O
OraLabora
Guest
There are three gates by which I try to evaluate what I say (something I learned from Richard Rohr). I’m not always successful because I too am a sinner but here they are:I did not slam a community. I only wanted to say the true. This is not a traditional community as the traditionalist say it. Also, I only said true things! Is it so bad to advise traditional women that this is not a traditional community with tridentine mass! No, I think it is a charity because somme communities try to catch vocations without saying who they really are. AND I MENTION NO COMMUNITY’ ’ i say it as it is and even some nuns recognize it. It happens and we have to be knowing it. Then we choose in truth and knowledge. And I do not aim a community.
- is it true? If it is verifiably true (and not a matter of opinion or conjecture) then you pass to gate 2:
- is it charitable. In this case it manifestly isn’t. You’re taking a very private conflict into a public forum.
- is it necessary to say? In this case, no, at least not on public forum. The persons involved can say it during a canonical visit if they want…
I certainly know the abbey, I know its chaplain very well (he was my Gregorian chant teacher and choirmaster for several years), and I have met several of the sisters there.
It clearly therefore offends me to read continued criticism of the abbey. And it is, I repeat, against forum rules.