has celebrity status,and the State of Calfornia has searchable databases online. The putative Mr. and Mrs. Anthony were married at her home with 40 or so relatives and close friends in attendance, by a JP, four days after Mr. Anthony’s divorce from the first Mrs. Anthony. It is hardly private. While they denied it for months, it is a matter of public record that can be researched online through the County of Los Angeles.
Creating scandal by naming TOM as a GP is bad, suppossing we know the status of prior marriages of JLo and Marc is a sin. Leave this to the priest conducting the baptism. Why? Priests do all sorts of things outside canon law all the time. The possibility that this priest, whoever he is, falls under the juristiction of an archdiocese that has questionable policies means that the faithful can certainly question the situation, as amost all of them have to live as practicing Catholics in order to have their children bapitzed, or at least present proof that there is a reasonable hope for the children to be raised Catholic.
Here’s what gets me: There are Hollyowood celebs who are Catholics who at least make an effort. Fine. They do their best and toddle along. They will not lead people astray in their celebrity.
Then there are Hollywood celebs who get to twist canon law and do pretty much what they darn well please. Priests let them, heck, cardinals let them. They give the poorly catechized the idea that they, too, can just go off and do whatever as well, because so-and-so did it.
I realize God is their judge, and somebody these celebs are going to have to face Him. But I so hope and pray for the others who are being led astray by them- and Yes, in that instance, I do have the right to discern that their behavior is deplorable, and that it is wrong.