Traditional Catholics Who Do Not Attend Mass?

[bkovacs]

So an illicit mass is beautiful? What about all the other sacraments you don’t receive from the SSPX priests but you think you do? I hope you didn’t go to confession to an SSPX priest with a mortal sin on your soul then go to Holy Communion. Or do you pick & choose How do you judge within your heart what priest is worthy & what priest is not? Do you totally reject the Holy Father so far it appears you do in word & deed? If that’s the case you are not a catholic in any way shape or form. There are many TLM masses within the True Roman Catholic Church. You can only receive the sacraments from the True Roman Catholic Church by an Ordained Priest. The TLM Masses are said by an Ordained Priest of the Roman Catholic Church or do you think you have cause to reject that too? If you think Christ is being crucified within His own church then why do you abandon Him?

Fr John Jenkin’s, President and CEO of Notre Dame University, who hosted a partied with a Pro-Abortionist, was also part of the TRUE Roman Catholic Church too. And his Masses and confessions are licit. You should read up on Austria, and the Diocese of Linz. Also the TRUE Roman Catholic Church and all licit Sacraments. Especially given at their Valid Techno Mass. Lainey, when was the last time they talked about Hell and Damnation at your homily.

 

[bkovacs]

You, my friend, are ignorant of doctrine. Where in Tradutuin does it say anyone can go against Rome because of personal issues. I can think of some who have in the past. Martin Luther did. So did Henry VIII, under the direction of Thomas Cranmer. In other words, those who hold your views, that you can break with Rome because you are annoyed,pretty much meet the dictionary definition of Protestant.

Keep in mind that Henry VIII, and Martin Luther would fit right in to the mainstream Catholic Church today!. They left Traditional Catholicism, not modern day Catholicism. If they were alive in the seventies, they would have re-established communion right after Vatican 2. My guess!.

 

[CWBetts]

Keep in mind that Henry VIII, and Martin Luther would fit right in to the mainstream Catholic Church today!. They left Traditional Catholicism, not modern day Catholicism. If they were alive in the seventies, they would have re-established communion right after Vatican 2. My guess!.

I doubt it. You and they have done the same thing: deny the authority of the Church. You seem to think you know more than the Pope. There is a word for that: Protestant.

 

[iluvburpees]

I doubt it. You and they have done the same thing: deny the authority of the Church. You seem to think you know more than the Pope. There is a word for that: Protestant.

I really find it ironic how often I hear you all say that we are against the Church, and that we “know more than the pope.” Nothing but straw-man arguments and, well, lies.

It seems as though you don’t want to accept the fact that the the bishops, the cardinals, even the pope, can make mistakes. You make them infallible in matters that do NOT concern faith or morals.You, not we, are treating them unfairly.

Or do you not consider them infallible in matters that do not concern faith or morals? In that case, why do you condemn us for questioning the liberal and modernist Novus Ordo? Why do you condemn us for holding to the Traditional, TRUE Mass? The pope doesn’t have the authority to destroy the True Mass, yet you think he does.

John XXIII read the Third Secret, yet put it aside because he feared that it would interfere with the changes he would introduce in VII. I’m sorry, but I’ll follow Our Lady of Fatima’s warnings concerning VII

 

[bkovacs]

I doubt it. You and they have done the same thing: deny the authority of the Church. You seem to think you know more than the Pope. There is a word for that: Protestant.

So I guess you would classify the Coptics and Greek Orthodox Protestant too. Hmm.

 

[bkovacs]

I really find it ironic how often I hear you all say that we are against the Church, and that we “know more than the pope.” Nothing but straw-man arguments and, well, lies.

It seems as though you don’t want to accept the fact that the the bishops, the cardinals, even the pope, can make mistakes. You make them infallible in matters that do NOT concern faith or morals.You, not we, are treating them unfairly.

Or do you not consider them infallible in matters that do not concern faith or morals? In that case, why do you condemn us for questioning the liberal and modernist Novus Ordo? Why do you condemn us for holding to the Traditional, TRUE Mass? The pope doesn’t have the authority to destroy the True Mass, yet you think he does.

John XXIII read the Third Secret, yet put it aside because he feared that it would interfere with the changes he would introduce in VII. I’m sorry, but I’ll follow Our Lady of Fatima’s warnings concerning VII

 

[Lainey63]

Fr John Jenkin’s, President and CEO of Notre Dame University, who hosted a partied with a Pro-Abortionist, was also part of the TRUE Roman Catholic Church too. And his Masses and confessions are licit. You should read up on Austria, and the Diocese of Linz. Also the TRUE Roman Catholic Church and all licit Sacraments. Especially given at their Valid Techno Mass. Lainey, when was the last time they talked about Hell and Damnation at your homily.

So according to this line of thinking you are saying “if you think we’re bad, look at him.” 2 wrongs don’t make a right. What others are doing wrong doesn’t justify another wrong.

 

[jmcrae]

I really find it ironic how often I hear you all say that we are against the Church, and that we “know more than the pope.” Nothing but straw-man arguments and, well, lies.

It seems as though you don’t want to accept the fact that the the bishops, the cardinals, even the pope, can make mistakes. You make them infallible in matters that do NOT concern faith or morals.You, not we, are treating them unfairly.

Or do you not consider them infallible in matters that do not concern faith or morals?

They don’t have to be infallible. They are in charge. What they say, goes. The Church is not a democracy, and like it or not, you have to obey your Bishop. Even if he is not speaking on a matter of faith or morals, and even if you think he is wrong. This is what it means, that he is “in charge.”

The pope doesn’t have the authority to destroy the True Mass, yet you think he does.

The Pope has the authority to compose any Mass he wants, and to promulgate it when ever and where ever he wants to. God says to him, “What you bind on earth is bound in Heaven. What you release on earth is released in Heaven.” But his authority does not extend beyond his own death. If his successor overturns his Mass and promulgates a different one in its place, there is nothing preventing him from doing so. It is the living Pope of today who is in charge of the whole Church - not those who came before.

 

[pickguard1]

I am curious as to how many Catholics do the same form of worship in this country, with just remaining in their private chapel in their home only, and not receiving the Body and the
Blood of Jesus?

Not many

 

[CWBetts]

I really find it ironic how often I hear you all say that we are against the Church, and that we “know more than the pope.” Nothing but straw-man arguments and, well, lies.

It seems as though you don’t want to accept the fact that the the bishops, the cardinals, even the pope, can make mistakes. You make them infallible in matters that do NOT concern faith or morals.You, not we, are treating them unfairly.

Or do you not consider them infallible in matters that do not concern faith or morals? In that case, why do you condemn us for questioning the liberal and modernist Novus Ordo? Why do you condemn us for holding to the Traditional, TRUE Mass? The pope doesn’t have the authority to destroy the True Mass, yet you think he does.

John XXIII read the Third Secret, yet put it aside because he feared that it would interfere with the changes he would introduce in VII. I’m sorry, but I’ll follow Our Lady of Fatima’s warnings concerning VII

In interest of charity, I am leacing this thread which has been taken over by schismatics.

 

[iluvburpees]

In interest of charity, I am leacing this thread which has been taken over by schismatics.

I 'd appreciate it if you wouldn’t brand me as a “schismatic.” I am not and never have been in schism. I pray for the pope every day, hoping that he will return to Tradition and leave behind the Modernist and Liberal Church of Vatican II.

Obey God, not erroneous men.