D
donsnow
Guest
Good evening, Jerry,You probably don’t realize it but your questions are of the “have you stopped beating your wife” variety.
If you use the NRA as a source of info, then I can see why you are confused. The NRA spokesman Wayne LaPierre at CPAC 2012 truly showed the bats in the NRA belfry, when he literally said there is a “massive Obama conspiracy”. His proof? Well, the fact that Obama has done nothing against gun rights in his first term proves that he is just waiting for a second term to destroy the second amendment! I kid you not, this was his logic.
As the nonpartisan Politifact kindly put it, “none of Obama’s previous years in office hint at the kind of extreme policy push the NRA claims he’s yearning to unleash.”
You say:
I say, what are you talking about? How does that go to prove your point that this case is being used as part of some (not-secret) conspiracy to take away American’s guns? The reasons this killing is getting attention is obvious – it appears to be a horrible miscarriage of justice, of police incompetence or corruption, and people want to know how it’s possible such a killer was not charged at all. Is one of the cases you mention an example of someone killing a teenager under very suspicious circumstances and then the police letting him go without charging him with anything at all? If not, what are you trying to prove?
I doubt, with your NRA-programming and living in fear in your neighborhood, that you can really think clearly about this. But you ask loaded questions, so let me ask you one: Do you honestly think Trayvon would be free right now if he had pulled a gun and killed an unarmed man in the dark under suspicious circumstances? I think we both know he would be in jail awaiting trial, as Zimmerman should be.
Has living in fear made you identify with vigilantism and assume anyone who gets shot on the street probably deserved it? What is your motivation for not wanting a trial to expose all the facts in this case and determine what justice is?
Ah, first impunge my questions, instead of answering them. That’s not an honest tactic.
Then, while using the same tactic, you impunge my source. No, Jerry, I’m not confused.
I don’t watch or read the NRA conventions. I do suscribe to American Hunter, the NRA’s official monthly publication, but I seldom read the editorials.
But, just as you judged Wayne LaPierre by the words from his mouth, likewise I paid close attention to Senator Obama’s words when he ran for president. And, his words where extremely radical and cast him as a flaming socialist. I think Socialism has no place in America because it perverts the law, weakens the economy and has no regard of individual property rights.
I’m not here to “prove” anything. I’m here to present information standing up to the faults of the mainstream media and educational system of America. If you think there’s nothing wrong with either of those, then maybe you’re the one confused.
Please, don’t turn my vocational education against me. There’s nothing wrong the with NRA.
Frankly, I think that citizens like you, professors who teach vulnerable college students and politicians who do attack our Second Amendment are very dangerous people, getting innocent people killed by hindering them from carrying weapons in crime ridden America.
I do not live in fear of the gang. I do try to keep a healthy fear of the Lord: “The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom; and before honor comes humility.” That’s from Proverbs.
And, if you think your neighborhood is safe from gangs, then you are very naive.
BTW, you never straightly answered my plain questions, so you have failed to impress me and to change my position.
God loves you,
Don