M
MT1926
Guest
I have no problem with this.JUSTIFICATION IN CATHOLIC TEACHING by Jimmy Akin
Quote: “The essence of supernatural love is unselfishness—doing something NOT
BECAUSE IT WILL HELP US SOMEHOW, but because we want to do it out of SHEER
LOVE for the other person, whether that person is God or one of our fellow human beings
out of the love of God.
This is THE ONLY KIND of love that ultimately pleases God and therefore the ONLY
KIND that ultimately gets us a reward IN heaven.” End quote. Emphasize mine.
If we not set free to love freely, we cannot love.
If we not set free to freely decide to work, we cannot do supernatural work/merit.
We cannot please God with the work we MUST do, because we cannot do it FREELY,
WITHOUT any EXTERNAL COERCION or INTERNAL NECESSITY. **– The work we
MUST do is NOT supernatural work!!!**
Sorry I disagree with this. You are taking this to the extreme. You believe this to be black and white. I don’t believe God sees it that way.MUST always kills our supernatural works/good works.
You are ignoring the fact that quite often MUST turns into WANT. So the straw can turn to gold. And sometimes the WANT can easily turn to MUST. Which makes the gold turn back to straw.
It’s not as simple as you make it out to be. Doing something out of sheer love for another isn’t always one simple step that is checked off by God as being good works or not. Sometimes this supernatural work can be a commitment that last for years. At certain times it can be supernatural and other times not. Also, you are not thinking as a father does. The fact that your child does something that they “MUST” has different degrees of Love. Sometimes the pure and simple truth that they are forcing themselves to do something that they “MUST”, but that they really don’t want to do, is the purest act of Love they could ever show you. Now that is supernatural love.
This is the Only Work which is Supernatural:
Doing something, DECIDED FREELY without the fear of hell,
**work done **NOT BECAUSE IT WILL HELP US SOMEHOW,
**but because **we want to do it out of SHEER LOVE for the Glory of God, or help other person out of sheer love.
I have no idea what you are getting at here? It sounds like you are trying to say that if we are going to mass and the sacraments because we believe that is what Jesus says we have to do, then these are only done because of “EXTERNAL COERCION and INTERNAL NECESSITY for our own interest.”The works we do to prove ourselves, to get our salvation or to keep our salvation, **we do it by EXTERNAL COERCION and INTERNAL NECESSITY for our own interest **and this works are wood, hay and straw rejected by God and all our works goes up in smoke at the judgment of our works. – 1 Cor.3:12-15.
You are confusing me. If this is what you are trying to get at I don’t agree. Just because you are following the rules does not prove external coercion.
You’ve got me confused.
Finally, I just wanted to point out. DO you realize you picked and chose what you wanted from Jimmy’s article? To fit it into your theological argument.
Did you read these parts of the article?
Then it turns to the possibility of failing to persevere in God’s grace, of losing one’s justification, and of subsequently regaining it (ch.s 12-15).
Chapter nine brings to a close the discussion of our initial justification, and makes the very simple point that a person is not saved simply because he thinks he is.
In fact, this chapter teaches, no one should presume to claim to believe, “with the certainty of faith, which cannot be subject to error, that he” is in a state of grace.
This is true: we can have assurance that we are in a state of grace. However, what Trent is forbidding is the presumption to know “with the certainty of faith, which cannot be subject to error,” that this is the case.
We can know with the certainty of faith that,** if we do what Jesus says to do** in order to be justified (i.e., repent, believe, etc.), we will be in a state of grace, but since it nowhere says in the Bible, “Jimmy Akin has done what is necessary to be justified,” **I cannot know with the certainty of faith that I have done what is required. **
By examining myself, I can have very good reason to think that I have done so, and can thus have very great confidence in the fact that I am justified. But I always have to infer my justification, and since the human process of inference is fallible, I cannot know with infallible certainty that I am justified.
Jimmy says the exact same thing Dr. Anders did, which you rejected. How many times do you have to read it before believing?The point is that,** apart from a special revelation from God**, I have no infallible means of knowing that I am not one of these people, and so even though I can have very great assurance of my justification, I cannot have infallible, no-possibility-of-error, certainty of faith that I am justified.
Read Jimmy’s article again and take everything he says into account before coming to a conclusion.
God Bless