Trans-priests and the gender wars

  • Thread starter Thread starter ontheway1
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
many of these women believe that it is God who is calling them.
I’m sure they do, yet once they learn what the Church teaches, a Church God established according to His Will, then wouldn’t it occur to them that this really isn’t God calling them? We know that satan can imitate an Angel of Light, so … Either they are being deceived by satan in regards to convincing them it really is God, or it is from their own desires and not God at all.
 
I for one, see no reason why laypeople women or men, are prohibited from preaching.
Only within the context of the Mass. It is really too bad that so many Catholics only seem to go to Mass to hear preaching.
My issue with this thread and some of the comments is the rush to impune these women as prideful and childish.
I do think that is rash judgment. I don’t think that is the motive. I think they’re trying to be humble. I don’t think the actions are humble, but it is hardly as if I’m Humility Personified myself.

What I’m trying to say is that it is the action I would call out as not in keeping with humily. That is not to say that the interior state of someone who did it is necessarily less humble than my own. They could be far more humble than I’ll ever be in every other way.
 
It is entirely and completely about power. Women want the power to have authority over their own lives the same way men do.
 
I suppose the same could be said for Catholics who use artificial birth control.
True.
Why the selective outrage at a small group of people for their non-acceptance of doctrine
Because it affects the Sacraments of the Faith - the royal priesthood, in the line of Melchizedek. Because these women want to change the Church.
some estimates put the use of ABC among Catholics at about 80-90% at one time or another in their lives?
In their lives. And I’m sure of those, there are people who also want the Church to change their stance - but they have not formed a movement nor actively pushed for change. The may voice their opinions etc on the subject, but afaik haven’t formally formed a group to try to change Church teaching.

And this thread is not about ABC - but priests, and specificially Trans-priests, so the introduction of women priests is a little of topic. Mea culpa.
 
No one, male or female, has a “right” to ordination, so I am not sure if “power” has the right word here.
 
What does that mean? Especially in relation to the issue raised: women who want to be priests?
 
No one, male or female, has a “right” to ordination, so I am not sure if “power” has the right word here.
I should clarify. The power I’m referring to is the power to decide how one’s own life will be lived out. As long as women are barred from the priesthood, they will not be eligible to participate in the Magisterium. As such, they will forever be in the position of being subject to doctrines and disciplines without having any say in their formulation.

That very much is demanding power, but it’s demanding a power that we have the right to by virtue of being human.
 
Last edited:
It is entirely and completely about power. Women want the power to have authority over their own lives the same way men do.
That’s more of an argument for abolishing the priesthood entirely than for admitting women to a structure that gives a small number of people “all the power.” You still have a small number of clergy with the “power” over the majority of Christians, by that logic.

That kind of thinking is not what the priesthood or even Christianity is about. Who gets baptized in order to have “authority over their own lives”? No, Adam and Eve were attempting to exert authority over their own lives. That whole line of reasoning is a destructive lie, according to the plain meaning of the Holy Scriptures.
 
Last edited:
Radical individualism is a threat, as mentioned by Pope Benedict. All are subject to authority within the Church. All should ask questions about things that are unclear. The Church was founded by Jesus Christ, not men. When Christ handed the Church to Peter, Peter obeyed. Those who seek absolute control over their lives sometimes don’t realize that their life is not their own. God is the end of all alive today. All things pass away but God does not change, and He guides those who ask for guidance.
 
I should clarify. The power I’m referring to is the power to decide how one’s own life will be lived out. As long as women are barred from the priesthood, they will not be eligible to participate in the Magisterium. As such, they will forever be in the position of having to accept doctrines and disciplines without having any say in their formulation.

That very much is demanding power, but it’s demanding a power that we have the right to by virtue of being human.
Does the Magesterium have a “say” in formulating doctrine? They have the duty to teach what was handed down to them. They aren’t a legislative body who just gets to make up whatever doctrine or discipline they want, as the whim hits them.

