R
Ridgerunner
Guest
I mentioned no “practical problems”. What I asked was what practical steps you feel should and can be taken to ensure more testing. You haven’t responded. Do you just want more testing in the abstract, or do you know of a practical plan to do it?I’m not sure what “practical” problems you are expecting. If people are cooperative, there really isn’t a problem.
As part of what I did occupationally at one time in my life, I obtained thousands of medical records. They are not easy to get without the direct authorization of the person about whom they were generated. If the person doesn’t do that, you can’t get them other than lawyers obtaining them by subpoena, which often had to happen. But even that depends on the person telling the truth, which they often don’t, either because they don’t want to tell or because they are poor historians. Even when they’re subpoenaed pursuant to a lawsuit (in this state at least, and I think in Kansas) they can be objected to if they don’t directly relate to the subject of ongoing litigation.What experience do you have in contact tracing in the absence of privacy protection?
So yes, I am familiar with the difficulty of obtaining medical information if the subject isn’t forthcoming about it. Back before HIPAA, getting medical information was easy.
Lots of people won’t get tested. I have mentioned before on here that a physician with a big complex in St. Louis told me the doctors and nurses there won’t get tested if they develop symptoms or learn of an exposure because they don’t want to be off the line for two weeks and pull other medical providers in the system off the line with them due to “contact tracing”. I have spoken to many people who say they wouldn’t get tested unless it was necessary to get major treatment.
The whole system is voluntary, and if people don’t want to cooperate with it, they just don’t.