Top Islamic scholars suspend talks with Vatican [CWN]

  • Thread starter Thread starter CWN_News
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

CWN_News

Guest
Egypt’s Al Azhar University, the world’s leading center of Sunni Islamic thought, has suspended talks with the Vatican in protest over the “insulting remarks” by Pope Benedict XVI–a …

More…
 
Remember that nobody “represents” Islam in general or even particular Muslim denominations. Dialogue with other Sunnis, as well as Shiites, should continue despite this.
 
Yeah, I’m with InSearchofGrace here. It’s impossible to speak honestly and not offend Muslims. They’ll have to learn to live with offense if they want to be part of the world, and while they’re unwilling to do that I don’t see a problem with saying: Good. Go away. Come back when you’re willing to stop being babies, oh glorious “Ulema”. :rolleyes:
 
As we see in so many cases, our Holy Father’s unwillingness to accept relativism and indifferentism; his unwillingness to compromise revealed truth causes discomfort in certain quarters. And those discomforted by the truth, of course, are “insulted”. Their reaction appears strangely similar to someone whose ideas or actions have no defense.
 
I seems to me that Hitler took offense when Pius XII and some bishops spoke out against his massacre of Jews. Governments that kill peaceful people based only on their religious beliefs just aren’t likely to welcome the disapproval of the Catholic church.
 
Why is it that radical Islamic extremist have the same personality traits as 14 year old American Emo kids.
 
This branch of Sunni Islam reveals that it is founded on the lie. They are incensed because Pope Benedict XVI is calling for the protection of Christians in Egypt. Since the Muslim call is to convert or kill, it seems they have narrowed their focus to simply killing. How do you convert a dead person to Islam? Is this an example of Muslim Calvinism?
 
Egypt’s Al Azhar University, the world’s leading center of Sunni Islamic thought, has suspended talks with the Vatican in protest over the “insulting remarks” by Pope Benedict XVI–a …
And where is the Coptic Pope (Shenouda III) to defend Pope Benedict :confused:

Shouldn’t he do that and assures that Egypt should protect Coptic Christians from mob violence !!!
 
Remember that nobody “represents” Islam in general or even particular Muslim denominations. Dialogue with other Sunnis, as well as Shiites, should continue despite this.
the scholar is talking from political aspect and about specific events , he did’t suspend talking with others in general

i will quote from the OP link

Egyptian religious did not particularly like " interference in the affairs of Egypt and the fact that Islam was described in the wrong way.
 
And where is the Coptic Pope (Shenouda III) to defend Pope Benedict :confused:

Shouldn’t he do that and assures that Egypt should protect Coptic Christians from mob violence !!!
no one denied that we should protect our citizens ( muslims and christians ) from terrorism
 
I find it the height of hypocrisy and very disgusting that Islamic leaders would complain about foreign interference in the internal matters of Egypt when they never cease to blather on and on about the condition of the poor oppressed Muslims in other countries. What is the Pope doing that is any different than that? It seems that, once again, Islam demands for itself a phony “respect” (a silencing of all criticism, no matter how absolutely right it is) that it cannot give. That’s right – its leaders can’t even give a phony respect, let alone anything real. And the Pope wasn’t even asking for that, just an end to the violence and persecution. And Al-Azar complains. Un-freaking-believable! :mad:

God forbid anyone should ever bomb Al-Azar like they bombed Al-Qiddisin. Then their idiotic sheikhs might have to stop whining for five minutes. I don’t know how they would manage.
 
That was it. the one sentence? “Egypt should protect Coptic Christians from mob violence.” You are referring to this “Constructive Criticism” right?

There’s a new concept in the West called “freedom of speech”. Accepting it means you may hear some things you won’t like. But maybe, just maybe those are the very thought provoking ideas you need to hear. 🤷 I suggest that what is hard to look at is the barbaric behavior. And that behavior need be on public trail world-wide daily. And it will be.

Yes, I’m sure Egypt would prefer everyone remained silent about that issue. :rolleyes:
 
God forbid anyone should ever bomb Al-Azar like they bombed Al-Qiddisin. Then their idiotic sheikhs might have to stop whining for five minutes. I don’t know how they would manage.
There’s no need for this kind of talk. Talk about bombing Al Azar is just stupid and childish.

I wonder what some young follower of Islam who is curious about Catholicism would think if he were to wander in here and read this thread? Every lie he has ever been taught about Christianity was confirmed with that one statement. There is no need for this childish idiocy.

First some Fundamentalist idiot in Florida talks about burning the Koran and then bombs go off in Christian Chruches. See the connection? Do you think that the Islamic Extremists you hate so much -don’t- read this website?

I can hear the headlines in Cairo now… “Extremist Christians on a Fundamentalist Orthodox website threatened to blow up Islamic Holy Site”

When will it end? Please, please stop.

-Tim-
 
the scholar is talking from political aspect and about specific events , he did’t suspend talking with others in general

i will quote from the OP link

Egyptian religious did not particularly like " interference in the affairs of Egypt and the fact that Islam was described in the wrong way.
But isn’t it true that this interference was simply a call for an end to violence against Christians?

And the “wrong” description of Islam was from Regensburg, which was blown out of proportion and which was explained/retracted by the Pope. For Muslims to keep beating that drum, while reacting angrily to any criticism of lethal violence against Christians in Muslim countries, does not make Islam look very good.

Murderous actions like this simply make Christians think that the Pope was right at Regensburg–or maybe that he didn’t go far enough!

Edwin
 
That was it. the one sentence? “Egypt should protect Coptic Christians from mob violence.” You are referring to this “Constructive Criticism” right?