This whole idea that being human means making your own rules is foreign to Christianity. Read the New Testament: it says to reject anyone who comes along and teaches anything different than the Apostles taught. Nowhere is there any idea that the faithful have a right to determine doctrine or even that preachers have the authority to change it. Nowhere. Where is the idea that to be human is to have authority? It isn’t there. That is a foreign concept.
The ability to make decisions about one’s own life path is inherent in the idea of the innate dignity of each human being.
That is a far cry from being entitled to any position you envision yourself having by virtue of being a human being. No, that is not what human freedom is.
 
Last edited:
The Catholic Church is not a human/man-made institution. It was founded by God to lead others to Him and to worship Him. God is above all. Anyone can do what they want. God will not force you to love Him. But the accusation and the desire for power reveals that the motive comes from something outside the Church.
 
That’s why some people want to see women become priests, even some men…and, I am afraid, even some priests. They really talk like that.
I belong to a denomination (ELCA) that has had women pastors since 1970 and some of the congregations I’ve belonged to have had at least one pastor who is a woman. Some of them have been very gifted preachers. The Presiding Bishop of the ELCA, Elizabeth Eaton, is an amazing preacher.

For all these women pastors I’ve known, being a pastor wasn’t about power or wanting to lord it over men or anything like that. I think that all of them have felt that God called them to be a pastor. And it’s not as if being a pastor is a very lucrative job. It usually involves long hours with low pay.
 
Last edited:
Yes, this sort of thinking comes from outside the Church and is foreign to it. Some have tried for decades to get some power they think they are entitled to. Understanding and wisdom followed by obedience based on sound doctrine is necessary. Anything else is questionable and should be examined.
 
Last edited:
I belong to a denomination (ELCA) that has had women pastors since 1970 and some of the congregations I’ve belonged to have had at least one pastor who is a woman. Some of them have been very gifted preachers. The Presiding Bishop of the ELCA, Elizabeth Eaton, is an amazing preacher.

For all these women pastors I’ve known, being a pastor wasn’t about power or wanting to lord it over men or anything like that. I think that all of them have felt that God called them to be a pastor.
That is fine, but you don’t invest your clergy with the same ontological meaning as the Catholic priesthood has. We have abbesses. We have women in leadership. Priestly ordination is not admission to an administrative position, though. Parishes also do not choose their own pastors. We don’t just do things differently than many other denominations do; we see priests as different persons than other denominations see their clergy. A Catholic priest is defined according to an entirely different theology, just as Catholic worship is entirely different in kind from how Protestants understand it. That’s why their theology eventually lead to women in the clerical state and ours will not be doing that.

Can. 285 §3. Clerics are forbidden to assume public offices which entail a participation in the exercise of civil power.
 
Last edited:
It is entirely and completely about power. Women want the power to have authority over their own lives the same way men do.
The Church teaches that women are not permanent minors and do have power over their own lives just like men.

But what does this have to do with priests?
 
Last edited:
I’m definitely all for dialogue. However, I think that in this case, with so much time, so much clear infallibility to the teaching, the fact that St. John Paul 2’s Ordinatio Sacerdotalis spells it out not just from ‘centuries ago’ but in OUR time, now, that the Church has no authority to ordain women, we are NOT, repeat NOT, 'belittling women" by making clear statements of what “is” and what “cannot be”.
 
I think what Cajun is getting at is that these femenists are trying to be like prideful Jezebel instead of obedient Mary. Instead of submitting to the Church’s teaching on woman’s ordination, they rebel and think they know better. They are trying ursup God’s natural order and trying to be in a place of leadership over the church much like Jezebel ursuped her husband’s power as the ruler of the kingdom of Israel.

Im sure some of the women that want to be preists mean well, but there is still women that don’t mean well and are only trying to change Church teaching because they don’t like the patriarchy.
 
I wasn’t asking CajunJoy. I know what she means because she and I are on the same page.

I was asking BTypical what does women being in charge of their own lives have anything to do with the priesthood.

I did get my question answered by reading the later posts.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top