There’s a new concept in the West called “freedom of speech”. Accepting it means you may hear some things you won’t like. But maybe, just maybe those are the very thought provoking ideas you need to hear. 🤷 I suggest that what is hard to look at is the barbaric behavior. And that behavior need be on public trail world-wide daily. And it will be.

Yes, I’m sure Egypt would prefer everyone remained silent about that issue. :rolleyes:
i heared about this concept " freedom of speech "
is the freedom of not speech involved in the west ?

i think that i have freedom to choose the one which i speak to and the one i ignore to speak to either

by the way i don’t think that it was just one sentence , may be we have to take a look about what he said exactly to judge , i just talking in general
when two people decide to argue with each other , there must be level of respect between them in the first place before beginning their speech ,
 
But isn’t it true that this interference was simply a call for an end to violence against Christians?
may be it true
but it dosn’t seems exactly like that to us

Tayyeb said the pontiff has repeated similar calls following attacks against Christians in Iraq suggesting that the Christians were facing mass persecution in the Middle East.

“But he never spoke about the mass killings of Iraqi Muslims at the hands of American and their allies,” he added.

Benedict’s positions have often caused controversies.

In September 2006, he delivered a lecture in Germany quoting a 14th century Byzantine emperor that everything Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessing be upon him) brought was evil and inhuman.

Al-Azhar said that Benedict’s repeated insults against Islam render inter-religious dialogue failure.

“The Islamic Research Council reviewed in an emergency meeting on Thursday the repeatedly insulting remarks issued by the Vatican Pope towards Islam and his statement that Muslims are discriminating against others who live with them in the Middle East," Al-Azhar said in a statement.
And the “wrong” description of Islam was from Regensburg, which was blown out of proportion and which was explained/retracted by the Pope. For Muslims to keep beating that drum, while reacting angrily to any criticism of lethal violence against Christians in Muslim countries, does not make Islam look very good.
actually , islam teach us to deal justly and kindly with christians , and this is enough for me to think that islam is very very good
existence of some terrorism will not change the facts about true teaching of islam , but if you want to find excuses for yourself to condemn islam then you are free to believe that and i’m free to deny it
 
But isn’t it true that this interference was simply a call for an end to violence against Christians?
may be it true
but it dosn’t seems exactly like that to us

Tayyeb said the pontiff has repeated similar calls following attacks against Christians in Iraq suggesting that the Christians were facing mass persecution in the Middle East.

“But he never spoke about the mass killings of Iraqi Muslims at the hands of American and their allies,” he added.

Benedict’s positions have often caused controversies.

In September 2006, he delivered a lecture in Germany quoting a 14th century Byzantine emperor that everything Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessing be upon him) brought was evil and inhuman.

Al-Azhar said that Benedict’s repeated insults against Islam render inter-religious dialogue failure.

“The Islamic Research Council reviewed in an emergency meeting on Thursday the repeatedly insulting remarks issued by the Vatican Pope towards Islam and his statement that Muslims are discriminating against others who live with them in the Middle East," Al-Azhar said in a statement.
And the “wrong” description of Islam was from Regensburg, which was blown out of proportion and which was explained/retracted by the Pope. For Muslims to keep beating that drum, while reacting angrily to any criticism of lethal violence against Christians in Muslim countries, does not make Islam look very good.
actually , islam teach us to deal justly and kindly with christians , and this is enough for me to think that islam is very very good
existence of some terrorism will not change the facts about true teaching of islam , but if you want to find excuses for yourself to condemn islam then you are free to believe that and i’m free to deny it
 
may be it true
but it dosn’t seems exactly like that to us

Tayyeb said the pontiff has repeated similar calls following attacks against Christians in Iraq suggesting that the Christians were facing mass persecution in the Middle East.

“But he never spoke about the mass killings of Iraqi Muslims at the hands of American and their allies,” he added.

Benedict’s positions have often caused controversies.

In September 2006, he delivered a lecture in Germany quoting a 14th century Byzantine emperor that everything Prophet Muhammad (peace and blessing be upon him) brought was evil and inhuman.

Al-Azhar said that Benedict’s repeated insults against Islam render inter-religious dialogue failure.

“The Islamic Research Council reviewed in an emergency meeting on Thursday the repeatedly insulting remarks issued by the Vatican Pope towards Islam and his statement that Muslims are discriminating against others who live with them in the Middle East," Al-Azhar said in a statement.

actually , islam teach us to deal justly and kindly with christians , and this is enough for me to think that islam is very very good
existence of some terrorism will not change the facts about true teaching of islam , but if you want to find excuses for yourself to condemn islam then you are free to believe that and i’m free to deny it
Seems to me that the “mass killings of Iraqi Muslims” seem to come from competing Muslim sects as they bomb bazaars and mosques and other Iraqi gathering places. Strange that they would be considered “American allies”.
 
i heared about this concept " freedom of speech "
is the freedom of not speech involved in the west ?

i think that i have freedom to choose the one which i speak to and the one i ignore to speak to either

by the way i don’t think that it was just one sentence , may be we have to take a look about what he said exactly to judge , i just talking in general
when two people decide to argue with each other , there must be level of respect between them in the first place before beginning their speech ,
There not big on the No Speech theory here. MOF they don’t when to shut up here.😃

So many problems and such an overpopulated world. One can only wonder what will happen next. Thousands of years and man is still stuck on…"if they are not of your “Race, Ethnic Background, Social status, same Religion, and Physically Fit” then by all means lets slaughter them.:confused: An around and round we go.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top